The Practice of International History in the Twenty-First Century

二十一世纪国际史实践

• 批准号: AH/M008711/1
• 负责人: Peter Jackson
• 金额: $ 4.2万
• 依托单位: University of Glasgow
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2015
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2015 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FM008711%2F1
• 关键词: Practice; International; History; Twenty; First

The international challenges facing British society today underline the crucial importance of understanding the nature and dynamics of world politics. International historians must play a role in furthering this understanding. The Practice of International History in the Twenty-First Century will create an international research network comprised of historians, international relations specialists and officials from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. The core objective is to establish an inter-disciplinary forum for collective reflection on the nature and practice of international history and its role in contributing to wider British society. The research network will include leading scholars from the UK, the European continent, North America and Australia. It will be made up of established researchers, PhD students, post-docs and early career scholars. This will provide a framework to allow UK-based international historians to make an important contribution to wider debates on the current and future state of our field.The past two decades have seen the emergence of fundamental challenges to the philosophical and methodological underpinnings of international history. Advocates of a 'cultural turn' have argued for greater attention to race, gender, religion and collective memory as a means of deepening our understanding of international politics. The emergence of 'transnational' history has presented a different kind of challenge that rejects the nation-state as the focus of analysis to concentrate on the flow of people, ideas and technologies across what are in many ways arbitrary national frontiers. This 'transnational turn' complements a turn away from 'Eurocentric' historical approaches that is a central feature of the new 'global history'. Debates among international relations [IR] theorists over the relative importance of ideas, institutions and material power have the potential to further enrich the work of international historians. A final challenge to practices in our field is the need to engage more fruitfully and systematically with the UK policy community in general, and with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office [FCO] in particular. International historians in North America and Europe have recently been active in addressing the implications of the issues raised above for the practice of international history. Scholars in the UK have been far less active. This project will provide a framework for redressing this silence while at the same time creating structures for ongoing engagement with the policy community as well as teachers of international history at all levels from schools to postgraduate university courses. A number of core questions have been identified to provide a conceptual framework for four one-day workshops. Historians and IR specialists from the UK, Europe, North America and Australia and FCO officials will participate in these workshops. The chief 'outputs' produced by the project will be a 'state of the field' collection of essays, an inter-active web-based resource for teaching and research in the history of international relations and durable structures for engagement with policy stakeholders. Achieving these aims will leave the present and future generations of international historians better-equipped to teach, research and to contribute more effectively to meeting the ever-changing international challenges of our time.

英国社会今天面临的国际挑战强调了理解世界政治的性质和动态的至关重要性。国际历史学家必须在促进这种理解方面发挥作用。“21世纪国际史实践”将建立一个由历史学家、国际关系专家和外交和联邦事务部官员组成的国际研究网络。其核心目标是建立一个跨学科的论坛，对国际历史的性质和实践及其在促进更广泛的英国社会的作用进行集体反思。该研究网络将包括来自英国，欧洲大陆，北美和澳大利亚的领先学者。它将由知名研究人员、博士生、博士后和早期职业学者组成。这将提供一个框架，使英国的国际历史学家作出重要贡献，更广泛地讨论我们的领域的当前和未来的状态。在过去的二十年里，已经看到了国际历史的哲学和方法论基础的根本挑战的出现。“文化转向”的倡导者主张更多地关注种族、性别、宗教和集体记忆，以加深我们对国际政治的理解。“跨国”历史的出现提出了一种不同的挑战，它拒绝将民族国家作为分析的焦点，而是集中在人们、思想和技术跨越在许多方面是任意的国家边界的流动上。这种“跨国转向”补充了对“欧洲中心”历史方法的转向，这是新的“全球历史”的核心特征。国际关系理论家之间关于思想、制度和物质力量的相对重要性的争论有可能进一步丰富国际历史学家的工作。在我们的领域的做法的最后一个挑战是需要更富有成效和系统地与英国政策界一般，特别是与外交和联邦事务部[FCO]。北美和欧洲的国际历史学家最近一直在积极探讨上述问题对国际历史实践的影响。英国的学者则远没有那么活跃。该项目将为纠正这种沉默提供一个框架，同时为与政策界以及从学校到大学研究生课程的各级国际史教师的持续接触建立结构。已经确定了一些核心问题，以便为四个为期一天的讲习班提供一个概念框架。来自英国、欧洲、北美和澳大利亚的历史学家和国际关系专家以及外交和联邦事务部官员将参加这些讲习班。该项目产生的主要“产出”将是一个“实地状况"论文集，一个互动的基于网络的国际关系史教学和研究资源，以及与政策利益攸关方接触的持久结构。实现这些目标将使当代和未来几代国际历史学家能够更好地进行教学，研究，并更有效地为应对我们时代不断变化的国际挑战做出贡献。

项目成果

Great Britain in French Policy Conceptions at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919

英国在 1919 年巴黎和会上的法国政策构想

• DOI: 10.1080/09592296.2019.1619039
• 发表时间: 2019
• 期刊: Diplomacy & Statecraft
• 影响因子: 0.4
• 作者: Jackson P

Cultures of Intelligence in the Era of the World Wars

世界大战时代的情报文化

• 发表时间: 2020
• 作者: Mistry K

La conception transatlantique de sécurité du gouvernement Clemenceau à la Conférence de Paix de Paris, 1919

克列孟梭政府和巴黎和平会议的跨大西洋安全构想，1919 年

• DOI: 10.3917/hes.194.0065
• 发表时间: 2019
• 期刊: Histoire, économie & société
• 作者: Jackson P

Histoire et relations internationales

国际历史与关系

• 发表时间: 2020
• 作者: Jackson, P.D.

THE STATE AND THE ASSASSINATION THREAT IN BRITAIN, 1971-1984

英国的国家和暗杀威胁，1971 年至 1984 年

• DOI: 10.1017/s0018246x17000401
• 发表时间: 2017
• 期刊: The Historical Journal
• 作者: BALL S