权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Paul Rodgers Design Priority Area Leadership Fellowship

保罗·罗杰斯设计优先领域领导奖学金

基本信息

批准号：
AH/P013619/1
负责人：
Paul Rodgers
金额：
$ 131.8万
依托单位：
Lancaster University
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2017
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2017 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FP013619%2F1
关键词：
Paul Rodgers Design Priority Area

项目摘要

My vision, throughout this fellowship and in line with the AHRC Design initiative "Design for Change", is to achieve real and long-lasting transformation and impact, to enact alternative, positive, and help achieve real developments within the culture of design research that will equip it for the challenges of the future. This requires more than traditional quantitative and qualitative research. It requires evidence to become informed and intuition to inspire us in imagining and creating new and better possibilities. My aim is to achieve change that will make real differences to the lives of individuals, groups, communities and society as a whole. Working collaboratively with researchers in other disciplinary areas, I will take the lead in identifying opportunities for collaboration, trends in research, and organising events on behalf of the AHRC and work to shape preferred realities and positive future visions around key challenges (e.g. sustainability, health, security, care, poverty) where design thought and action is key. For example, this may involve the co-design and co-development of novel products that will lift people out of poverty. It might include the design of innovative services in care that will improve the health and well being of families across the country. It may comprise the design and development of new policies that will reduce further harm to our planet. My vision will be inclusive in its scope and encourage projects that adopt and utilize an mélange of different types of design research including experimental, practice-based, and hybrid approaches and methods. This will show the various cultures of design research that coexist and celebrate this pluralism in what is rapidly becoming a very healthy and mature field of research. The fellowship role will allow me to encourage and enhance projects under the "Design for Change" banner to utilize research approaches and methods that fit their purpose. "Design for Change" will borrow methods and approaches that fit from the physical sciences, the social sciences, and the arts and humanities if and when the situation arises. Adopting a pluralistic approach will allow for a flexible and open-minded exploration across the breadth of design and other disciplines and will support bringing these cross-disciplinary methodologies and communities together to strengthen the Design research base. By building purposeful relationships design researchers (working with other disciplines, professionals and citizens) will enhance their own and others' abilities to challenge existing economic, social, environmental, and political models. This will help us to understand and strengthen the inter-relations between design research and design practice (i.e. design consultancies / agencies and design teaching), and end-users. Creating, for instance, more sustainable product design, services, and processes, whilst rethinking how policy might work better. Collaboration alone, however, will not be enough. We require shifts in our cultures of co-design, co-innovation, and co-production, collectively deciding and socially organizing the future world that we will all be proud to share. My belief is that design is the best tool that we have for making sense of the complex, multi-faceted world we all inhabit. Design in the way that it can holistically explore, critique, and define what needs to be done, synthesize and propose future scenarios, and present, visualize, and communicate those ideas to others can be at the forefront of shaping preferred realities and future experiences. The objective being to develop mechanisms for enhanced co-design, co-innovation, and co-production, collectively deciding and shaping preferred situations.

我的愿景是，通过这次奖学金，并与AHRC设计倡议“为变化而设计”相一致，实现真正和长期的转变和影响，制定替代的、积极的、并帮助在设计研究文化中实现真正的发展，使其为未来的挑战做好准备。这需要的不仅仅是传统的定量和定性研究。它需要证据变得有见识，需要直觉来激励我们想象和创造新的、更好的可能性。我的目标是实现改变，真正改变个人、群体、社区和整个社会的生活。与其他学科领域的研究人员合作，我将带头确定合作机会、研究趋势，并代表AHRC组织活动，并努力围绕关键挑战(如可持续发展、健康、安全、护理、贫困)形成首选的现实和积极的未来愿景，在这些领域，设计思想和行动是关键。例如，这可能涉及共同设计和共同开发将使人们摆脱贫困的新产品。它可能包括设计创新的护理服务，以改善全国各地家庭的健康和福祉。它可能包括设计和制定新的政策，以减少对我们星球的进一步伤害。我的愿景将在其范围内包容，并鼓励采用和利用不同类型的设计研究的项目，包括实验、基于实践和混合的方法和方法。这将展示共存的设计研究的不同文化，并庆祝这个正在迅速成为一个非常健康和成熟的研究领域的多元化。研究金的角色将使我能够鼓励和加强“为变革而设计”旗帜下的项目，以利用符合其目的的研究途径和方法。“为改变而设计”将借鉴自然科学、社会科学、艺术和人文科学的方法和方法，如果情况出现的话。采用多元化的方法将允许在设计和其他学科的广泛领域进行灵活和开放的探索，并将支持将这些跨学科的方法和社区聚集在一起，以加强设计研究基础。通过建立有目的的关系，设计研究人员(与其他学科、专业人员和公民合作)将提高他们自己和其他人挑战现有经济、社会、环境和政治模式的能力。这将有助于我们了解和加强设计研究和设计实践(即设计顾问/机构和设计教学)和最终用户之间的相互关系。例如，创造更可持续的产品设计、服务和流程，同时重新思考如何使政策发挥更好的作用。然而，仅有合作是不够的。我们需要改变我们共同设计、共同创新和共同制作的文化，共同决定和社会组织我们都将自豪地分享的未来世界。我相信，设计是我们理解我们所居住的复杂的、多方面的世界的最好工具。以这样一种方式进行设计，即它可以全面地探索、批评和定义需要做什么，合成并提出未来的场景，并将这些想法呈现、可视化并与其他人交流，这可能是塑造首选现实和未来体验的前沿。其目标是建立加强共同设计、共同创新和共同生产的机制，共同决定和塑造优先选择的情况。

项目成果

期刊论文数量（10）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

User-Designed Dementia Care Pathways. A disruptive approach to mapping dementia support services

用户设计的痴呆症护理途径。

DOI：
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
0
作者：
Carey D.
通讯作者：
Carey D.

Design for the Unthinkable-World: Strange Ecology and Unwelcome Change

为不可思议的世界设计：奇怪的生态和不受欢迎的变化

DOI：
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
0
作者：
Bremner, C.
通讯作者：
Bremner, C.

Designing for Inclusion: Cross-disciplinarity is the Key to Success

包容性设计：跨学科是成功的关键

DOI：
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
0
作者：
E. Winton
通讯作者：
E. Winton

ImaginationLancaster:Open-Ended, Anti-Disciplinary, Diverse

ImaginationLancaster：开放式、反纪律、多元化

DOI：
10.1016/j.sheji.2018.11.001
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation
影响因子：
0
作者：
R. Cooper;Nick Dunn;P. Coulton;S. Walker;P. Rodgers;Leon Cruikshank;Emmanuel Tsekleves;D. Hands;Roger Whitham;C. Boyko;Daniel Richards;Bijan Aryana;S. Pollastri;M. A. L. Escalante;Bran Knowles;C. Lopez;P. Cureton;C. Coulton
通讯作者：
C. Coulton

Si le design n'est pas la réponse, que pourrait-il être ?

如果设计不是回应，那么它是什么呢？