权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Linking agriculture and land use change to pollinator populations

将农业和土地利用变化与传粉昆虫种群联系起来

基本信息

批准号：
BB/I000364/1
负责人：
William Kunin
金额：
$ 48.97万
依托单位：
University of Leeds
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2011
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2011 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=BB%2FI000364%2F1
关键词：
Linking agriculture land use change

项目摘要

There is growing evidence that both domestic honeybees and wild pollinators are in decline in Britain, as are the wildflowers that they both use for food. We expect these declines are linked, but there is little evidence to demonstrate what the links are, and what can be done to halt or reverse them. Among the most likely explanations for these declines are changes in the way the British landscape is managed: loss of natural habitats and increasingly intensive agricultural practices. We will test for links between such land use changes and the condition of British pollinator populations. One aspect of our work involves examining how pollinator populations and land use have changed over time, to test whether pollinator losses are correlated with landscape changes. This is made difficult because there is no national monitoring programme for pollinators, and so we only have scattered information about pollinator changes. To overcome this problem, we will take two contrasting approaches: (1) comparing how land use has changed in areas where we know pollinator populations either have declined markedly or have not done so, and (2) repeating historical surveys of pollinators in sites chosen to have undergone different amounts of subsequent land use change. A second focus of our work will be on how current land uses link to current honeybee, wild pollinator and wildflower populations. To do so, we need to survey pollinators and wildflowers in sites with very different sets of conditions in a carefully controlled manner. First we will use existing datasets to estimate likely flower densities in different habitats and regions, as well as the distribution of habitat types (and changes in them), various aspects agricultural management (including pesticide usage), and the density of domestic honeybee colonies. We will then choose a set of 96 sites in six clusters across Britain, with sites chosen to represent a wide range of flower resources, different natural and agricultural habitats, different levels of pesticide use, and different numbers of domestic honeybee hives. We will survey wildflower and pollinator populations at these sites, observe how well flowers are pollinated, and test how well honeybees and one wild bee species perform when placed at the different sites. This will be the largest scale survey of flower resources and pollinator communities ever performed. We will then examine how well pollinator populations can be predicted from flower densities, and how both are affected by various aspects of land use and agricultural management. The final aspect of our work will be to apply these findings to make recommendations as to how both domestic honeybees and wild pollinators can best be protected. This will build off of the results of the previous sections, which will provide links between specific land management options and pollinator stocks. Such findings could be of use to farmers, beekeepers, conservationists and policy makers, and so we will involve all four of these communities in the project, involving representatives of each on a project Steering Committee. We will hold workshops both at the beginning of the project (to get ideas for additional issues to study) and at the end of the project (to discuss our findings and their policy implications). We will edit fact-sheets and briefing papers for these different communities, and distribute them in specialist magazines and through a project web site. We will also make information available on a public website, including teaching materials and other resources about pollinator declines.

越来越多的证据表明，在英国，家蜜蜂和野生传粉者都在减少，作为食物的野花也在减少。我们预计这些下降是有联系的，但几乎没有证据表明这些联系是什么，以及可以做些什么来阻止或扭转它们。最可能的解释是英国景观管理方式的变化：自然栖息地的丧失和日益集约化的农业实践。我们将测试这种土地利用变化与英国传粉昆虫种群状况之间的联系。我们工作的一个方面是研究传粉媒介的数量和土地利用如何随着时间的推移而变化，以测试传粉媒介的损失是否与景观变化有关。这很困难，因为没有针对传粉媒介的国家监测计划，所以我们只有关于传粉媒介变化的零散信息。为了克服这一问题，我们将采取两种对比方法：(1)比较我们知道传粉媒介数量明显下降或没有明显下降的地区的土地利用变化情况；(2)在选择的土地利用随后发生不同程度变化的地点重复传粉媒介的历史调查。我们工作的第二个重点将是当前的土地利用如何与当前的蜜蜂、野生传粉者和野花种群联系起来。要做到这一点，我们需要在精心控制的情况下，在条件非常不同的地点调查传粉者和野花。首先，我们将使用现有的数据集来估计不同栖息地和地区可能的花朵密度，以及栖息地类型的分布（及其变化），农业管理（包括农药使用）的各个方面，以及家庭蜜蜂种群的密度。然后，我们将在英国的六个集群中选择一组96个地点，这些地点代表了广泛的花卉资源，不同的自然和农业栖息地，不同的农药使用水平，以及不同数量的家庭蜂箱。我们将调查这些地点的野花和传粉者种群，观察花的授粉情况，并测试蜜蜂和一种野生蜜蜂在不同地点的表现。这将是迄今为止进行的最大规模的花卉资源和传粉者群落调查。然后，我们将研究如何从花的密度预测传粉者的种群，以及它们如何受到土地利用和农业管理的各个方面的影响。我们工作的最后一个方面将是应用这些发现，就如何最好地保护家养蜜蜂和野生传粉者提出建议。这将以前几节的结果为基础，这些结果将提供具体土地管理选择与传粉媒介种群之间的联系。这些发现可能对农民、养蜂人、环保人士和政策制定者有用，因此我们将让这四个社区都参与到这个项目中来，让每个社区的代表参加一个项目指导委员会。我们将在项目开始时（为研究的其他问题征求意见）和项目结束时（讨论我们的发现及其政策含义）举行研讨会。我们将为这些不同的社区编辑实况报告和简报，并通过专业杂志和项目网站分发。我们还将在一个公共网站上提供信息，包括有关传粉媒介减少的教材和其他资源。

项目成果

期刊论文数量（10）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

Species richness declines and biotic homogenisation have slowed down for NW-European pollinators and plants.

DOI：
10.1111/ele.12121
发表时间：
2013-07
期刊：
Ecology letters
影响因子：
8.8
作者：
Carvalheiro LG;Kunin WE;Keil P;Aguirre-Gutiérrez J;Ellis WN;Fox R;Groom Q;Hennekens S;Van Landuyt W;Maes D;Van de Meutter F;Michez D;Rasmont P;Ode B;Potts SG;Reemer M;Roberts SP;Schaminée J;WallisDeVries MF;Biesmeijer JC
通讯作者：
Biesmeijer JC

Pollinator monitoring more than pays for itself

DOI：
10.1111/1365-2664.13755
发表时间：
2020-10-07
期刊：
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Breeze, Tom D.;Bailey, Alison P.;Carvell, Claire
通讯作者：
Carvell, Claire

A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities

DOI：
10.1038/s41559-018-0769-y
发表时间：
2019-03-01
期刊：
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
影响因子：
16.8
作者：
Baldock, Katherine C. R.;Goddard, Mark A.;Memmott, Jane
通讯作者：
Memmott, Jane

Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of floral resources in Britain.

DOI：
10.1038/nature16532
发表时间：
2016-02-04
期刊：
Nature
影响因子：
64.8
作者：
Baude M;Kunin WE;Boatman ND;Conyers S;Davies N;Gillespie MA;Morton RD;Smart SM;Memmott J
通讯作者：
Memmott J

Indirect effects of agricultural pesticide use on parasite prevalence in wild pollinators