课题基金 / 基金详情

CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF POST-MENOPAUSAL ENDOMETRIAL CANCER

CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF POST-MENOPAUSAL ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
绝经后子宫内膜癌的病例对照研究
批准号:
3192711
负责人:
MALCOLM C PIKE
金额:
$24.42万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
1989
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
1989-07-17 至 1994-04-30

项目摘要

项目成果

MALCOLM C PIKE的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
雌激素形式的激素替代疗法(HRT) 替代疗法(ERT)在20世纪60年代和70年代得到了广泛的应用。 20世纪70年代中期的流行病学研究表明,ERT使用 显著增加子宫内膜癌的风险。近期 基于人群的研究表明,乳腺癌的风险可能 也会增加,尽管程度要小得多。这些风险 必须权衡ERT使用的好处,明确 ERT在减少某些更年期症状和 骨质疏松,最重要的是,可能是冠心病 疾病(CHD)风险。为了应对子宫内膜癌的风险 孕激素现在通常被添加到子宫的最后10-14天 28天ERT周期(雌激素-孕激素替代疗法,EPRT)。 ERT对CHD的部分有益作用可能会随着EPRT而丧失, 有人可能会争辩说,乳腺癌的风险可能会增加。 使用EPRT会比使用ERT引起的子宫内膜癌更少,但它不是 明确EPRT的使用将与较少的子宫内膜癌相关 没有HRT;某些论点表明EPRT的使用将 会导致子宫内膜癌风险的显著增加。AS EPRT 受欢迎程度的提高,这显然是重要的,从一个 站在公共卫生的立场,增进我们对 致癌和其他疾病过程,以监测其影响 关于子宫内膜癌、乳腺癌和冠心病风险,以及可能的 其他疾病终点。考虑到可能的不利影响, 孕激素对风险-收益方程中CHD部分的影响 雌激素联合孕激素治疗子宫内膜癌的疗效观察 乳腺癌风险是决定广泛使用 这种疗法是合理的。这项建议的病例对照研究 920例55岁的子宫内膜癌患者--和920名配对的邻居 CONTROLS解决了子宫内膜癌问题。面对面 将进行有组织的访谈:为便于回忆, 所有已售出的ERT和EPRT制剂的相册将 被利用。所有病例都会有盲目的病理切片 由一名病理学家进行审查,以实现诊断的一致性 并允许通过以下确定性对结果进行分组分析 疾病的诊断和程度。我们亦会评估 吸烟、饮食和体力活动与子宫内膜癌的关系 活动。
英文摘要
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT), in the form of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), was widely used in the 1960s and 1970s. In the mid 1970s epidemiologic studies demonstrated that ERT use significantly increased endometrial cancer risk. Recent population-based studies have shown that breast cancer risk may also be increased, although to a much lesser extent. These risks of ERT use have to be balanced against, the clear beneficial effects of ERT in reducing certain menopausal symptoms and osteoporosis, and, most importantly, probably coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. In response to the endometrial cancer risk a progestogen is now commonly added for the last 10-14 days of the 28-day ERT cycle (estrogen-progestogen replacement therapy, EPRT). Part of the beneficial effect of ERT on CHD may be lost with EPRT, and it may be argued that the breast cancer risk may be increased. EPRT use will cause less endometrial cancer than ERT, but it is not clear that EPRT use will be associated with less endometrial cancer than no HRT; certain lines of argument suggest that EPRT use will cause a significant increase in endometrial cancer risk. As EPRT increases in popularity, it is clearly important, both from a public health standpoint and to increase our understanding of carcinogenic and other disease processes, to monitor its effects on endometrial cancer, breast cancer and CHD risk, and possibly other disease endpoints. Given the probable adverse effect of progestogen on the CHD component of the risk-benefit equation, the effect of estrogen-progestogen therapy on endometrial cancer and breast cancer risk is crucial in determining whether widespread use of such therapy is justified. This proposed case-control study of 920 endometrial cancer cases age 55-64 and 920 matched neighborhood controls addresses the endometrial cancer issue. In-person structured interviews will be conducted: to facilitate recall, a photograph album of all ERT and EPRT preparations ever sold will be used. All cases will have their pathology slides blindly reviewed by a single pathologist to attain uniformity of diagnosis and to allow subgroup analysis of the results by certainty of diagnosis and extent of disease. We will also assess the relationships of endometrial cancer to smoking, diet and physical activity.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
GENETIC & ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS FOR BLADDER CANCER
GENETIC & ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS FOR BLADDER CANCER
GENETIC & ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS FOR BLADDER CANCER
GENETIC & ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS FOR BLADDER CANCER
海外基金