课题基金 / 基金详情

Constructive set theory: Models, independence results and mathematics

Constructive set theory: Models, independence results and mathematics
构造性集合论:模型、独立结果和数学
批准号:
EP/G029520/1
负责人:
Michael Rathjen
金额:
$24.95万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2009
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2009 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

Michael Rathjen的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
The history of the development of mathematics can in part be seen as a search for more general and flexible datastructures. First one had the integers, then the rational, real and complex numbers, the general concept of function, and eventually arbitrary sets. Bourbaki undertook the formidable task of producing a ``fully axiomatised presentationof mathematics in entirety and has said ``... all mathematics theories may be regarded as extensions of the generaltheory of sets ... . The emergence of category theory has somewhat changed the perspective just described. The category-theorists attitude is that the category of sets of classical set theory, SET, is just one category that can serve as a general universe of mathematical discourse but that there are many other categories, called toposes, thatlook and behave like SET. One of the primary sources of topos theory is algebraic geometry, in particular the studyof sheaves. One may think of a topos (e.g. the category of sheaves over a topological space) as a generalized set-theoretic universe or universe of discourse, with the classical set universe being merely a special case. Perhapsthe most important step in understanding toposes consists in realizing that each topos carries its own logical calculus. It turns out that this calculus may differ from classical logic, and in general the logical principles that holdin a topos are those of constructive logic (also known as intuitionistic logic). Since each topos provides its own notion of set, set theory based on constructive logic emerges naturally in topos theory. As a result, constructive proof procedures in set theory have the effect of extending validity of mathematical reasoning to the widest possiblecontext.While set theory is identified with rigour and has earned the status of providing a full scale system for formalizing mathematics it has a reputation for being non-computational and nonconstructive. This is to some extent true for classical set theory but there is nothing intrinsically non-constructive and non-computational about sets. Constructive set theory (and mathematics) distinguishes itself from its traditional counterpart, classical set theory,by insisting that proofs of existential theorems in mathematics respect constructive existence: that an existentialclaim must afford means for constructing an instance of it. The foundations of a systematic approach to constructivemathematics, known as intuitionism, were laid in Brouwer's response to the foundational crisis in mathematics at the beginning of the 20th century. Nowadays, in computer science, constructive formal systems based on type theory, or on the Curry-Howard isomorphism have become increasingly widespread for program development and language design. Within the Curry-Howard paradigm, propositions are viewed as types and constructive proofs of propositions are viewed as inhabitants of their respective types, thereby connecting the concepts of programme and constructive proof in an algebraic way. Constructive set theory, CST, constitutes a major site of interaction between constructivism, set theory, proof theory, type theory, topos theory and computer science. It provides a set theoretical framework for the development of constructive mathematics and a refining framework within which distinctions between notions, which are not apparent in the classical context, become revealed.There are central questions that have guided researchers in classical Cantorian set theory over the last 50 years. The objective of this project is to pursue central questions for constructive set theory, some of which have been long-standing open problems.
期刊论文(10)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Logic, Construction, Computation -
逻辑、构造、计算 -
DOI: 10.1515/9783110324921.123
发表时间: 2012
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: [Curi G]
通讯作者: Curi G
Constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory and the limited principle of omniscience
构造性策梅洛-弗兰克尔集合论和全知有限原理
DOI: 10.1016/j.apal.2013.08.001
发表时间: 2014
期刊: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
影响因子: 0.8
作者: [Rathjen M]
通讯作者: Rathjen M
The Friedman-Sheard programme in intuitionistic logic
直觉逻辑中的弗里德曼-谢尔德纲领
DOI: 10.2178/jsl/1344862162
发表时间: 2014
期刊: The Journal of Symbolic Logic
影响因子: --
作者: [Leigh G]
通讯作者: Leigh G
Lifschitz realizability for intuitionistic Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory
直觉 Zermelo-Fraenkel 集合论的 Lifschitz 可实现性
DOI: 10.1007/s00153-012-0299-2
发表时间: 2012
期刊: Archive for Mathematical Logic
影响因子: 0.3
作者: [Chen R]
通讯作者: Chen R
Homotopical inductive types
  • 批准号:
    EP/K023128/1
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $36.16万
  • 财政年份:
    2013
  • 负责人:
    Michael Rathjen
  • 依托单位:
WORKSHOP: LEEDS SYMPOSIUM ON PROOF THEORY & CONSTRUCTIVISM
  • 批准号:
    EP/G058024/1
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $2.09万
  • 财政年份:
    2009
  • 负责人:
    Michael Rathjen
  • 依托单位:
Constructive Set Theory: Forcing, Large Sets, and Mathematics
Mathematical Sciences: Proof-Theoretical Investigations of Theories
国内基金
海外基金
AEP剪切SET参与阿尔茨海默症Tau病变机制研究
选择性SET7/9抑制剂的设计优化及缺血性脑损伤保护机制
  • 批准号:
  • 项目类别:
    省市级项目
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 批准年份:
    2025
  • 负责人:
    昌军
  • 依托单位:
C-KIT激酶区突变调控SET在儿童急性髓系白血病耐药中的作用及机制研究
  • 批准号:
    JCZRLH202500940
  • 项目类别:
    省市级项目
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 批准年份:
    2025
  • 负责人:
  • 依托单位:
SET7通过调控糖酵解和氧化还原稳态参与PE发生发展的作用及机制研究
  • 批准号:
  • 项目类别:
    省市级项目
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 批准年份:
    2025
  • 负责人:
    唐金花
  • 依托单位: