How different are direct mail and telephoning? A 'Get Out The Vote' randomised experiment in the 2009 European and Local elections

直邮和电话有何不同？

• 批准号: ES/F040466/1
• 负责人: Edward Fieldhouse
• 金额: $ 10.54万
• 依托单位: University of Manchester
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2009
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2009 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FF040466%2F1
• 关键词: How; different; direct; mail; telephoning

Abstracts are not currently available in GtR for all funded research. This is normally because the abstract was not required at the time of proposal submission, but may be because it included sensitive information such as personal details.

目前，所有资助研究的摘要都不能在GTR中找到。这通常是因为在提交提案时并不需要摘要，但可能是因为它包含了个人详细信息等敏感信息。

项目成果

When Context Matters: Assessing Geographical Heterogeneity of Get-Out-The-Vote Treatment Effects Using a Population Based Field Experiment

当背景很重要时：使用基于人群的现场实验评估投票处理效果的地理异质性

• DOI: 10.1007/s11109-013-9226-4
• 发表时间: 2013
• 期刊: Political Behavior
• 影响因子: 3.9
• 作者: Fieldhouse E

Do impersonal mobilisation methods work? : evidence from a get-out-the-vote experiment from the 2009 English European elections

非个人动员方法有效吗？

• 作者: Edward Fieldhouse (Author)

Do impersonal mobilisation methods work? Evidence from a nationwide Get-Out-the-Vote experiment in England

非个人动员方法有效吗？

• DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.09.003
• 发表时间: 2013
• 期刊: Electoral Studies
• 影响因子: 2.3
• 作者: Fieldhouse E