Agendas and Interest Groups
议程和兴趣小组
基本信息
- 批准号:ES/N018915/1
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 61.38万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:英国
- 项目类别:Research Grant
- 财政年份:2016
- 资助国家:英国
- 起止时间:2016 至 无数据
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:
项目摘要
The influence of interest groups in politics poses potential threats to democracy. The challenges of collective action predict that the groups most likely to be represented will have concentrated economic interests or intensely held beliefs, resulting in policies at odds with general public opinion. While such biases in representation are clear in theory, there is scant systematic evidence of disproportionate influence over government by a subset of interest groups. Further, social scientists know little about the degree of correspondence between the political preferences of interest groups and those of the public. Agendas and Interest Groups is a comparative project that for the first time will address concerns about the role of interest group influence by focusing attention on policy agendas and analyzing the circumstances under which specific types of groups and citizens find their issues represented before government. To estimate the degree of congruence between the concerns of citizens and the policy agendas of interest groups and government, we will interview representatives from a random sample of 100 interest groups in each of our four countries, survey the general public in each country about their policy wishes, and track three specific issues in each of three policy areas in each country. In mapping each country's public, group, and government agendas, we aim to address normatively important questions about the extent and causes of inequalities in representation.
利益集团在政治中的影响对民主构成潜在威胁。集体行动的挑战预示着,最有可能被代表的群体将拥有集中的经济利益或强烈的信仰,导致政策与公众舆论不一致。虽然这种代表性的偏见在理论上是明确的,但很少有系统的证据表明,一个利益集团的子集对政府的影响不成比例。此外,社会科学家对利益集团的政治偏好与公众的政治偏好之间的对应程度知之甚少。《利益集团和利益集团》是一个比较项目,将首次关注政策议程,分析特定类型的群体和公民在政府面前代表自己的问题的情况,从而解决对利益集团影响作用的担忧。为了评估公民的关注与利益集团和政府的政策议程之间的一致程度,我们将从我们四个国家的100个利益集团中随机抽样采访代表,调查每个国家的公众对他们的政策意愿,并跟踪每个国家三个政策领域中的三个具体问题。在绘制每个国家的公共,团体和政府议程时,我们的目标是解决有关代表性不平等的程度和原因的规范性重要问题。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(1)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Opaque: an empirical evaluation of lobbying transparency in the UK
- DOI:10.1057/s41309-019-00074-9
- 发表时间:2020-03-01
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:0.8
- 作者:McKay, Amy Melissa;Wozniak, Antal
- 通讯作者:Wozniak, Antal
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Amy McKay其他文献
What do campaign contributions buy? Lobbyists’ strategic giving
- DOI:
10.1057/s41309-018-0031-7 - 发表时间:
2018-03-09 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:1.500
- 作者:
Amy McKay - 通讯作者:
Amy McKay
A multicenter, outpatient, open-label study to evaluate the dosing, effectiveness, and safety of topiramate as monotherapy in the treatment of epilepsy in clinical practice
一项多中心、门诊、开放标签研究,旨在评估临床实践中托吡酯作为单一疗法治疗癫痫的剂量、有效性和安全性
- DOI:
10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.06.021 - 发表时间:
2009 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:2.6
- 作者:
R. Sankar;E. Ramsay;Amy McKay;J. Hulihan;F. Wiegand - 通讯作者:
F. Wiegand
Who walks through the revolving door? Examining the lobbying activity of former members of Congress
- DOI:
10.1057/iga.2015.16 - 发表时间:
2016-01-14 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:1.500
- 作者:
Jeffrey Lazarus;Amy McKay;Lindsey Herbel - 通讯作者:
Lindsey Herbel
Amy McKay的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
相似海外基金
Competing Societies and Conflicting Demands in Education Practice and Policy in India: Unravelling the relative powers of alternate interest groups an
印度教育实践和政策中的竞争社会和冲突需求:揭示不同利益集团的相对权力和
- 批准号:
2449652 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 61.38万 - 项目类别:
Studentship
Pluralistic Representation by the Upper House in Japan - the second chamber for interest groups -
日本参议院的多元化代表权——利益集团的第二议院——
- 批准号:
17J05103 - 财政年份:2017
- 资助金额:
$ 61.38万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows
Agendas and Interest Groups in Germany: The mediating role of parties and the media
德国的议程和利益集团:政党和媒体的调解作用
- 批准号:
278877519 - 财政年份:2016
- 资助金额:
$ 61.38万 - 项目类别:
Research Grants
Change or presistence of interest representation in the EU? British, French, German, Polish and EU interest groups in comparative perspective (EUROLOB II)
欧盟利益代表的变化或存在?
- 批准号:
204208105 - 财政年份:2011
- 资助金额:
$ 61.38万 - 项目类别:
Research Grants
The politics of framing in the European Union: the role of national interest groups
欧盟的政治框架:国家利益集团的作用
- 批准号:
183850568 - 财政年份:2011
- 资助金额:
$ 61.38万 - 项目类别:
Research Grants
Foreign Interest Groups and American Foreign Policy.
外国利益集团和美国外交政策。
- 批准号:
1023967 - 财政年份:2010
- 资助金额:
$ 61.38万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Conservative parties and interest groups in postwar Japan : A case study on the NIHON IZOKUKAI(The Association for War Bereaved Families)
战后日本的保守党派和利益集团:以日本家属会为例
- 批准号:
20830093 - 财政年份:2008
- 资助金额:
$ 61.38万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (Start-up)
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Friends of the Supreme Court: Examining the Influence of Interest Groups in the U.S. Supreme Court, 1946-2001
博士论文研究:最高法院之友:考察利益集团在美国最高法院的影响力,1946-2001
- 批准号:
0350416 - 财政年份:2004
- 资助金额:
$ 61.38万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
The Tin Industry and the Interest Groups in Early Modern London
近代早期伦敦的锡工业和利益集团
- 批准号:
16520446 - 财政年份:2004
- 资助金额:
$ 61.38万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Public choice analysis for the behaviors of bureaucrats, political parties and interest groups around food policies
官僚、政党和利益集团围绕粮食政策的行为的公共选择分析
- 批准号:
15580192 - 财政年份:2003
- 资助金额:
$ 61.38万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)