权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Learning from Domestic Homicide Reviews using Experience Based Co-Design

使用基于经验的协同设计从家庭凶杀案评论中学习

基本信息

批准号：
ES/S005471/2
负责人：
Khatidja Chantler
金额：
$ 51.35万
依托单位：
Manchester Metropolitan University
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2020
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2020 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FS005471%2F2
关键词：
Learning Domestic Homicide Reviews using

项目摘要

The proposed study addresses important gaps in existing knowledge of domestic homicide and aims to learn from the experiences of families who have lost a relative to domestic homicide, victims/survivors of domestic abuse; professionals and domestic homicide reviews (DHRs) to document, analyse, map, and influence policy and practice to prevent future domestic homicides. The definition of domestic homicide used in this study will follow that of the Home Office (2016) guidance. To build comprehensive knowledge of the learning from DHRs, the study is organised in three work packages: In Work Package 1 we will conduct a systematic literature review of i) international approaches to the review of domestic homicides; ii) identify key learning from international DHRs and iii) investigate any resultant initiatives from the DHRs, focusing on their impact. In Work Package 2 we will firstly retrieve and use a quantitative approach to analyse all publicly available DHRs from 322 Community Safety Partnerships (CSPs) in England & Wales post June 2016 (approximately 200) to add to our existing dataset and preliminary analysis of 141 DHRs (collected from July 2011 - June 2016). We will refine the template created in our pilot study to identify and extract variables from DHRs to feed into SPSS. Descriptive analysis will be carried out to generate frequencies and proportions, with cross-tabulation of key variables. Statistical tests will also be used to identify key trends and risk factors. Secondly, we will conduct an in-depth qualitative analysis of a sample of DHRs of: i) adult family homicides; ii) complex cases where domestic abuse co-exists with substance misuse, mental health or disability; iii) families with children under 18; iv) black and minority ethnic families; v) analyse the recommendations made in DHRs in the above and vi) create an open access repository of DHRs. Sample sizes for the subsets will be worked out once all DHRs have been collected and categorised. These subsets are based on our preliminary analysis of DHRs (Chantler et al, forthcoming) and existing DHR literature. This work package will provide a large scale analysis of DHRs as well as a focussed analysis of specific sub-sets and can be utilised to inform prevention and risk management of domestic abuse cases that may lead to homicide.Work Package 3 employs an experience-based co-design (EBCD) approach, an innovative, action orientated methodology bringing an additional dimension to interrogate the utility, learning and future development of services from domestic homicide reviews. Gwent and Lancashire (covering 19 CSPs) will act as study sites for the EBCD component. EBCD is a staged process involving gathering experiences and views of i) family members who have lost a relative to domestic homicide; ii) survivors of domestic abuse who have experienced assaults or stalking. Twenty one-to-one in-depth video interviews will be conducted which will be analysed using the Listening Guide method (Gilligan & Brown 1991) to identify 'touch points' to illustrate the journeys of victims, families, good practice and lost opportunities for intervention. The videos will be edited down in consultation with participants to create a digital story as the basis for conjoint activities to develop new ways of working. Twenty interviews will also be conducted with professionals who have worked with victims or been involved in DHRs and these will be analysed thematically. Following the analysis of WP1 and 2, and the identification of themes from interviews, a full day event will be convened with the two CSP networks to share the learning and to identify priorities for action. An advisory group comprising representatives of Social Work, Policing, Health, CSPs, AAFDA, Safe-Net, AGENDA, survivors, academic experts, Home Office and authors and quality assurers of DHRs will provide expertise, help with recruitment and are key to dissemination and impact.

拟议的研究解决了家庭杀人现有知识的重要差距，旨在学习家庭杀人，家庭虐待受害者/幸存者的家庭的经验;专业人员和家庭杀人审查（DHR）记录，分析，映射和影响政策和实践，以防止未来的家庭杀人。本研究中使用的家庭凶杀案的定义将遵循内政部（2016）指南的定义。为了全面了解从人权报告中吸取的经验教训，这项研究分为三个工作包：在工作包1中，我们将对以下方面进行系统的文献审查：㈠审查国内凶杀案的国际方法; ㈡确定从国际人权报告中吸取的主要经验教训; ㈢调查人权报告产生的任何举措，重点是其影响。在工作包2中，我们将首先检索并使用定量方法分析2016年6月后英格兰和威尔士322个社区安全合作伙伴关系（CSP）的所有公开可用的DHR（约200），以添加到我们现有的数据集和141个DHR的初步分析（从2011年7月收集到2016年6月）。我们将完善在试点研究中创建的模板，以从DHR中识别和提取变量，并将其输入SPSS。将进行描述性分析，以生成频率和比例，并对关键变量进行交叉制表。还将使用统计检验来确定关键趋势和风险因素。第二，我们将对下列人权报告样本进行深入的定性分析：一）成年人家庭凶杀案;二）家庭虐待与药物滥用、精神健康或残疾并存的复杂案件;三）有18岁以下儿童的家庭;四）黑人和少数民族家庭;五）分析上述人权报告中提出的建议;六）建立一个开放的人权报告储存库。一旦收集并分类了所有DHR，将确定子集的样本量。这些子集基于我们对DHR（Chantler等人，即将出版）和现有DHR文献的初步分析。该工作包将提供对DHR的大规模分析以及对特定子集的集中分析，并可用于为可能导致杀人的家庭虐待案件的预防和风险管理提供信息。工作包3采用基于经验的协同设计（EBCD）方法，这是一种创新的，以行动为导向的方法，为询问实用程序带来了额外的维度，从国内凶杀案审查中学习和未来发展服务。Gwent和Lancashire（涵盖19个CSP）将作为EBCD部分的研究中心。EBCD是一个分阶段的过程，涉及收集i）在家庭凶杀中失去亲属的家庭成员的经验和意见; ii）经历过攻击或跟踪的家庭虐待幸存者。将进行20次一对一的深入视频访谈，将使用倾听指南方法（Gilligan和Brown，1991年）进行分析，以确定“接触点”，说明受害者的历程、家庭、良好做法和失去的干预机会。将与与会者协商，对视频进行编辑，以创建一个数字故事，作为联合活动的基础，以发展新的工作方式。还将与曾与受害者打过交道或参与人权报告的专业人员进行20次访谈，并将按主题对这些访谈进行分析。在对工作方案1和2进行分析并从访谈中确定主题之后，将与萨赫勒农药委员会的两个网络举行一整天的活动，以分享经验教训并确定行动优先事项。一个由社会工作、警务、卫生、社区服务项目、AAFDA、安全网、AGENDA、幸存者、学术专家、内政部和人权报告的作者和质量保证人组成的咨询小组将提供专门知识，帮助招聘，并对传播和影响至关重要。