课题基金 / 基金详情

The impact of impact: How research value is created and assessed in the UK, US and Australia

The impact of impact: How research value is created and assessed in the UK, US and Australia
影响力的影响:英国、美国和澳大利亚如何创造和评估研究价值
批准号:
ES/V004123/1
负责人:
Alexandra Pollitt
金额:
$69.15万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2021
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2021 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Context and aimsAs universities become bound up in a public role as drivers of economic prosperity, there has been a global policy shift towards measuring the value and benefit of publicly funded research. Governments have invested substantial resources in assessing research impact despite contestation around definitions, methodologies and processes. The rapid channelling of resources into impact has resulted in an under-theorised field that is largely dominated by pragmatic research policy concerns (i.e. focused on procedures and mechanisms). What is missing is a more nuanced conceptualisation of the societal value of research impact, which is essential in ensuring that research investment leads to meaningful societal outcomes. To capture this value, theoretically informed empirical insights into impact and the effects of its assessment on research cultures are needed. This, in turn, can inform the responsible evaluation of publicly funded research.This will be the first large-scale comparative study examining research impact across countries. The project will compare academic cultures in three countries involved in the international push for the assessment of research impact; the UK, US and Australia, which utilise substantially different assessment models. The project will develop a theoretical understanding of research impact and its measurement. It will identify the effects of national research impact assessment policies and practices, and ascertain how they shape the ways research is done and their consequences for knowledge.Potential applications and benefitsThere is a pressing need for in-depth studies of the institutional and individual effects of research evaluation to interrogate frequently uncritical acceptance of dominant forms of valuation. This study will be novel in its examination of the powerful rhetoric of value that dominates discussions of research impact, and in its articulation of the challenges involved in the audit and commodification of academic research. This research will advance sociological and political understandings of research value, and will contribute theoretically informed knowledge to the applied fields of research evaluation and public policy. It will examine the emerging cultural patterns that surround research impact, and shed light on the political processes of decision-making and authority around impact policies. The study will shape the academic debate on the impact cultures of the UK, US and Australia, and contribute to a larger debate on the value of publicly funded research.The study has strong potential to influence the policies that determine how impact is measured and how publicly funded research is governed in the UK, US, Australia and globally. By working directly with stakeholders including science policymakers, research funders and researchers, it will inform debate on the role of universities and research in society and facilitate more robust, reflexive and ethical research systems. It will provide recommendations on the structures and resources that policymakers, funders and higher education leaders could make available to researchers to support them in achieving high-quality research that makes a meaningful contribution to society. Understanding research impact and its assessment is of critical importance, not only strategically for UK, US and Australian governments, but also for countries with similar or emerging evaluation and funding models. It will allow countries to be intentional about creating responsive, equitable research systems that promote core values, such as a dual focus on research excellence and societal benefit. Outputs from the study will include dissemination to policymakers, practitioners and the wider public through events for stakeholders, a working paper, a policy brief, blogs and media articles and a project website. Academic dissemination will occur through conference participation and open access articles in top journals.
期刊论文(6)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
What counts: Making sense of metrics of research value
重要的是:理解研究价值的指标
DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scac004
发表时间: 2022
期刊: Science and Public Policy
影响因子: 2.7
作者: [Williams K]
通讯作者: Williams K
sj-pdf-1-bds-10.1177_20539517231180577 - Supplemental material for Investigating hybridity in artificial intelligence research
sj-pdf-1-bds-10.1177_20539517231180577 - 用于调查人工智能研究中的混合性的补充材料
DOI: 10.25384/sage.23642271
发表时间: 2023
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: [Williams K]
通讯作者: Williams K
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288469
发表时间: 2023
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者: []
通讯作者:
Understanding, measuring, and encouraging public policy research impact
了解、衡量和鼓励公共政策研究的影响
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8500.12506
发表时间: 2021
期刊: Australian Journal of Public Administration
影响因子: 2.2
作者: [Williams K]
通讯作者: Williams K
6
    海外基金