Human infection challenge vaccine (HIC-vac) network
Human infection challenge vaccine (HIC-vac) network
批准号:
MR/R005982/1
负责人:
Peter Openshaw
金额:
$308.3万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2017
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2017 至 --
中文摘要
尽管疫苗每年在全球挽救数百万人的生命,但仍有许多传染病导致大量人死亡,这些疾病仍然无法通过疫苗接种来预防。在连基本的医院治疗都无法获得的中低收入国家尤其如此,唯一现实的选择是通过寻找经济上可行的新疫苗来预防传染病。几百年来,英国在通过人体实验取得原创性科学发现方面一直领先世界。虽然使人感染病原体显然存在风险,但这些风险需要与能够通过实验测试疫苗而无需等待人们自然感染的巨大优势相平衡。我们网络的核心是与这些LMIC的科学家密切合作,向监管机构、政策制定者和公众倡导这些研究的价值,然后支持科学家进行这些研究。开发一种新疫苗通常需要20年时间,耗资超过10亿英镑。利用实验性挑战研究,可以获得明确的结果,表明疫苗仅对少数志愿者(可能是10到100人)有效或无效。以这种方式进行挑战研究,原则上可以证明疫苗的效力。相比之下,证明疫苗有效所需的实地研究可能是巨大的,通常涉及数千人,成本是人体挑战研究的许多倍。从伦理上讲,人类挑战的好处需要与引起疾病的意图仔细权衡。这将可检测的感染范围缩小到那些疾病相对轻微或可预测和自限性的疾病,或可通过现有药物或支持性护理轻松可靠地治疗的疾病。英国正在进行的人类感染研究包括流感、呼吸道合胞病毒、鼻病毒、伤寒、疟疾、细菌性肺炎和百日咳。虽然还有一些问题需要克服,但如果能够进行人体挑战,针对寨卡病毒、登革热和中东呼吸综合征等新出现病毒的疫苗开发将大大加快。疫苗领域正在进入一个非常激动人心的阶段,因为在动物研究中出现的许多免疫学概念现在已经准备好在人体上进行试验。目前,在伦敦、牛津、利物浦、约克、诺丁汉和南安普顿等英国各地的研究小组,在没有提供相互支持的结构的情况下进行此类研究,面临着伦理和监管方面的挑战。我们有很多东西需要相互学习,不仅是关于实验技术,还有如何克服监管和安全工作实践的巨大而必要的负担。有一些研究类似感染的小组,但他们之间不共享试剂、检测过的病原体或其他资源。我们提议的网络将汇集所有这些专业知识,以我们从公众那里获得的支持为基础,用信息丰富和控制良好的人类研究取代动物实验,带来人类感染志愿者网络和监管/伦理网络的统一声音,以加强英国作为最宽容和最支持疫苗开发环境的地位。为此,我们将共同努力:定期举行电话会议、面对面会议,并相互提供实际支持。我们将在网络内组成财团,申请资助,以提供核心材料和资源。除了加速疫苗开发之外,HIC-Vac还将合作解决有关人类感染的基本科学问题,这些问题只能从英国国内和国际上的挑战研究中获得。所有这些工作都与折磨低收入人群的疾病有关;因此,如果得到资助,我们拟议的网络将为改善全球健康作出非常大的贡献。
英文摘要
Although vaccines save millions of lives around the globe every year, there are many infectious diseases that still kill large numbers of people that are still not preventable by vaccination. This is especially true in low and middle income countries (LMIC) where even basic hospital treatment is unavailable, and the only realistic option is to prevent infectious diseases by finding new and economically viable vaccines. For several hundred years the UK has led the world in making original scientific discoveries by human experimentation. Although there are clearly risks in infecting people with pathogens, these risks need to be balanced against the great advantage of being able to test vaccines experimentally without waiting for people to acquire infections naturally. Central to our network is a close collaboration with scientists in these LMIC to advocate for the value of these studies with regulators, policy makers and the public and then to support scientists to perform the studies.Developing a new vaccine typically takes 20 years and costs over £1bn. Using experimental challenge studies, definitive results can be obtained showing that a vaccine works or does not work with only a few volunteers - perhaps 10 to 100. Conducting challenge studies in this way allows proof in principle of vaccine efficacy. By contrast, field studies that are needed to prove that a vaccine works can be vast, usually involving thousands of individuals and costing many times more than a human challenge study.Ethically, the benefits of human challenge need to be weighed carefully against the intention to cause disease. This narrows the range of infections that can be tested to those where the disease is relatively mild or predictable and self-limiting, or diseases that can be easily and reliably treated by existing drugs or supportive care. Examples of human infection studies that are on-going in the United Kingdom include influenza, RSV, rhinovirus, typhoid, malaria, bacterial pneumonia and whooping cough. Although there are problems to be overcome, vaccine development for emerging viruses such as Zika, dengue and MERS would be greatly accelerated if human challenge could be performed.The field of vaccines is entering a very exciting stage in that many immunological concepts that have emerged from studies in animals are now ready for testing in man. At present the groups around the UK, in London, Oxford, Liverpool, York, Nottingham and Southampton, face the ethical and regulatory challenges to mounting such studies without a structure to provide mutual support. We have a great deal to learn from one another regarding not only experimental techniques but also how to overcome the large but necessary burden of regulation and safe working practices. There are groups working on similar infections but not sharing reagents, tested pathogens or other resources between them. Our proposed network will bring together all of this expertise, build on the support that we have from the public in replacing animal experimentation with informative and well controlled human studies, bringing a unified voice from the human infection volunteer network and regulatory/ethical networks to reinforce the UK's position as the most permissive and supportive environment for vaccine development.We will do this by uniting our efforts: holding regular meetings by phone, face to face and providing one another with practical support. We will form consortia within the Network to apply for funding to provide core materials and resources. In addition to accelerating vaccine development, HIC-Vac will collaborate to address fundamental scientific questions about human infection that can only be obtained from challenge studies both within the UK and internationally. All of this work is relevant to diseases that afflict LMIC; if funded, our proposed network will therefore contribute very substantially to improving global health.
期刊论文(10)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.11.003
发表时间:
2021-01
期刊:
Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Baay M, Lina B, Fontanet A, Marchant A, Saville M, Sabot P, Vandeputte J, Neels P]
通讯作者:
Neels P
DOI:
10.1186/s13690-021-00650-z
发表时间:
2021-07-05
期刊:
Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Alabi A, Hussain M, Hoogerwerf MA, Mengome CN, Egesa M, Driciru E, Wammes LJ, Kruize YCM, Sartono E, Adegnika AA, Kremsner PG, Yazdanbakhsh M, Agnandji ST]
通讯作者:
Agnandji ST
DOI:
10.1093/bib/bbab055
发表时间:
2021-09-02
期刊:
Briefings in bioinformatics
影响因子:
9.5
作者:
[Chelysheva I, Pollard AJ, O'Connor D]
通讯作者:
O'Connor D
Public attitudes to a human challenge study with SARS-CoV-2: a mixed-methods study.
公众对SARS-COV-2:混合方法研究的人类挑战研究的态度。
DOI:
10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17516.1
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
Wellcome open research
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Barker C, Collet K, Gbesemete D, Piggin M, Watson D, Pristerà P, Lawerence W, Smith E, Bahrami-Hessari M, Johnson H, Baker K, Qavi A, McGrath C, Chiu C, Read RC, Ward H]
通讯作者:
Ward H
HIC-Vac Network additional funding
-
批准号:MR/Y033736/1
-
项目类别:Research Grant
-
资助金额:$166.57万
-
财政年份:2023
-
负责人:Peter Openshaw
-
依托单位:
COPD-like airway inflammation during RSV infection of older volunteers: INFLAMMAGE
-
批准号:MR/T50256X/1
-
项目类别:Research Grant
-
资助金额:$151.6万
-
财政年份:2019
-
负责人:Peter Openshaw
-
依托单位:
COPD-like airway inflammation during RSV infection of older volunteers: INFLAMMAGE
-
批准号:MR/R502121/1
-
项目类别:Research Grant
-
资助金额:$13.25万
-
财政年份:2017
-
负责人:Peter Openshaw
-
依托单位:
MOSAIC - cohort of hospitalised H1N1 patients
-
批准号:MC_G1001212
-
项目类别:Intramural
-
资助金额:$195.72万
-
财政年份:2010
-
负责人:Peter Openshaw
-
依托单位:
国内基金
海外基金
登录
查看更多内容
基于健康行为改变整合理论的艾滋病感染者自我管理生态圈网络系统构建与初步应用
-
批准号:
-
项目类别:省市级项目
-
资助金额:--
-
批准年份:2025
-
负责人:朱志红
-
依托单位:
肠道菌群介导的脱氧胆酸激活S1PR2/NLRP3/IL-1β通路在炎症性肠病合并艰难梭菌感染中的致病机制研究
-
批准号:82372306
-
项目类别:面上项目
-
资助金额:48.00万元
-
批准年份:2023
-
负责人:彭奕冰
-
依托单位:
牙周炎对腹主动脉瘤的作用和机制研究
-
批准号:82370953
-
项目类别:面上项目
-
资助金额:48.00万元
-
批准年份:2023
-
负责人:朱亚琴
-
依托单位:
基于质谱贴片的病原菌标志物检测及伤口感染诊断应用
-
批准号:82372148
-
项目类别:面上项目
-
资助金额:60.00万元
-
批准年份:2023
-
负责人:黄琳
-
依托单位:
DNA糖苷酶OGG1调节PARP1介导的EB病毒潜伏蛋白表达的机制研究
-
批准号:32000546
-
项目类别:青年科学基金项目
-
资助金额:24.0万元
-
批准年份:2020
-
负责人:郝文静
-
依托单位:
结核分枝杆菌感染巨噬细胞后自噬相关LncRNA分子的筛选及其调控机制研究
-
批准号:31760326
-
项目类别:地区科学基金项目
-
资助金额:36.0万元
-
批准年份:2017
-
负责人:邓光存
-
依托单位:
基于反式互补的新型丙型肝炎病毒细胞感染模型的建立及其在丙肝研究中的应用
-
批准号:31170149
-
项目类别:面上项目
-
资助金额:58.0万元
-
批准年份:2011
-
负责人:钟劲
-
依托单位:
microRNA对机体抗病毒固有免疫应答RIG-I信号途径的调控作用及机制研究
-
批准号:31170826
-
项目类别:面上项目
-
资助金额:70.0万元
-
批准年份:2011
-
负责人:侯晋
-
依托单位:
丙型肝炎病毒感染宿主细胞的分子生物学研究
-
批准号:30870127
-
项目类别:面上项目
-
资助金额:40.0万元
-
批准年份:2008
-
负责人:钟劲
-
依托单位: