权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Comparative venom transcriptomics of centipedes: evolutionary diversification of a key ecological adaptation

蜈蚣的比较毒液转录组学：关键生态适应的进化多样化

基本信息

批准号：
NE/I001530/1
负责人：
Ronald Jenner
金额：
$ 7.51万
依托单位：
Natural History Museum
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2011
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2011 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=NE%2FI001530%2F1
关键词：
Comparative venom transcriptomics centipedes evolutionary

项目摘要

Although most lay people have little problem in identifying creatures like jellyfish, wasps, spiders, and scorpions as potentially dangerous venomous organisms, far fewer know that the ca. 3,300 species of centipedes possess potent venoms. A pair of strong venom claws is located just behind the head, and they house large venom glands that contain complex cocktails of venom components. Unfortunately we know almost nothing about the make-up of centipede venom, which leaves not only a large hole in our understanding of an ecologically important group, but it also compromises our general understanding of venom evolution in the animal kingdom. This study aims to remedy this ignorance by performing the first extensive and intensive analysis of the composition of centipede venoms. This project will take a genetic approach, and will characterize the toxin profiles from the venoms of five species of centipedes. These five species have been chosen to represent all major groups of centipedes. For each species, up to half a million mRNA sequences will be characterized. These precursor molecules are the templates for the production of toxin proteins. By comparing the profiles of these sequences across the selected species we can start to address important questions relating to the evolution of venoms and venomous organisms. The most basic question that can be answered is simply: what toxins are expressed in the venom glands of centipedes? The answer to this question will be the basis for answering the other questions. Does centipede venom have many toxins in common with the venoms of other groups? We already know from previous research that different groups of venomous animals can recruit many similar toxins into their venom. They do this by taking a gene coding for a normal body protein, duplicating it, and expressing one of the copies specifically in the venom gland. Changes in the sequence of the gene can create changes in the protein, and this can change the protein's function to be more effective as a toxin. Preliminary work, however, has suggested that centipede venom may contain many toxins not (yet?) found in other groups. This study will allow us to see how many venom components in centipedes are unique to them. Another major question that can be addressed with the new data is whether the diversification of the centipede species and their toxins went hand in hand. By integrating the family trees of the toxin genes and the centipedes we can infer whether particular episodes in the evolution of centipedes are associated with bouts of toxin evolution as well. We can also infer, by incorporating data from other venomous and non-venomous animals, from what kind of genes the toxin genes in centipedes have evolved. Since there were no centipede data available till now, we can broadly reassess our current understanding of the pattern of toxin in evolution across all animals. We can use the new data also to ask what kinds of processes were important in shaping the composition of centipede venom. One factor that is likely to be important is the range of different kinds of prey the centipede eats. A species tackling a broad range of prey may be expected to have a greater diversity of toxins than a species specializing in just a particular prey species. By correlating venom composition with the diversity of prey identified in their guts we can begin to answer this question. Lastly, by looking at what kinds of changes have occurred in the toxin sequences, and in which parts of them, we can infer the types and intensities of selection pressures that were most important in shaping toxin diversity.

虽然大多数外行人在识别像水母，黄蜂，蜘蛛和蝎子这样的生物作为潜在危险的有毒生物体方面没有什么问题，但很少有人知道这种情况。3,300种蜈蚣都有剧毒一对强壮的毒液爪位于头部后面，它们拥有大型的毒液腺，含有复杂的毒液成分。不幸的是，我们对蜈蚣毒液的组成几乎一无所知，这不仅在我们对生态学上重要的群体的理解中留下了一个巨大的漏洞，而且还损害了我们对动物王国毒液进化的一般理解。本研究旨在通过对蜈蚣毒液成分的首次广泛而深入的分析来弥补这种无知。该项目将采用遗传学方法，并将描述五种蜈蚣毒液的毒素特征。这五个物种被选为代表所有主要的蜈蚣群。对于每个物种，将表征多达50万个mRNA序列。这些前体分子是产生毒素蛋白的模板。通过比较这些序列在选定物种中的分布，我们可以开始解决与毒液和有毒生物进化有关的重要问题。可以回答的最基本的问题很简单：蜈蚣的毒腺中表达了什么毒素？这个问题的答案将是回答其他问题的基础。蜈蚣的毒液和其他种类的毒液有很多共同的毒素吗？我们已经从以前的研究中知道，不同的有毒动物群体可以将许多类似的毒素吸收到它们的毒液中。它们通过复制一个编码正常身体蛋白质的基因，并在毒腺中表达其中一个拷贝来做到这一点。基因序列的改变可以改变蛋白质，这可以改变蛋白质的功能，使其作为毒素更有效。然而，初步研究表明，蜈蚣毒液可能含有许多毒素，（还没有？）在其他群体中发现。这项研究将使我们看到蜈蚣中有多少毒液成分是它们独有的。新数据可以解决的另一个主要问题是蜈蚣物种的多样化及其毒素是否齐头并进。通过整合毒素基因和蜈蚣的家族树，我们可以推断蜈蚣进化中的特定事件是否也与毒素进化有关。我们还可以通过整合其他有毒和无毒动物的数据来推断蜈蚣中的毒素基因是从哪种基因进化而来的。由于到目前为止还没有蜈蚣的数据，我们可以广泛地重新评估我们目前对所有动物进化中毒素模式的理解。我们也可以利用这些新数据来研究什么样的过程对形成蜈蚣毒液的成分很重要。一个可能很重要的因素是蜈蚣吃不同种类猎物的范围。一个捕食范围广泛的物种可能比一个专门捕食特定猎物的物种具有更大的毒素多样性。通过将毒液成分与它们肠道中被识别的猎物多样性联系起来，我们可以开始回答这个问题。最后，通过观察毒素序列中发生了什么样的变化，以及它们的哪些部分，我们可以推断出选择压力的类型和强度，这些压力对形成毒素多样性最重要。