课题基金 / 基金详情

Supporting ecosystem services on commercial farms: using evidence to inform land management decisions

Supporting ecosystem services on commercial farms: using evidence to inform land management decisions
支持商业农场的生态系统服务:利用证据为土地管理决策提供信息
批准号:
NE/K015419/1
负责人:
Lynn Dicks
金额:
$30.33万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Fellowship
财政年份:
2013
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2013 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

Lynn Dicks的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
This research aims to make recommendations for how to manage commercial farms to support biodiversity and ecosystem services whilst maintaining or increasing yields and profits. Sets of recommendations will be specific to different farm types or landscape types, and will build upon detailed scientific understanding of underlying ecological processes.In the last ten years, scientists have described how ecosystems provide services that are essential for food production, such as clean water, a healthy soil and good climate, pollination and pest control. They are measuring these services and how much they are worth to society, and beginning to understand how important a variety of species and habitats is for providing the services. The big gap is translating all this knowledge into practical advice for commercial farmers. The research takes two approaches. The first approach will develop a sophisticated decision support tool that incorporates a wide range of scientific knowledge, some of it very uncertain, into the cost-sensitive decisions that farm managers have to make about how to manage land. This will compare the effects on biodiversity and ecosystem services of a range of different land management options, including possible crop rotations, interventions to support biodiversity and interventions to increase yield. It will consider the costs (or the available profits) of the alternative options, and produce an optimal strategy that maximises biodiversity and ecosystem value whilst retaining viable profit. When the science is uncertain, the software tool will allow the researcher to find out whether this matters to the ultimate decision or not. For example, if we can't be sure exactly how much pollination of oilseed rape is enhanced by providing nectar and pollen margins, does this make a difference to whether or not farmers should incorporate pollen and nectar margins, given that these margins have a range of other known benefits but involve a loss of yield due to reduced cropping area? Of course, the solutions will be sensitive to the costs built into the model, but these will be developed in partnership with commercial agronomists and will be as realistic as possible.The second approach will develop a package of agri-environment measures to support beneficial insects in a range of different farm types. Beneficial insects provide two ecosystem services - pollination for insect-pollinated crops and some pest control service on all crops. Supporting these services in farmland is complex. Both are delivered by a variety of free-living mobile organisms. The actual insect species involved varies from place to place and from year to year, and the different species need different resources, such as adult food, food for their young, overwintering sites or hunting grounds. The researcher will devise a set of indicator species for delivering these services in orchards, soft fruit farms, arable farms and horticulture. The indicator set will cover all major resource needs and incorporate any specialised reliance on particular resources. For the indicator species set in each farming type, the research will then pool relevant ecological knowledge, including population modelling where available, and expert assessment to produce a set of agri-environment options that provide the appropriate amount and arrangement of resources to support delivery of pollination and pest control from the natural ecosystem.
期刊论文(10)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12536
发表时间: 2015-08
期刊: Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
影响因子: --
作者: [Batáry P, Dicks LV, Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ]
通讯作者: Sutherland WJ
What agricultural practices are most likely to deliver 'sustainable intensification' in the UK?
哪些农业实践最有可能在英国实现“可持续集约化”?
DOI: 10.17863/cam.38138
发表时间: 2019
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: [Dicks L]
通讯作者: Dicks L
DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10055
发表时间: 2019-12-01
期刊: PEOPLE AND NATURE
影响因子: 6.1
作者: [Breeze, Tom D., Boreux, Virginie, Kleijn, David]
通讯作者: Kleijn, David
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2249
发表时间: 2016
期刊: PeerJ
影响因子: 2.7
作者: [Brown MJ, Dicks LV, Paxton RJ, Baldock KC, Barron AB, Chauzat MP, Freitas BM, Goulson D, Jepsen S, Kremen C, Li J, Neumann P, Pattemore DE, Potts SG, Schweiger O, Seymour CL, Stout JC]
通讯作者: Stout JC
GLobal Insect Threat-Response Synthesis (GLiTRS): a comprehensive and predictive assessment of the pattern and consequences of insect declines
  • 批准号:
    NE/V007173/1
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $27.78万
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 负责人:
    Lynn Dicks
  • 依托单位:
Towards 'crop-pollinating' landscapes: quantifying pollen supply and demand to manage wild pollinators for their benefits to food production
  • 批准号:
    NE/N014472/2
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
  • 资助金额:
    $29.91万
  • 财政年份:
    2019
  • 负责人:
    Lynn Dicks
  • 依托单位:
Sustainable Fruit farming In the CAatinga: managing ecosystem service trade-offs as agriculture intensifies (SUFICA)
  • 批准号:
    BB/R016429/1
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $55.82万
  • 财政年份:
    2018
  • 负责人:
    Lynn Dicks
  • 依托单位:
Towards 'crop-pollinating' landscapes: quantifying pollen supply and demand to manage wild pollinators for their benefits to food production
  • 批准号:
    NE/N014472/1
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
  • 资助金额:
    $70.75万
  • 财政年份:
    2016
  • 负责人:
    Lynn Dicks
  • 依托单位:
海外基金