GENETIC TIES AND THE FUTURE OF THE FAMILY

描述：(申请人摘要)：建议的研究是一项综合性的研究 评估非法医行为的伦理、法律和社会影响 身份测试，特别关注对家庭的影响。这个 研究将解决以下问题：1)不同的哲学和伦理学 关于亲子关系和亲子关系的观点；2)观念 与家庭有关的法律的基础；3) 不同的家庭观念和人口统计学和经济学 家庭；4)关于社会形态影响的经验证据 家庭结构对发展和幸福的影响；5)遗传的意义 不同亚文化中的亲子关系和血统；6)身份测试和 媒体；7)现有的法律框架，包括差异很大的领域； 8)家庭法的趋势和发展中的法律是否足以解决 新基因知识的伦理和社会影响；9)广告的使用 关于考试和考试的冲突中的诉讼和替代争议解决 子女的亲子关系；10)身份测试对其他领域的影响 关于家庭关系的后果和潜在的 基因隐私法填补隐私保护空白；11)激励措施 根据现有和可能的法律制度创建；12)适用于 进行身份测试的实验室；13)实验室质量问题；14) 实验室隐私问题；15)将咨询与 测试。研究设计包括哲学、社会科学和 研究和分析的法律方法。互联网搜索和一项关于 实验室将补充传统的以图书馆为基础的研究。在保持 致力于跨学科工作，相关领域的领先专家 菲尔德将在一系列会议上提交论文供讨论和批评 多学科会议。精选的论文将构成学术论文的基础 书。其他成果将包括一套关于立法和 其他形式的监管、专业人员指南、学术文章 期刊和专业出版物，并通过以下途径传播研究结果 大众媒体。所有研究方向都将在一次重要会议上达到顶峰。 在2002年秋天。会议将向公众开放，并有组织地举行 以吸引不同的观众。

DESCRIPTION: (Applicant's Abstract): The proposed research is a comprehensive assessment of the ethical, legal and social implications of non-forensic identity testing, with a special focus on implications for families. The research will address the following: 1) different philosophical and ethical perspectives on parenthood and the parent-child relationship; 2) the conceptual underpinnings of the law relevant to the family; 3) the historical roots of different conceptions of the family and the demographics and economics of the family; 4) empirical evidence concerning the effects of social patterns and family structures on development and well-being; 5) the significance of genetic parentage and lineage in different subcultures; 6) identity testing and the media; 7) existing legal frameworks including areas of significant variation; 8) trends in family law and the adequacy of the developing law to address the ethical and social implications of new genetic knowledge; 9) the use of ad litems and alternative dispute resolution in conflicts about the testing and parentage of children; 10) the implications of identity testing for other areas of law that concern the consequences of family relationship and the potential for genetic privacy laws to fill gaps in privacy protection; 11) incentives created under existing and possible legal regimes; 12) standards governing laboratories performing identity testing; 13) laboratory quality issues; 14) laboratory privacy issues; 15) options for integration of counseling with testing. The research design consists of philosophical, social science, and legal methods of research and analysis. Internet searches and a survey of laboratories would supplement traditional library-based research. In keeping with a commitment to interdisciplinary work, leading experts in the relevant fields would present papers for discussion and critique at a series of multidisciplinary meetings. Selected papers would form the basis of a scholarly book. Other outcomes would include a set of recommendations on legislation and other forms of regulation, guidelines for professionals, articles in scholarly journals and professional publications, and dissemination of findings through the popular media. All lines of research would culminate in a major conference in the fall of 2002. The conference would be open to the public and structured to attract a diverse audience.