权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Trainee-Focusted Training for Research Integrity

以受训者为中心的研究诚信培训

基本信息

批准号：
6665297
负责人：
STEVEN J JACOBSEN
金额：
$ 13.73万
依托单位：
MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER
依托单位国家：
美国
项目类别：
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
美国
起止时间：
2002-09-30 至 2005-08-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/6665297
关键词：
behavioral /social science research tag clinical research data collection methodology /evaluation decision making education evaluation /planning ethics health science research analysis /evaluation human subject training

项目摘要

DESCRIPTION (provided by the applicant): The importance of the highest level of ethical and moral behavior among scientists is so universally accepted that it has become one of the "truths" which govern the scientific discovery process. Historically, young and developing scientists have learned what is expected of them when planning, doing and reporting research through the informal mechanisms inherent in the mentor-based training model of research. As the complexities, opportunities, and size of biomedical research have expanded; however, concern has been raised that trainees are not acquiring the normative behaviors expected. This has led to the establishment of expectations for systematic, formalized training in Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR). While this systematic training is well intended, prior studies have failed to identify meaningful impacts of such training, especially with respect to some of the most important behavioral expectations. At present, it is unclear if failure to see impacts of RCR training is due to training design flaws, ineffective evaluation methodologies, intractability of research trainees, mixed messages they receive between courses and real life in the lab, or fundamental differences in the frames of references between current trainees and established scientists. The proposed research will take a step back from simply evaluating another RCR course to study in depth the frames of references for current trainees and the impacts of an RCR course from those frames of reference. Using focus groups, individual interviews and qualitative research methods, the Aims will be to: 1. Work with faculty in the Mayo Graduate School course on RCR to define objectives and key messages for each topic. 2. Establish the baseline perspectives on RCR for trainees at several levels of training. 3. Determine trainee perceptions of the key messages provided in the RCR course. 4. Specifically probe trainee perspectives before, immediately after, and one year after an RCR course on two key topics- Conflict of Interest and Authorship. 5. Determine if trainees see consistency between messages provided in the course and their labs, and study the impact of inconsistencies on trainee attitudes and projected behavior. 6. Identify high frequency perceptions or frames of reference, which are substantially at odds with accepted research norms and begin designing better interventions to alter them.

描述(由申请人提供)：科学家中最高水平的伦理和道德行为的重要性被如此普遍地接受，以至于它已经成为支配科学发现过程的“真理”之一。从历史上看，年轻和发展中的科学家通过以导师为基础的研究培训模式固有的非正式机制，在规划、进行和报告研究时了解到对他们的期望。随着生物医学研究的复杂性、机会和规模的扩大；然而，人们担心受训者没有获得预期的规范行为。这导致了对负责任的研究行为(RCR)的系统、正式培训的期望。虽然这种系统训练的目的是好的，但先前的研究未能确定这种训练的有意义的影响，特别是关于一些最重要的行为期望。目前尚不清楚，未能看到RCR培训的影响是由于培训设计缺陷、评估方法无效、研究受训人员难以驾驭、他们在课程和实验室实际生活之间收到的信息混淆，还是由于当前受训人员和知名科学家之间的参考框架存在根本差异。拟议的研究将从简单地评估另一个RCR课程倒退到深入研究当前受训人员的参考框架以及从这些参考框架中RCR课程的影响。利用焦点小组、个人访谈和定性研究方法，目标是：1.与梅奥研究生院课程的教职员工合作，确定每个主题的目标和关键信息。2.为几个培训级别的受训者建立关于RCR的基线观点。3.确定学员对RCR课程中提供的关键信息的看法。4.具体探讨学员在RCR课程之前、之后和一年后对两个关键主题--利益冲突和作者身份--的看法。5.确定学员是否认为课程中提供的信息与他们的实验室信息一致，并研究不一致对学员态度和预期行为的影响。6.找出与公认的研究规范大相径庭的高频感知或参照系，并开始设计更好的干预措施来改变它们。