Community-based Life Cycle Building Analysis: Tools to Support Democratic Estate Regeneration

一个用于评估房地产再生计划的扩展性生命周期可持续性分析框架：伦敦房地产案例研究摘要-近年来，在房地产再生的背景下，人们越来越关注再生计划对环境的影响。生命周期评价（LCA）是用于评估方案环境影响的方法。开展生命周期评估的方法和实际局限性可能导致研究结果的对比。此外，为了实现可持续增长，对再生计划的评估和分析应考虑其社会经济和环境影响。包括三个可持续发展支柱的方法被称为生命周期可持续性评估。为了在备选方案评估中反映出一系列利益攸关方的优先事项，不同的利益攸关方应参与决策分析的不同阶段。本研究旨在回答这样一个问题：“如何将参与式方法整合到建筑生命周期可持续性的评估和分析中，从而影响伦敦房地产更新方案的评估？”".为此，本研究将采用演绎和归纳的方法对复杂的混合方法设计，交叉的核心设计在不同的方法和理论框架的LCSA的评估和分析，并为确定的框架的评价。该研究将试图确定：一个框架，进行共识参与LCSA的房地产再生计划;一个框架，分析多方利益相关者的LCSA的房地产再生计划;一个模型，用于评估崇高的理论和实践框架确定的评估伦敦房地产再生计划。复杂的混合方法研究设计包括一个试点研究和一个案例研究项目。为经验性的混合方法设计收集数据是通过调查、访谈、焦点小组和与方案的主要利益攸关方共同设计讲习班。预计这些合作框架将有助于为评估、分析和评价拟议方法制定一个共识框架。该研究旨在将其研究结果应用于英国房地产再生的决策。

A Participatory Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis framework for the Appraisal of Estates' Regeneration Schemes: Case Study of a London EstateAbstract - Within the context of the regeneration of housing estates in recent years, there has been an increase in focusing on environmental impacts of the regeneration schemes. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is the methodology used to evaluate the environmental impacts of the schemes. The methodological and practical limitations of undertaking LCA can result in contrasting outcomes of the studies. In addition, to enable sustainable growth the assessment and analysis of the regeneration schemes should consider their socio-economic as well as their environmental impacts. The methodology which includes the three sustainable development pillars is called Life Cycle sustainability Assessment (LCSA). In order to reflect the priorities of an array of stakeholders in options' appraisal, different stakeholders should be engaged in different stages of decision analysis. This research study aims to answer the question "How can integrating a participatory approach to assessment and analysis of buildings' lifecycle sustainability impact the appraisal of London estates' regeneration schemes?". To do so, this study will be employing deductive and inductive approaches on a complex mixed methods design, intersecting the core designs within different methodologies and theoretical frameworks for the assessment and analysis of LCSA, and for the evaluation of the identified frameworks. The study will attempt to identify: a framework for conducting a consensus participatory LCSA for estates' regeneration schemes; a framework for the analysis of multi-stakeholder LCSA for estates' regeneration schemes; a model for evaluating the noble theoretical and practical frameworks identified for the appraisal of London estates' regeneration schemes. The complex mixed methods research design consists of a pilot study and a case study project. Data collection for the empirical intersected mixed methods design is through surveys, interviews, focus groups, and co-design workshops with key stakeholders of the schemes. The collaborative frameworks are expected to assist in developing a consensus framework for the assessment, analysis, and evaluation of the proposed methodology. The study aims to apply its findings to be implemented for decision-making over the regeneration of housing estates in the UK.