Do these violent delights have violent ends? Deconstructing rough sex portrayals in media, feminist theory and policy

这些暴力的快乐会带来暴力的结局吗？

• 批准号: 2725265
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF EXETER
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2022 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2725265
• 关键词: Do; these; violent; delights; ends

Within the last decade, rough sex has catapulted to the centre of public discourse, especially in the media. Perhaps in part a response to the popularity of Fifty Shades of Grey and its cinematic adaptations, rough sex - physical aggression during sex including behaviours such as hair-pulling, biting, spanking, choking and being tied up - has become a prominent focus of cultural and lifestyle online publications. Indeed, online magazines like Cosmopolitan and Men's Health regularly cover rough sex and related behaviours, treating it as a common and normal part of individuals' sex lives and sexual desires. Yet a counter-narrative that rough sex is a product of criminal and patriarchal wrongdoing is fighting back within news and current affairs, sometimes even within the same publications. Space is frequently afforded to the demands of campaigns like We Can't Consent to This (WCCTT) which seeks to ban what they see as 'the rough sex defence'. This defence is purportedly used when male defendants seek to reduce or dismiss a murder or grievous bodily harm charge by claiming that their victims died accidentally in "a sex game gone wrong" or that they consented to sexually-acquired injuries.Two competing narratives about rough sex, then, exist in the newspaper and magazine media: on one hand it is portrayed as harmful and immoral acts done to women as a patriarchal abuse, while on the other the often-positive response to entertainment and culture portrays rough sex as a sexually liberating practice for women that ought to be destigmatised. It is suggested that such competing narratives follows closely the 'sex wars' of scholarly feminism of the 1970s onwards both in its portrayal of the effects and the public, moral and legal legitimacy of such acts.The research is concerned with the legal and political theories and principles underpinning our rules and laws on gendered agency, and where the state has a right or duty to protect itself or its citizens from harm rather than support individuals' own choices. Online newspapers and magazines will be identified using YouGov's public rankings of popular UK publications and websites. The results will be recorded in Microsoft Excel and filtered based on the category listed online (i.e. 'news', 'entertainment', 'lifestyle' etc.). These materials will then be coded using an inductive approach to thematic analysis.

在过去的十年中，粗暴的性行为跃升为公众话语的中心，尤其是在媒体上。也许部分回应了五十种灰色阴影及其电影改编，粗暴的性行为 - 性侵略在性行为中，包括诸如脱毛，咬人，打屁股，窒息和被绑住等行为的身体侵略 - 已成为文化和生活方式在线出版物的杰出焦点。的确，像国际大都会和男性健康等在线杂志定期涵盖了粗糙的性行为和相关行为，将其视为个人性生活和性欲的常见和正常部分。然而，反叙事是粗暴性是犯罪和父权制不法行为的产物，正在新闻和时事中反击，有时甚至在同一出版物中。经常满足我们不能同意这一点（WCCTT）的竞选活动的要求，该运动试图禁止他们认为“粗糙的性防御”。据称，当男性被告寻求减少或驳回严重的身体伤害指控时，这种辩护是通过声称自己的受害者意外死亡的“性爱游戏”，或者他们同意对性受到性遭受性损害的伤害而偶然死亡的情况，这是在报纸和杂志媒体上存在于妇女身上的，这是在某种程度上遭到伤害的，这是徒劳的，这是徒劳的。对娱乐和文化的反应通常是阳性的反应，将粗暴的性爱描绘成对应该被毁灭的女性的性解放实践。有人建议，这种竞争叙事紧密遵循1970年代学术女权主义的“性战争”，这在其效果的描绘中以及这种行为的公众，道德和法律合法性的描述都与我们的法律和政治理论和原则有关，与国家的规则和法律相比，与个人的范围相比，对自己的规则和法律进行了保护，以及对个人的控制或公民对自己的措施的影响，而不是对自己的公民进行保护。在线报纸和杂志将使用YouGov在英国流行的出版物和网站上的公共排名来确定。结果将记录在Microsoft Excel中，并根据在线列出的类别（即“新闻”，“娱乐”，“生活方式”等）进行过滤。然后，这些材料将使用诱导方法进行主题分析进行编码。