权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Brunelleschi Lacan Le Corbusier: the architecture of the self

布鲁内莱斯基·拉康·勒·柯布西耶：自我的建筑

基本信息

批准号：
AH/E004938/1
负责人：
Lorens Holm
金额：
$ 3.84万
依托单位：
University of Dundee
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2007
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2007 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FE004938%2F1
关键词：
Brunelleschi Lacan Le Corbusier architecture

项目摘要

Description: 'BRUNELLESCHI LE CORBUSIER LACAN: the architecture of the self' will be a book length monograph, under firm contract for publication with Routledge in 2008. It argues that perspective is the paradigmatic form of spatial consciousness. This explains why perspective remains such a satisfying representational form - the form of space that we tend to call real - and why it remains the primary visual form of architectural space, despite recent experiments in representation that claim to challenge this canon. The argument begins with the observation that the diagram that the psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan publishes of the structure of the psychoanalytic subject in what he calls the visual field (Paris, 1964) is similar to the diagram that could be drawn of Brunelleschi's demonstration of perspective (Florence, 1420). This link between the 20th Century structuralist discourse of the subject of perception and the classical historical account of the invention of space as we know it, has not hitherto been elaborated, let alone noticed, in the literature of either discourse. In the demonstration, Brunelleschi viewed a hallowed object, the Florence Baptistery; and this act of viewing involved a specific kind of framing and screening by his mirror apparatus. The text explains the similarity between the inner world of the psyche and the outer world of space, by proposing a psychoanalytic interpretation of Brunelleschi's demonstration, as opposed to the standard - and it is argued, deeply flawed - historiographic reconstructions (White, Gombrich, Krautheimer, Edgerton, Panofsky); in turn, it uses the architectural discourse of space to elaborate the key Lacanian and Freudian accounts of the subject of perception. It also proposes a new way to approach a problem that is one of the bugbears of modernism: modernism's relation to its past. Context: The use of psychoanalytic theory as an interpretive approach to problems of architecture and perception is an active and developing area of interdisciplinary research. My work references and extends prior research by, e.g., Tony Vidler, Beatriz Colomina, Hubert Damisch, Steven Pile. It will be a major contribution to this field.Aims and objectives: The object of this interdisciplinary research project is to complete a 100,000 word monograph, the aim of which is to revise our understanding of architectural space and the spatiality of the psyche. It aims to draw strong conceptual links between key aspects of psychoanalytic theory that relate to space (dreams, drive, identity, and desire), and key aspects of the architectural discourse of space, in particular, the invention of perspective. The argument, which has been mapped out and is in the process of being fully developed in written form, is based on the close analytic reading of key texts in architecture and psychoanalytic theory. Applications and benefits: This research critiques the historical account of the invention of perspective - the foundational moment in the architectural discourse of space - and reinterprets it in ways relevant for today. It will open up new areas of research questions in this inter-disciplinary field. It will lead to a new understanding of our relation to architectural space and objects that will benefit designers and theorists of architecture; it will be of interest to psychoanalysts interested in how their work has bearing on fields outside their own. This research will be disseminated by publication of a monograph that promises to be a significant contribution to architectural theory. Material from this research will also be disseminated by several planned 'satellite' journal papers.

产品描述：《布鲁内莱斯基·勒·科布西耶·拉康：自我的建筑》将是一本书长的专著，根据与《建筑师》的公司合同，将于2008年出版。本文认为视角是空间意识的范式形式。这就解释了为什么透视仍然是一种令人满意的表现形式--我们倾向于称之为真实的空间形式--以及为什么它仍然是建筑空间的主要视觉形式，尽管最近的表现实验声称要挑战这一准则。这场争论始于这样一种观察：精神分析学家雅克·拉康（Jacques Lacan）发表的关于精神分析主体在他所谓的视野中的结构的图表（巴黎，1964），与布鲁内莱斯基（Brunelleschi）的透视论证（佛罗伦萨，1420）的图表相似。世纪结构主义关于知觉主体的论述与我们所知的关于空间发明的经典历史叙述之间的这种联系，迄今为止在这两种论述的文献中都没有得到阐述，更不用说注意到了。在演示中，布鲁内莱斯基观看了一个神圣的物体，佛罗伦萨洗礼堂;这种观看行为涉及到他的镜子装置的一种特殊的框架和屏蔽。文本解释了心灵的内部世界和空间的外部世界之间的相似性，通过提出一个布鲁内莱斯基的示范精神分析的解释，而不是标准的-它认为，严重缺陷-史学重建（白色、贡布里希、克劳塞默、埃杰顿、帕诺夫斯基）;反过来，它使用建筑的空间话语来阐述拉康和弗洛伊德对感知主体的关键描述。它还提出了一种新的方法来解决一个问题，这是现代主义的困扰之一：现代主义与其过去的关系。内容：使用精神分析理论作为建筑和感知问题的解释方法是跨学科研究的一个活跃和发展领域。我的工作参考并扩展了以前的研究，例如，托尼·维德勒，比阿特丽斯·科洛米纳，休伯特·达米施，史蒂文·派尔。目的和目标：本跨学科研究项目的目标是完成一本10万字的专著，其目的是修正我们对建筑空间和心灵空间性的理解。它的目的是在与空间有关的精神分析理论的关键方面（梦想，驱动力，身份和欲望）与空间建筑话语的关键方面之间建立强有力的概念联系，特别是透视的发明。这一论点，已经制定出来，并在充分发展的书面形式的过程中，是基于密切分析阅读的关键文本在建筑和精神分析理论。应用和优势：本研究批判了透视发明的历史记录--空间建筑话语的基础性时刻--并以与今天相关的方式重新解释它。它将在这一跨学科领域开辟研究问题的新领域。它将导致我们对建筑空间和物体的关系的新理解，这将使建筑设计师和理论家受益;它将使精神分析学家感兴趣，他们的工作如何影响他们自己之外的领域。这项研究将通过出版一本专著来传播，这本专著有望对建筑理论做出重大贡献。这项研究的材料也将通过几个计划中的“卫星”期刊论文传播。