权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Conflict resolution in mutualisms.

互利共生中的冲突解决。

基本信息

批准号：
NE/C511264/2
负责人：
James Cook
金额：
$ 9.04万
依托单位：
University of Reading
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2007
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2007 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=NE%2FC511264%2F2
关键词：
Conflict resolution mutualisms.

项目摘要

Many organisms are involved in intimate associations with other species. In general the smaller partner (symbiont) lives partly in or on the larger partner (host). Symbioses can be beneficial to both partners, in which case they are called mutualisms, or can involve one partner (the parasite) inflicting harm on the other (host). Even when both partners appear to gain from the association, they do not always have the same evolutionary interests. There is no hard and fast border between parasitism and mutualism and it is important to understand what factors favour positive or negative effects of the symbiont on the host. This is especially so if the symbiont is only parasitic under certain circumstances, as in many microbial infections of animals. More generally, mutualism is of immense importance in biology, both in the short and long term. For example, their association with rhizobial bacteria allows bean plants access to nitrogen. Mutualism can also lead to major evolutionary events and the two major genetic components of our cells (nucleus and mitochondria) had their origins in an ancient mutualism. Despite the importance of mutualism, there is no general theory that explains when we should expect a mutualistic outcome, or how the mutualists resolve their conflicts. However, there is increasing evidence that hosts can limit the parasitic tendencies of symbionts by controlling their access to key host resources and also influencing the way in which different individual symbionts have to compete with each other for access to host resources. This type of explanation could be applicable in a wide variety of cases including plants and pollinators, plants and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and even some human diseases. This project will investigate how hosts control their symbionts using a model system involving fig trees and their pollinating wasps. This is a mutualistic interaction, but one with clear conflicts. Specifically, while figs need wasps to pollinate their flowers, the wasp larvae eat some of the fig seeds. The fig needs to manage the wasps so that they do not lay eggs in all the seeds. Figs may manage wasps by altering the quality and architecture of the fig flowers so that some are more desirable sites for wasp to lay eggs. This may be because some flowers are better places for wasp larvae to develop, or because some flowers are easier for wasps to lay eggs into, or both. In theory, the wasps' preference for certain flowers, plus the fact that they waste time rejecting flowers that they deem unsuitable, or flowers in which other wasps have laid eggs (only one egg can develop per flower), can prevent the wasps from exploiting too many of the seeds and allow the mutualism to persist. We will test this idea by making detailed studies of five pairs of figs and their pollinators, choosing the species to reflect the great differences in biology seen across the over 750 species of figs in the world. We will video and analyse the flower searching and egg-laying behaviour of wasps and also assess whether certain flowers give rise to better (bigger) wasp offspring. We will use the data to test the theoretical model for each species. We will also estimate just how much conflict there is between the fig and wasp partners in each case, by measuring the average number of wasps entering a fig, the average number of eggs per wasp, and the average number of flowers that these eggs could potentially exploit. In addition, we will investigate whether some fig species use extra mechanisms (such as rapid flower wilting) beyond those mentioned above to stop wasps laying too many eggs. Overall, the project will be a detailed investigation of how diverse fig species stop their pollinators from destroying all their seeds (thus allowing the mutualism to persist), using a new approach that should help us to understand not only these, but perhaps most mutualisms.

许多生物与其他物种有着密切的联系。一般来说，较小的伙伴（共生体）部分地生活在较大的伙伴（宿主）中或其上。共生可以对双方都有利，在这种情况下，它们被称为互惠，或者可以涉及一个伙伴（寄生虫）对另一个（宿主）造成伤害。即使双方似乎都从这种联系中获益，他们也不总是有相同的进化利益。在寄生和互利共生之间没有严格的界限，重要的是要了解哪些因素有利于共生体对宿主产生积极或消极的影响。如果共生体仅在某些情况下是寄生的，就像许多动物的微生物感染一样，情况尤其如此。更一般地说，互利共生在生物学中具有巨大的重要性，无论是在短期还是长期。例如，它们与根瘤菌的结合使豆类植物能够获得氮。互利共生也可以导致重大的进化事件，我们细胞的两个主要遗传成分（细胞核和线粒体）起源于古老的互利共生。尽管互利主义很重要，但没有一个普遍的理论来解释我们何时应该期待互利主义的结果，或者互利主义者如何解决他们的冲突。然而，越来越多的证据表明，主机可以限制共生体的寄生倾向，通过控制它们对关键主机资源的访问，并影响不同的个体共生体必须相互竞争以获得主机资源的方式。这种类型的解释可以适用于各种各样的情况，包括植物和传粉者，植物和固氮细菌，甚至一些人类疾病。本计画将以无花果树及其传粉蜂为模型，探讨寄主如何控制其共生体。这是一种互利的互动，但也有明显的冲突。具体来说，虽然无花果需要黄蜂来授粉，但黄蜂幼虫会吃掉一些无花果种子。无花果需要管理黄蜂，使它们不会在所有的种子中产卵。无花果可以通过改变无花果花的质量和结构来控制黄蜂，这样一些花就更适合黄蜂产卵。这可能是因为有些花更适合黄蜂幼虫发育，或者因为有些花更容易让黄蜂产卵，或者两者兼而有之。理论上，黄蜂对某些花的偏好，加上它们浪费时间拒绝它们认为不合适的花，或者其他黄蜂产卵的花（每朵花只能发育一个卵），可以防止黄蜂利用太多的种子，并允许互利共生持续下去。我们将通过对五对无花果及其传粉者的详细研究来验证这一想法，选择物种以反映世界上750多种无花果的生物学差异。我们将拍摄和分析黄蜂的寻花和产卵行为，并评估某些花朵是否会产生更好（更大）的黄蜂后代。我们将使用这些数据来测试每个物种的理论模型。我们还将通过测量进入无花果的黄蜂的平均数量、每只黄蜂的平均卵数以及这些卵可能利用的平均花朵数量，来估计每种情况下无花果和黄蜂伴侣之间的冲突程度。此外，我们将调查一些无花果物种是否使用上述机制之外的额外机制（如快速花朵枯萎）来阻止黄蜂产卵过多。总的来说，该项目将详细调查不同的无花果物种如何阻止授粉者破坏它们所有的种子（从而使互利共生得以持续），使用一种新的方法，不仅可以帮助我们理解这些，而且可能是大多数互利共生。

项目成果

期刊论文数量（7）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

A role for parasites in stabilising the fig-pollinator mutualism.

寄生虫在稳定无花果 - 授粉互助中的作用。

DOI：
10.1371/journal.pbio.0060059
发表时间：
2008-03-11
期刊：
PLOS BIOLOGY
影响因子：
9.8
作者：
Dunn, Derek W.;Segar, Simon T.;Ridley, Jo;Chan, Ruth;Crozier, Ross H.;Yu, Douglas W.;Cook, James M.
通讯作者：
Cook, James M.

Convergent structure of multitrophic communities over three continents.