权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Behavioral Economics: Evaluation of a Rewards Program for Preventive Care

行为经济学：预防保健奖励计划的评估

基本信息

批准号：
8180751
负责人：
ROLAND STURM
金额：
$ 22.35万
依托单位：
RAND CORPORATION
依托单位国家：
美国
项目类别：
财政年份：
2011
资助国家：
美国
起止时间：
2011-09-27 至 2013-08-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8180751
关键词：
Accounting Address Advisory Committees Attention Behavioral Binding Caring Cellular Phone Characteristics China Clothing Complement Complex Control Groups Costs and Benefits Data Data Sources Decision Making Decision Modeling Dimensions Economics Evaluation Future Gifts Happiness Health Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Services Research Health Surveys Healthcare Household Incentives Individual Industry Insurance Carriers International Joints Laboratory Study Literature Modeling Outcome Outpatients Participant Patients Population Prevention Preventive Preventive Health Services Price Recommendation Rewards Sampling Selection Bias Services South Africa Travel Uncertainty United States base behavior change cost cost effective design discount economic evaluation experience field study improved innovation insight member programs research study theories

项目摘要

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The Affordable Care Act increased coverage for preventive health services, but research has shown that removing out-of-pocket costs will only have a limited impact on the discrepancy between recommended and actual use. Patient incentives have been promoted as a mechanism to increase receipt of preventive care. The field of behavioral economics demonstrates that individuals' decision making routinely and in predictable ways deviates from assumptions underlying neoclassical economics. Making good decisions becomes particularly hard when choices are complex, involve uncertainty, or involve tradeoffs between current and future costs/ benefits. These are central features of preventive care and contribute to why individuals are less likely to obtain preventive care than (similarly effective) curative services. Incentive programs that incorporate insights from behavioral economics may be more successful, although experience with them is limited. An unusually innovative preventive care incentive program that incorporates many of the lessons of behavioral economics has been pioneered by Discovery, a health insurance company operating in South Africa, the United States, the UK, and China. In their program, the receipt of preventive care services "earns" points and the points can then be used for gifts such as discounted travel and retail items. These types of incentive programs have significant potential to improve preventive care, but there have been no empirical evaluations of their impact. Our proposed project will analyze whether these design features increase the use of preventive services and evaluate whether this could be a cost-effective approach for a health insurer. We will focus our analysis upon recommendations made by the U.S. Preventive Task Force. Our primary statistical approach is a difference-in- difference analysis (pre/post of individuals becoming eligible for new benefits with control groups, i.e. individual only having health insurance, but not participating in the reward program). PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: This project will evaluate a program that addresses a key issue in health care reform: How can we increase use of preventive services in a cost-effective way? Discovery, an international health insurance company, developed a reward program in which members earn points for preventive services that can be exchanged for a variety of goods and services from retailers. Similar types of reward/loyalty program have been used in other industries (starting with airlines), who found it a more cost-effective way to change customer behavior than changing prices. By studying changes in utilization of preventive services and health outcomes among this program's members and a control group, we will be able to provide the empirical results on what a program based on recent ideas from behavioral economics could achieve in a large population.

描述(由申请人提供)：《平价医疗法案》扩大了预防性医疗服务的覆盖范围，但研究表明，取消自付费用对建议使用和实际使用之间的差异影响有限。作为增加接受预防性护理的一种机制，促进了对患者的激励。行为经济学领域表明，个人的决策通常以可预测的方式偏离了新古典主义经济学的假设。当选择很复杂，涉及不确定性，或涉及当前和未来的成本/收益之间的权衡时，做出好的决定变得特别困难。这些是预防保健的中心特征，也是为什么个人获得预防性保健的可能性低于(同样有效的)治疗服务的原因。纳入行为经济学见解的激励计划可能会更成功，尽管经验有限。在南非、美国、英国和中国开展业务的健康保险公司Discovery率先推出了一项异常创新的预防保健激励计划，该计划融合了行为经济学的许多教训。在他们的计划中，接受预防护理服务的人会获得积分，然后这些积分可以用来购买打折的旅行和零售物品等礼物。这些类型的激励计划具有改善预防保健的巨大潜力，但尚未对其影响进行实证评估。我们提议的项目将分析这些设计特征是否增加了预防性服务的使用，并评估这是否可能是一种对健康保险公司来说具有成本效益的方法。我们将重点分析美国预防工作组提出的建议。我们的主要统计方法是差异分析(与对照组相比，个人有资格获得新福利的前后情况，即个人只有医疗保险，但不参加奖励计划)。公共卫生相关性：该项目将评估一项解决医疗改革中一个关键问题的计划：我们如何以具有成本效益的方式增加预防性服务的使用？国际健康保险公司Discovery开发了一项奖励计划，会员可以通过预防服务获得积分，这些服务可以换取零售商提供的各种商品和服务。类似类型的奖励/忠诚度计划也被用于其他行业(从航空公司开始)，他们发现这是一种比改变价格更具成本效益的方式来改变客户行为。通过研究该项目成员和对照组在预防服务利用和健康结果方面的变化，我们将能够提供基于行为经济学最新理念的项目在大范围人群中所能实现的实证结果。