CHOICE: Coalition of Hospices Organized to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness
CHOICE:组织临终关怀联盟调查比较有效性
基本信息
- 批准号:8427701
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 16.14万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:
- 财政年份:2012
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2012-09-30 至 2014-09-29
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:
项目摘要
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): In the U.S. today, more than 5,000 hospices provide care for more than 1.5 million patients every year. These patients receive care in their own homes, in nursing homes, in hospitals, and in dedicated hospice units. In order to provide high quality care that is competent, patient- and family- centered, coordinated, and compassionate, hospices need an evidence base of comparative effectiveness research (CER). However, it is unlikely that CER data will come primarily from randomized controlled trials. These trials are very difficult in the hospice setting because the majority of hospice patients are unable to participate. Moreover, patients enroll in hospice very late in the course of illness, making clinicl trials very difficult.
Therefore, in order to advance the science of CER for hospice care in other ways, the research team has developed an innovative CER hospice network (CHOICE: Coalition of Hospices Organized to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness). The overarching goal of the proposed project to investigate the feasibility and validity of EHR-derived hospice data, and to establish the value of the CHOICE network in answering key hospice-focused CER questions.
PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: In the U.S. today, more than 5,000 hospices provide care for more than 1.5 million patients every year. In order to provide high quality care that is competent,
patient- and family-centered, coordinated, and compassionate, hospices need an evidence base of comparative effectiveness research (CER). The goal of this project is to demonstrate the feasibility of using an electronic health record-based network (CHOICE: Coalition of Hospices Organized to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness) to advance the evidence base of hospice care.
描述(由申请人提供):今天,在美国,每年有5,000多个临终关怀机构为150多万患者提供护理。这些病人在自己家里、疗养院、医院和专门的临终关怀单位接受护理。为了提供高质量的护理,是称职的,病人和家庭为中心,协调,和同情,临终关怀需要一个证据基础的比较有效性研究(CER)。然而,CER数据不太可能主要来自随机对照试验。这些试验在临终关怀环境中非常困难,因为大多数临终关怀患者无法参与。此外,患者在疾病过程中很晚才登记临终关怀,使得临床试验非常困难。
因此,为了以其他方式推进CER临终关怀的科学,研究小组开发了一个创新的CER临终关怀网络(CHOICE:组织调查比较有效性的临终关怀联盟)。该项目的总体目标是调查EHR衍生的临终关怀数据的可行性和有效性,并建立CHOICE网络在回答关键的临终关怀CER问题中的价值。
公共卫生相关性:在今天的美国,每年有5,000多家临终关怀机构为150多万患者提供护理。为了提供合格的高质量护理,
以病人和家庭为中心,协调和富有同情心,临终关怀需要一个比较有效性研究(CER)的证据基础。该项目的目标是证明使用基于电子健康记录的网络(选择:临终关怀联盟组织调查比较有效性)的可行性,以推进临终关怀的证据基础。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
DAVID J CASARETT其他文献
DAVID J CASARETT的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('DAVID J CASARETT', 18)}}的其他基金
CHOICE: Coalition of Hospices Organized to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness
CHOICE:组织临终关怀联盟调查比较有效性
- 批准号:
8541805 - 财政年份:2012
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
Patients' and families' home care service priorities
患者和家属的家庭护理服务优先事项
- 批准号:
7250234 - 财政年份:2005
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
Patients' and families' home care service priorities
患者和家属的家庭护理服务优先事项
- 批准号:
7098905 - 财政年份:2005
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
Patients' and families' home care service priorities
患者和家属的家庭护理服务优先事项
- 批准号:
6918391 - 财政年份:2005
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
相似海外基金
SCC-CIVIC-FA Track B:Placekeeping: a Co-designed Model for Intergenerational Co-housing and Coalition Building in a University-Adjacent Community
SCC-CIVIC-FA 轨道 B:场所保留:大学相邻社区中代际共同住房和联盟建设的共同设计模型
- 批准号:
2322329 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Conference: GRANTED DCL: Arizona Regional Coalition of Leaders in Advanced Research Administration (CLARA)
会议:授予 DCL:亚利桑那州高级研究管理领导者地区联盟 (CLARA)
- 批准号:
2324589 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Feasibility of Network Interventions to Facilitate Community Coalition Adoption of Evidence-Based Strategies for Child Obesity Prevention
网络干预促进社区联盟采用循证儿童肥胖预防策略的可行性
- 批准号:
10738463 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
EAGER: Demonstration of Scaling Impact on Coalition Formation in Agent-based Simulation
EAGER:在基于代理的模拟中展示对联盟形成的规模影响
- 批准号:
2333570 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Pivots: Coalition Responsible for Equitable Skills Training
支点:负责公平技能培训的联盟
- 批准号:
2322341 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
Cooperative Agreement
Knowledge Networks: A Transnational Approach to Allied Coalition Dynamics in the Great War
知识网络:一战中盟军联盟动力的跨国方法
- 批准号:
2871665 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
Studentship
Planning: CIVIC-PG Track B: Placekeeping: a Co-designed Model for Intergenerational Co-housing and Coalition Building in a University-Adjacent Community
规划:CIVIC-PG 轨道 B:场所保留:大学相邻社区中代际共同住房和联盟建设的共同设计模型
- 批准号:
2228709 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
The Better Work Better Care Coalition - Establishing and Coordinating a Canadian Research Agenda to Measure and Manage Healthcare Worker Workload in Healthcare Systems
更好的工作更好的护理联盟 - 建立和协调加拿大研究议程,以衡量和管理医疗保健系统中的医护人员工作量
- 批准号:
461014 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
Miscellaneous Programs
A new analysis for coalition formation and payoff distributions by a hybrid model of cooperative and non-cooperative games
合作与非合作博弈混合模型对联盟形成和收益分配的新分析
- 批准号:
22H00829 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 16.14万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)