Functional analysis of beta-TRCP in cell cycle control and DNA damage response

β-TRCP 在细胞周期控制和 DNA 损伤反应中的功能分析

• 批准号: 8607190
• 负责人: Wenyi Wei
• 金额: $ 32.84万
• 依托单位: BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2012
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2012-05-01 至 2016-01-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8607190
• 关键词: Agonist; Antineoplastic Agents; Biochemical; CSNK1A1 gene; Cell Cycle; Cell Cycle Progression; Cell Cycle Regulation; Cells; Chromosomes; Complex; Cullin 1; Cyclin A; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; DNA Replication Damage; DNA damage checkpoint; Data; Development; Ensure; Enzymes; F Box Domain; F-Box Proteins; Feedback; G1 Phase; G1/S Transition; G2 Phase; Genetic; Genomic Instability; Goals; Human; Investigation; Laboratories; Light; Malignant Neoplasms; Mediating; Molecular; Oncogenic; Pathway interactions; Phase; Phosphorylation; Physiological; Play; Property; Regulation; Reporting; Repression; Research; Role; S Phase; Signal Pathway; Signal Transduction; Stress; System; Tumor Suppressor Proteins; Ubiquitin; Ubiquitination; Work; anaphase-promoting complex; casein kinase I; inhibitor/antagonist; innovation; insight; novel; overexpression; prevent; research study; response; tumor; tumorigenesis; ubiquitin-protein ligase

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Aberrant regulation of cell cycle progression results in genomic instability that ultimately leads to cancer development. Proper cell cycle transitions are driven by coordinated waves of ubiquitin-dependent degradation of key cell cycle regulators by APC and SCF, the two major E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes. However, the critical mechanisms mediating ordered SCF and APC activities have not yet been identified. Previously we demonstrated that the APC/Cdh1 complex ubiquitinates and thus targets the SCF component Skp2 for degradation, hence gaining important insight as to why SCF and APC activities are mutually exclusive. More recently, we accumulated evidence suggesting that the F-box protein ?-TRCP can target Cdh1 for degradation, thereby creating a negative feedback loop to repress APC activity. This finding extends our understanding of the underlying mechanisms that tightly orchestrate the activity of the SCF and APC complexes. In Specific Aim #1, we will utilize both genetic and biochemical approaches to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms through which ?-TRCP controls Cdh1 abundance and activity. We will further define how sequential phosphorylation of Cdh1 by Cyclin A/Cdk2 and Plk1 triggers the interaction with, and subsequent ubiquitination, by ?-TRCP. The proposed studies are expected to reveal the important function of ?-TRCP in governing S phase entry via timely destruction of Cdh1. Recent studies indicate that beside its cell cycle regulatory function, ?-TRCP has also emerged as a critical player in S and G2 DNA damage response checkpoints, mainly through destruction of its downstream targets Cdc25A and Claspin. However, further investigation will be necessary to fully understand the function of ?-TRCP in DNA damage response, especially in the regulation of the G1 damage response checkpoint, primarily regulated by the p53 pathway. Mdm2 is the major negative regulator of p53 and frequently overexpressed in tumors, yet the underlying mechanisms are unclear. We recently reported that SCF?-TRCP is a novel E3 ubiquitin ligase targeting Mdm2 for ubiquitination and destruction in a CK1?-dependent manner. But it remains largely unknown how CK1? is activated following DNA damage to govern the Mdm2/p53 pathway. In Specific Aim #2, we intend to continue this innovative research by using multi-disciplinary approaches to investigate how ATM modulates Mdm2 stability by regulating CK1? activity and cellular localization. We will also examine whether Mdm2 is the primary physiological signaling pathway by which ?-TRCP regulates the p53 pathway to govern the DNA damage response, and whether non-degradable Mdm2 (¿p1-23A) displays elevated oncogenic activities. Moreover, we will explore whether clinically, disruption of the components of Mdm2 destruction pathways (?-TRCP/ATM/CK1?) facilitates tumorigenesis, which may be responsible for Mdm2 accumulation often seen in tumors. Our proposed studies will provide new insight into the signaling pathways controlling Mdm2 destruction. It also provides the rationale for developing CKI and ATM agonists as anti-cancer agents.

描述（由申请人提供）：细胞周期进程的异常调节导致基因组不稳定，最终导致癌症的发展。适当的细胞周期转变是由两种主要的E3泛素连接酶复合物APC和SCF对关键细胞周期调节因子的泛素依赖性降解的协调波驱动的。然而，介导有序SCF和APC活性的关键机制尚未确定。之前，我们证明了APC/Cdh1复合物泛素化，从而靶向SCF成分Skp2进行降解，从而获得了关于SCF和APC活性相互排斥的重要见解。最近，我们积累的证据表明F-box蛋白？-TRCP可靶向Cdh1降解，从而形成负反馈循环抑制APC活性。这一发现扩展了我们对紧密协调SCF和APC复合物活性的潜在机制的理解。在具体目标#1中，我们将利用遗传和生化方法来探索潜在的分子机制。-TRCP控制Cdh1的丰度和活性。我们将进一步定义Cyclin A/Cdk2和Plk1对Cdh1的顺序磷酸化如何触发与？-TRCP的相互作用以及随后的泛素化。拟议的研究有望揭示？-TRCP通过及时破坏Cdh1控制S相进入。最近的研究表明，除了它的细胞周期调节功能外，？-TRCP也成为S和G2 DNA损伤反应检查点的关键参与者，主要通过破坏其下游靶点Cdc25A和Claspin。然而，要充分了解？的功能还需要进一步的研究。-TRCP参与DNA损伤应答，尤其是G1损伤应答检查点的调控，主要受p53通路调控。Mdm2是p53的主要负调控因子，在肿瘤中经常过表达，但其潜在机制尚不清楚。我们最近报道了SCF？-TRCP是一种新的E3泛素连接酶，靶向Mdm2在CK1？端依赖的方式。但CK1如何？在DNA损伤后被激活以控制Mdm2/p53通路。在具体目标#2中，我们打算通过使用多学科方法来继续这项创新研究，研究ATM如何通过调节CK1来调节Mdm2的稳定性？活动和细胞定位。我们还将研究Mdm2是否是主要的生理信号通路，通过哪些途径？-TRCP调节p53通路来调控DNA损伤反应，以及不可降解的Mdm2（¿p1-23A）是否表现出升高的致癌活性。此外，我们将在临床上探讨Mdm2破坏途径组分（-TRCP/ATM/CK1）的破坏是否促进了肿瘤的发生，这可能是肿瘤中常见的Mdm2积累的原因。我们提出的研究将为控制Mdm2破坏的信号通路提供新的见解。这也为开发CKI和ATM激动剂作为抗癌药物提供了理论依据。