Columbia University Science of Behavior Change Resource and Coordinating Center renewal

哥伦比亚大学行为改变科学资源和协调中心更新

• 批准号: 10685600
• 负责人: Donald Edmondson
• 金额: $ 120.12万
• 依托单位: COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2015
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2015-09-30 至 2025-08-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10685600
• 关键词: Address; Adopted; Adoption; Area; Automation; Award; Basic Science; Behavior; Behavioral; Behavioral Mechanisms; Behavioral Sciences; Clinical; Clinical Sciences; Collaborations; Communication; Communities; Creativeness; Data; Education; Educational workshop; Effectiveness; Ensure; Future; Generations; Goals; Health behavior; Hour; Human; Institution; Internet; Intervention; Intuition; Joints; Lead; Literature; Manuscripts; Measurement; Measures; Medicine; Meta-Analysis; Methods; Modeling; Phase; Play; Practice Guidelines; Process; Productivity; Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance; Reproducibility; Research; Research Personnel; Resources; Role; Science; Scientist; Shapes; Standardization; Structure; Taxonomy; Testing; Translating; United States National Institutes of Health; Universities; Validation; Vision; Visual; Work; behavior change; behavior measurement; behavioral outcome; digital delivery; digital tool; evidence base; implementation science; improved; innovation; international scientific organization; intervention effect; meetings; novel; novel strategies; open data; outreach; podcast; programs; repository; science education; symposium; systematic review; therapy development; tool; usability; web site; webinar; working group

The Columbia University Science of Behavior Change (SOBC) Resource and Coordinating Center (RCC) has been highly successful in coordinating SOBC research efforts, developing digital tools to promote the experimental medicine approach, and disseminating SOBC research practices and products. We now propose to expand on the tools we have developed, to create novel opportunities for basic and applied/clinical science to converge on mechanisms of behavior change. Further, we will continue to serve as a hub for scientists within and outside the SOBC Network to collect, organize, evaluate, discuss, and disseminate rigorous behavioral science. In close collaboration with NIH and the SOBC Network we will: -Expand the SOBC Measures Repository to include both intervention materials and measures of behavioral outcomes—alongside measures of mechanisms. Open the Repository for curation by all scientists, and promote self-sustaining user engagement through delivery of digital tools to (a) organize constructs into visual taxonomies and (b) leverage systematic review data to identify novel opportunities for mechanistic research. Rapidly test and optimize Repository tools and features. -Bring basic and applied/clinical scientists together to promote discovery and improve measurement tools and practices, through collaboration, research syntheses, and support of pilot research. -Conduct outreach and dissemination of the SOBC experimental medicine approach and mechanistic research broadly, through drafting and disseminating best practice guidelines, and developing tools for incorporating and communicating mechanisms-focused research. We will also continue to create engaging conference workshops, webinars, educational video/web/podcast content, and engage with national and international scientific organizations through meetings and joint communications. -Integrate SOBC with related efforts, and detail the role of SOBC/early phase mechanism-focused optimization in the ORBIT framework, NIH Stage Model, and the RE-AIM model. -Conduct systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses of the behavior change literature, to test the impact of applying the experimental medicine approach on research products, and to identify additional potential targets for future validation or research. The SOBC program has begun a profound shift in how behavioral scientists think about behavior change. Over the past 5 years, we played a key role in shaping the SOBC message and building tools to help researchers apply it. Now we propose to ensure its lasting impact by making those tools more rigorous, intuitive, and usable—and by making them accessible to the broader field. Our goal is to make the case for behavioral science to adopt the experimental medicine approach by showing that it improves research impact, and by making adoption so simple that it becomes the default approach.

哥伦比亚大学行为改变科学 (SOBC) 资源和协调中心 (RCC) been highly successful in coordinating SOBC research efforts, developing digital tools to promote the experimental medicine approach, and disseminating SOBC research practices and products.我们现在提议 to expand on the tools we have developed, to create novel opportunities for basic and applied/clinical science to 集中于行为改变的机制。 Further, we will continue to serve as a hub for scientists within and outside the SOBC Network to collect, organize, evaluate, discuss, and disseminate rigorous behavioral 科学。 In close collaboration with NIH and the SOBC Network we will: -Expand the SOBC Measures Repository to include both intervention materials and measures of behavioral outcomes—alongside measures of mechanisms.打开存储库供所有人管理 scientists, and promote self-sustaining user engagement through delivery of digital tools to (a) organize constructs into visual taxonomies and (b) leverage systematic review data to identify novel 机械研究的机会。快速测试和优化存储库工具和功能。 -Bring basic and applied/clinical scientists together to promote discovery and improve measurement tools and practices, through collaboration, research syntheses, and support of pilot research. -开展 SOBC 实验医学方法和机制的推广和传播 通过起草和传播最佳实践指南以及开发工具进行广泛研究 用于整合和交流以机制为重点的研究。我们也将持续创造 参与会议研讨会、网络研讨会、教育视频/网络/播客内容，并与 国家和国际科学组织通过会议和联合通讯。 -将SOBC与相关工作整合，并详细说明SOBC的作用/以早期机制为重点 ORBIT 框架、NIH 阶段模型和 RE-AIM 模型中的优化。 -Conduct systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses of the behavior change literature, to test the 应用实验医学方法对研究产品的影响，并确定 未来验证或研究的其他潜在目标。 SOBC 项目已经开始改变行为科学家对行为的看法 改变。在过去 5 年里，我们在塑造 SOBC 信息和构建工具以实现 SOBC 方面发挥了关键作用 帮助研究人员应用它。现在，我们建议通过使这些工具更加强大来确保其持久影响 严谨、直观且可用——并使它们能够被更广泛的领域所利用。我们的目标是让 行为科学采用实验医学方法的理由是： 提高研究影响力，并使采用变得如此简单，使其成为默认方法。

项目成果

Decomposing variance in co-rumination using dyadic daily diary data.

使用二元每日日记数据分解共同反思中的方差。

• DOI: 10.1177/19485506221116989
• 发表时间: 2023
• 期刊: Social psychological and personality science
• 影响因子: 5.7
• 作者: DiGiovanni,AnaM;Cornelius,Talea;Bolger,Niall
• 通讯作者: Bolger,Niall

What are the keys to a longer, happier life? Answers from five decades of health psychology research.

• DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.001
• 发表时间: 2018-01
• 期刊: Social science & medicine (1982)
• 作者: Johnson BT;Acabchuk RL
• 通讯作者: Acabchuk RL

How best to reduce unhealthy risk-taking behaviours? A meta-review of evidence syntheses of interventions using self-regulation principles.

如何最好地减少不健康的冒险行为？

• DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1707104
• 发表时间: 2020
• 期刊: Health psychology review
• 影响因子: 9.8
• 作者: Protogerou,Cleo;McHugh,RKathryn;Johnson,BlairT
• 通讯作者: Johnson,BlairT

Anxiety Sensitivity as a Malleable Mechanistic Target for Prevention Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Brief Treatment Interventions.

• DOI: 10.1037/cps0000038
• 发表时间: 2021-12
• 期刊: Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association
• 作者: Fitzgerald HE;Hoyt DL;Kredlow MA;Smits JAJ;Schmidt NB;Edmondson D;Otto MW
• 通讯作者: Otto MW

An integrated model of condom use in Sub-Saharan African youth: A meta-analysis.

• DOI: 10.1037/hea0000604
• 发表时间: 2018-06
• 期刊: Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association
• 作者: Protogerou C;Johnson BT;Hagger MS
• 通讯作者: Hagger MS