Standards of Scientific Conduct

科学行为标准

• 批准号: 7491756
• 负责人: MICHAEL W KALICHMAN
• 金额: $ 22.54万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2007
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2007-09-01 至 2011-05-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/7491756
• 关键词: Address; Agreement; Area; Authorship; Biomedical Research; Collaborations; Discipline; Disputes; Education; Educational process of instructing; Empirical Research; Faculty; Focus Groups; Fostering; Goals; Interview; Investigation; Microbiology; Neurological Nursing; Online Systems; Outcome; Positioning Attribute; Psychology; Public Health; Reporting; Research; Research Personnel; Research Project Grants; Resources; Role; Scientist; Standards of Weights and Measures; Surveys; Variant; base; data management; instructor; interest; programs

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Discussion of standards of responsible conduct of research (RCR) is recognized as an important part of RCR education. However, almost no empirical research has addressed the common practices of scientists, the views of scientists about ideal standards, or how practices and ideals vary among different research disciplines. We strongly believe that scientists are in the best position to identify and articulate selected standards of scientific conduct. Therefore, we propose to poll active research scientists about standards in three areas: data management, collaboration, and authorship. This will be accomplished with focus group discussions, interviews, and a survey. Recognizing that differences are likely to occur not only within research areas, but also between research areas, four different disciplines have been selected for study: microbiology, neuroscience, nursing, and psychology. The two specific aims of this project are: (1) Construct framework for national survey of RCR standards (focus group discussions with mixed discipline and discipline-specific groups of researchers) and (2) Conduct national survey of RCR standards (interviews of research scientists and Web-based survey of faculty in doctoral programs for each of the four disciplines). Variation of standards within research disciplines as well as differences between disciplines will be identified. The results of this investigation will provide an evidence-based rationale for what RCR course instructors should teach about the standards of responsible conduct. Effective teaching about standards of the responsible conduct of research will help to promote public health by fostering integrity in the conduct of biomedical research.

描述（由申请人提供）：讨论负责任的研究行为标准（RCR）被认为是RCR教育的重要组成部分。然而，几乎没有实证研究涉及科学家的共同实践，科学家对理想标准的看法，或者不同研究学科之间的实践和理想如何变化。我们坚信，科学家是确定和阐明选定的科学行为标准的最佳人选。因此，我们建议对活跃的研究科学家进行民意调查

项目成果

Standards of scientific conduct: are there any?

科学行为标准：有吗？

• DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9500-1
• 发表时间: 2014
• 期刊: Science and engineering ethics
• 影响因子: 3.7
• 作者: Kalichman,Michael;Sweet,Monica;Plemmons,Dena
• 通讯作者: Plemmons,Dena

Establishing good collaborative research practices in the responsible conduct of research in nursing science.

在负责任的护理科学研究中建立良好的合作研究实践。

• DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.10.007
• 发表时间: 2015
• 期刊: Nursing outlook
• 影响因子: 4.3
• 作者: Ulrich,ConnieM;Wallen,GwenythR;Cui,Naixue;Chittams,Jesse;Sweet,Monica;Plemmons,Dena
• 通讯作者: Plemmons,Dena

A brief history of RCR education.

• DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822260
• 发表时间: 2013
• 期刊: Accountability in research
• 作者: Kalichman M

Rescuing responsible conduct of research (RCR) education.

• DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822271
• 发表时间: 2014
• 期刊: Accountability in research
• 作者: Kalichman M