Clinical & Transitional Research Support

临床

• 批准号: 7712888
• 负责人: RICHARD W SERNA
• 金额: $ 21.46万
• 依托单位: UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2008
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2008-07-01 至 2010-06-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/7712888
• 关键词: Address; Area; Basic Science; Behavior; Behavioral; Clinical; Clinical Research; Cognitive; Collaborations; Consent; Critiques; Databases; Developmental Disabilities; Diagnostic; Dimensions; Doctor of Medicine; Doctor of Philosophy; Effectiveness; Ensure; Funding; Goals; Health; Human; Individual; Information Resources; Interdisciplinary Study; Language; Mental Retardation; Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Centers; Numbers; Participant; Population; Preparation; Procedures; Protocols documentation; Purpose; Quality Control; Range; Rate; Recruitment Activity; Research; Research Ethics Committees; Research Personnel; Research Project Grants; Research Support; Resources; Scientist; Score; Screening procedure; Services; Source; Specialist; Support of Research; Testing; Training; Translational Research; Vulnerable Populations; base; experience; interest; multidisciplinary; programs

CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH SUPPORT Kathleen Braden, M.D., Richard W. Serna, Ph.D., & Edward I. Ginns, M.D., Ph.D. Introduction to Revised Proposal This is a revision of a proposal that was submitted with our 2002 application (priority score: 190). That revision built on many areas of strength noted in its predecessor (submitted with the 2000 application), and was apparently judged a noteworthy improvement. Despite a generally positive review, however, aspects of the 2002 proposal were insufficiently clear and/or not adequately defended, leading to certain reviewer concerns and a less-than-"outstanding" rating. What follows will summarize strengths noted in our past reviews, the reviewer concerns, and the steps taken in this revised proposal to address those concerns. Strengths (2000/2002 proposals combined) 1. Centralized participant recruitment 2. Centralized management of IRB and consent procedures 3. Procedures for maintaining contact with participants and referral sources 4. Central database with desktop access for investigators 5. Specialized participant preparation (e.g., mock scanner) 6. Inclusion of behavioral specialist to assist with preliminary training 7. Ample resources for accomplishing the Core's aims 8. Provision of health screen for participants 9. An interdisciplinary research review team 10. Addition of applied behavior analysts

临床和翻译研究支持 凯瑟琳·布雷登，医学博士，Richard W. Serna博士，爱德华岛Ginns，医学博士，博士 修订提案介绍 这是对我们2002年申请时提交的提案的修改（优先级分数：190）。的 修订建立在其前身（与2000年申请一起提交）中指出的许多优势领域， 显然被认为是一个值得注意的进步。然而，尽管总体评价是积极的， 2002年提案的某些方面不够明确和（或）没有得到充分的辩护， 评论者的关注和低于“优秀”的评级。以下内容将总结 我们过去的审查，审查者的关注，以及在本修订提案中为解决这些问题而采取的步骤 性问题 优势（2000/2002年提议合并） 1.集中招募参与者 2. IRB和知情同意程序的集中管理 3.与参与者和转介来源保持联系的程序 4.中央数据库，可供调查人员使用台式电脑 5.专业的参与者准备（例如，模拟扫描仪） 6.包括行为专家，以协助初步培训 7.为实现核心的目标提供充足的资源 8.为参与者提供健康检查 9.一个跨学科的研究审查小组 10.增加应用行为分析师