Validation of Measures of real-world outcome

描述（由申请人提供）：这项合作研究（其配套应用程序的 P.I. 是 Thomas Patterson 博士）旨在验证对精神分裂症患者现实世界 (RW) 功能结果的评估。精神分裂症患者的社交和职业功能、自我护理以及独立生活的能力常常受到损害。这些损害不仅会恶化患者的生活质量，还会增加其疾病的社会成本。尽管这些损伤在大多数患者中都很明显，但令人惊讶的是，人们很少关注这些结果评估的有效性。由于目前预测精神分裂症功能障碍的首选工具是神经心理学（NP）测试，因此减少残疾的建议往往侧重于认知障碍的短期治疗。然而，此类试验不太适合诱导或识别现实世界功能的改善。一些研究人员建议改用功能能力测量，但是，最近的证据表明，功能能力测量、NP 测试结果和现实世界结果之间获得的相关性很大程度上取决于所使用的现实世界评级量表。因此，需要进行系统研究来确定衡量现实世界残疾及其对治疗反应的最佳方法。本提案具有三个不同的目标。它的目的是确定：（1）评估精神分裂症现实世界结果的最准确和实用的量表； (2) 秤的最佳使用者； (3) 可能损害精神分裂症患者真实世界结果自我报告有效性的因素。我们采用构造验证方法，使用 NP 测试和功能能力测量作为构造指标，并检查各种现实世界结果测量与这两个指标的收敛性。将进行复杂的数据分析以确定收敛性，并将进行重新测试以确定候选措施的重测稳定性。总体目标是确定衡量精神分裂症现实世界残疾的改进策略，并为下一代旨在通过药理学和认知补救增强认知和功能的治疗试验提供最合适的结果测量。

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This collaborative study (the P.I. of whose companion application is Dr. Thomas Patterson) aims to validate assessments of real-world (RW) functional outcomes in people with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia patients are often impaired in their social and occupational functioning, their self-care, and their ability to live independently. Not only do these impairments worsen the patient's quality of life, they also increase the societal cost of his or her illness. While these impairments are evident in most patients, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the validity of assessments of these outcomes. Since the current tool of choice in predicting functional disability in schizophrenia is neuropsychological (NP) testing, proposals to reduce disability have tended to focus on short-term treatment of cognitive impairments. However, such trials are not well suited either to induce or identify improvements in real-world functioning. Some researchers have proposed switching to measures of functional capacity instead, but, recent evidence suggests that the correlations obtained between functional-capacity measures, NP test results, and real-world outcomes are largely a function of the real-world rating scale that is used. Thus systematic studies are needed to determine the optimal means for measuring real-world disability and its response to treatment. The present proposal has three distinct goals. It aims to determine: (1) the most accurate and practical scale for rating real-world outcomes in schizophrenia; (2) the optimal user of the scale; and (3) the factors that may impair the validity of self-reports of real-world outcomes on the part of schizophrenia patients. We adopt a construct-validation approach, using NP testing and functional-capacity measures as indicators of the construct and examining the convergence of various real-world outcome measures with these two indicators. Sophisticated data analysis will be performed to determine the convergences, and retesting will be performed to determine the test-retest stability of the candidate measures. The overall goal is to identify improved strategies for measuring real-world disability in schizophrenia and to inform the coming generation of treatment trials aimed at cognitive and functional enhancement through pharmacology and cognitive remediation in terms of the most suitable outcomes measures.