Brief Assessment of Health Literacy and Association with Cardiovascular Outcomes

健康素养及其与心血管结局的关系的简要评估

• 批准号: 7849444
• 负责人: SUNIL KRIPALANI
• 金额: $ 19.38万
• 依托单位: VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2010
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2010-07-05 至 2012-04-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/7849444
• 关键词: Accident and Emergency department; Acute; Address; Admission activity; Adult; Age; Ambulatory Care; Area; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular system; Clinical; Computerized Medical Record; Data Collection; Databases; Diagnosis; Documentation; Education; Effectiveness; Effectiveness of Interventions; Electronic Health Record; Enrollment; Environment; Epidemiologic Studies; Equation; Evaluation; Factor Analysis; Health; Health Status; Health system; Heart failure; Hospitals; Human Resources; Hypertension; Institute of Medicine (U.S.); Intervention; Interviewer; Learning; Measures; Medical; Medicine; Modeling; Nurses; Nursing Audit; Observational Study; Outcome; Outcome Measure; Outpatients; Patient Care; Patients; Persons; Psychometrics; Publishing; Race; Reading; Reporting; Research; Research Training; Screening procedure; Surveys; System; Testing; Time; Training; University Hospitals; Visit; Writing; base; blood pressure regulation; clinical care; cohort; demographics; follow-up; functional health literacy; health literacy; hospital readmission; literacy; nursing history; patient population; patient safety; prospective; public health relevance; response; tool; uptake

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Data collection for health literacy research is labor intensive because the most widely used measures of health literacy are administered in-person by trained research staff. This limits our ability to perform large epidemiological studies on the consequences of inadequate health literacy. It also restricts our ability to assess the effectiveness of health system interventions by level of health literacy, because this critical variable is not being recorded in clinical databases. These important forms of research would be facilitated by the availability of a brief, verbally-administered measure of health literacy. Three short questions ("How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?," "How often do you have someone help you read hospital materials?," and "How often do you have problems learning about your medical condition because of difficulty understanding written information?") effectively identified patients with inadequate health literacy in 5 previous studies. However, these items have not yet been tested outside of the ambulatory care setting or when administered by clinical personnel. Rigorous psychometric analyses have not yet been performed, nor has their association with clinical outcomes been examined. The Specific Aims of this proposal are to: 1) Establish the feasibility of incorporating brief health literacy questions into an electronic health record (EHR) upon hospital admission for use as a research tool, 2) Perform a psychometric evaluation of the brief health literacy questions, and 3) Examine the independent association of the brief health literacy questions with important clinical outcomes including blood pressure control and heart failure readmissions. For Aim 1, we will incorporate the items into the admission nursing history at Vanderbilt University Hospital (VUH), train nurses in their administration, examine uptake of the health literacy measure by auditing nursing documentation of the items in the EHR, and observe encounters for fidelity of scale administration. For Aim 2, we will define a large retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients and enroll a smaller prospective cohort. We will assess internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability, use structural equation modeling to perform confirmatory factor analysis, and examine construct validity by comparing responses on the health literacy questions to patient demographics and another health literacy measure. For Aim 3, we will define a retrospective cohort of patients who are admitted to VUH with a pre-existing diagnosis of hypertension, and a second cohort admitted for acute decompensated heart failure. We will examine the association of the brief health literacy items with blood pressure at the time of hospital admission and at outpatient follow-up in the hypertension cohort, and Emergency Department visits and hospital readmission within 60 days of discharge in the heart failure cohort. By examining the health literacy items alone and in combination, and controlling for age, race, and education, we will determine which item(s) are best suited as a brief measure of health literacy. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: The Institute of Medicine report on health literacy called for additional research to better understand the consequences of inadequate health literacy, as well as system-based interventions to address health literacy, which should analyze intervention effectiveness by level of health literacy. However, progress in these areas is being limited by the absence of a valid and brief measure of health literacy that can be incorporated into large surveys or into the electronic health record for use as a research tool. This research seeks to validate 3 candidate health literacy questions which could be used widely for such research.

描述（由申请人提供）：卫生素养研究的数据收集是劳动密集型的，因为最广泛使用的卫生素养措施是由训练有素的研究人员亲自管理的。这限制了我们对卫生知识普及不足的后果进行大规模流行病学研究的能力。它还限制了我们根据卫生素养水平评估卫生系统干预措施有效性的能力，因为这一关键变量没有记录在临床数据库中。提供一种简短、口头管理的卫生知识普及措施将促进这些重要形式的研究。三个简短的问题(“你有多大信心自己填写医疗表格？”“你多久请人帮你阅读一次医院资料？”以及“你多久会因为难以理解书面信息而在了解自己的健康状况方面遇到困难？”)在先前的5项研究中有效地识别出健康素养不足的患者。然而，这些项目尚未在门诊护理环境之外或由临床人员管理时进行测试。目前还没有进行严格的心理测量分析，也没有检查它们与临床结果的关系。本提案的具体目的是：1)建立在入院时将简短健康素养问题纳入电子健康记录（EHR）作为研究工具的可行性，2)对简短健康素养问题进行心理测量评估，以及3)检查简短健康素养问题与重要临床结果（包括血压控制和心力衰竭再入院）的独立关联。在目标1中，我们将把这些项目纳入范德比尔特大学医院（VUH）的入院护理史，培训护士的管理，通过审核电子病历中项目的护理文件来检查健康素养措施的采用情况，并观察量表管理的保密性。在目的2中，我们将定义一个住院患者的大型回顾性队列，并招募一个较小的前瞻性队列。我们将评估内部一致性信度和重测信度，使用结构方程模型进行验证性因子分析，并通过将健康素养问题的回答与患者人口统计学和另一种健康素养测量相比较来检验结构效度。在Aim 3中，我们将定义一个回顾性队列，其中包括先前诊断为高血压的VUH患者，以及另一个急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者。我们将研究高血压组住院时和门诊随访时的血压与简要健康素养项目的关系，以及心力衰竭组出院后60天内急诊科就诊和再入院的关系。通过单独和组合检查健康素养项目，并控制年龄、种族和教育，我们将确定哪些项目最适合作为健康素养的简短衡量标准。