课题基金 / 基金详情

Quantitative methods for risk management

Quantitative methods for risk management
风险管理的定量方法
批准号:
RGPIN-2020-06088
负责人:
Furman, Edward
金额:
$1.97万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
加拿大
项目类别:
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
财政年份:
2022
资助国家:
加拿大
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2022-01-01 至 2023-12-31

项目摘要

项目成果

Furman, Edward的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
``They are making those assumptions in order to do their fancy maths!'' is an accusation that all of us, academic actuaries, have heard from practitioners, irrespective of how mathematically savvy these practitioners are. Just a few days ago, Stephen Richards, a practicing actuary (FFA) and a Ph.D. in Mathematics criticized in an acerbic manner ``fancy mathematical models that have zero connection with reality'' at a joint Risk and Insurance Studies Centre / Schulich School of Business colloquium talk. Whether or not there is some truth to Stephen's words, as responsible academic we have to be aware of this rather common opinion, which aggravates the already profound gap between the ivory tower and the workplace reality. This proposal is an effort to put forward deep mathematical methods, which solve those problems that are brought up by practicing risk professionals. Three distinct and yet connected research threads, which are risk aggregation, risk allocation and variability assessment, are explored in this proposal critically through the lens of a dubious risk practitioner. Specifically, we address somewhat inconvenient but salient questions that all go like this: "What if assumption XYZ is inappropriate?", where the various XYZs were identified by a number of actuaries and quantitative risk professionals in Canadian insurance companies and banks. Speaking briefly: In Section 1, we put forward an efficient algorithm, which is able to approximate - fast and accurately irrespective of the number of summands and involved heavy-tailedness - the distributions of sums of dependent risks having distributions in distinct parametric families; In Section 2, we argue for a paradigm shift as to how risk capital allocations should be treated and, as a by product, we unify the top-down and the bottom-up approaches to allocate risk capital; In Section 3, we shed light on the routes to measure variability in leu of variance, and in particular, we propose to develop heavy-tailed variations of the celebrated Hattendorff's theorem that allocate the variability - when measured by coherent and comonotonically additive measures of variability - to future years for virtually any payment stream and rule for accumulation of interest. The methodologies that will be coming out of the proposed research are truly industry-driven and so of direct translational importance, as well as rigorous and of the highest academic caliber. Paraphrasing Steve Jobs, I can genuinely say that it is beautiful mathematics married with social good that makes my heart sing. I am really thrilled about the capable translational research, of which this proposal is an example.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Quantitative methods for risk management
  • 批准号:
    RGPIN-2020-06088
  • 项目类别:
    Discovery Grants Program - Individual
  • 资助金额:
    $1.97万
  • 财政年份:
    2021
  • 负责人:
    Furman, Edward
  • 依托单位:
Quantitative methods for risk management
  • 批准号:
    RGPIN-2020-06088
  • 项目类别:
    Discovery Grants Program - Individual
  • 资助金额:
    $1.97万
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 负责人:
    Furman, Edward
  • 依托单位:
Quantitative methods for modelling and pricing dependenent insurance risks
  • 批准号:
    RGPIN-2014-05272
  • 项目类别:
    Discovery Grants Program - Individual
  • 资助金额:
    $1.02万
  • 财政年份:
    2019
  • 负责人:
    Furman, Edward
  • 依托单位:
Quantitative methods for modelling and pricing dependenent insurance risks
  • 批准号:
    RGPIN-2014-05272
  • 项目类别:
    Discovery Grants Program - Individual
  • 资助金额:
    $1.02万
  • 财政年份:
    2018
  • 负责人:
    Furman, Edward
  • 依托单位:
国内基金
海外基金
复杂图像处理中的自由非连续问题及其水平集方法研究
  • 批准号:
    60872130
  • 项目类别:
    面上项目
  • 资助金额:
    28.0万元
  • 批准年份:
    2008
  • 负责人:
    刘国才
  • 依托单位:
Computational Methods for Analyzing Toponome Data