Minimum Reporting Standards for in vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRSinMRS): Experts' consensus recommendations.
Minimum Reporting Standards for in vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRSinMRS): Experts' consensus recommendations.
复制标题
体内磁共振光谱法（MRSINMR）的最低报告标准：专家的共识建议。
DOI：
10.1002/nbm.4484
复制
发表时间：
2021-05
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Experts' Working Group on Reporting Standards for MR Spectroscopy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lin A;Andronesi O;Bogner W;Choi IY;Coello E;Cudalbu C;Juchem C;Kemp GJ;Kreis R;Krššák M;Lee P;Maudsley AA;Meyerspeer M;Mlynarik V;Near J;Öz G;Peek AL;Puts NA;Ratai EM;Tkáč I;Mullins PG;Experts' Working Group on Reporting Standards for MR Spectroscopy
由于缺乏技术标准化，MRS向临床实践的转化受到阻碍。有多种采集、后处理和分析方法，其细节极大地影响了结果的解释。这些细节往往没有完全报告，使得很难在标准化的基础上评估MRS研究。这妨碍了手稿的审查，限制了研究结果的再现性，并使文献的Meta分析复杂化。在本文中，一个共识小组的MRS专家提供了最低限度的指导方针，报告的MRS方法和结果，包括标准化的描述MRS硬件，数据采集，分析和质量评估。该共识声明详细描述了这些要求中的每一项，并包括一个清单，以帮助作者和期刊评审员，并为期刊编辑提供一种实用的方法，以确保MRS研究得到完整的报道。本文阐述了专家对MRS研究最低报告指南的共识。它包括一个检查表，作为作者和期刊编辑确保MRS研究得到适当报道的实用方法。一套通用的报告标准将大大提高MRS研究的透明度、严谨性和可复制性，并应进一步将MRS成功整合到广泛的临床实践中。
The translation of MRS to clinical practice has been impeded by the lack of technical standardization. There are multiple methods of acquisition, post‐processing, and analysis whose details greatly impact the interpretation of the results. These details are often not fully reported, making it difficult to assess MRS studies on a standardized basis. This hampers the reviewing of manuscripts, limits the reproducibility of study results, and complicates meta‐analysis of the literature. In this paper a consensus group of MRS experts provides minimum guidelines for the reporting of MRS methods and results, including the standardized description of MRS hardware, data acquisition, analysis, and quality assessment. This consensus statement describes each of these requirements in detail and includes a checklist to assist authors and journal reviewers and to provide a practical way for journal editors to ensure that MRS studies are reported in full. This paper sets out the expert consensus on minimum reporting guidelines for MRS studies. It includes a checklist as a practical way for authors and journal editors to ensure that MRS studies are reported appropriately. A common set of reporting standards will greatly increase transparency, rigor, and replicability of MRS studies, and should further the successful integration of MRS into widespread clinical practice.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
通讯作者：
--
MRS的运动校正方法：专家的共识建议。
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Andronesi OC;Bhattacharyya PK;Bogner W;Choi IY;Hess AT;Lee P;Meintjes EM;Tisdall MD;Zaitzev M;van der Kouwe A
通讯作者：
van der Kouwe A
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Maudsley AA;Andronesi OC;Barker PB;Bizzi A;Bogner W;Henning A;Nelson SJ;Posse S;Shungu DC;Soher BJ
通讯作者：
Soher BJ
DOI：
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004
发表时间：
2010-01-01
期刊：
Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal
影响因子：
--
作者：
Schulz, Kenneth F;Altman, Douglas G;Moher, David
通讯作者：
Moher, David
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
KREIS, R;ERNST, T;ROSS, BD
通讯作者：
ROSS, BD