The lure of antagonistic social strategy in unstable socioecological environment: Residential mobility facilitates individuals' antisocial behavior

The lure of antagonistic social strategy in unstable socioecological environment: Residential mobility facilitates individuals' antisocial behavior
复制标题

不稳定社会生态环境中对抗性社会策略的诱惑:居住流动性促进个体反社会行为

DOI:
10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.002
复制
发表时间:
2018-05
影响因子:
5.1
通讯作者:
Wang Fang
Wang Fang
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zuo Shijiang;Huang Niwen;Cai Pan;Wang Fang

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

人们认为,个人会根据他们所处的社会生态环境来调整他们的反社会水平。然而,关于特定社会生态因素与反社会行为之间关系的知识仍然很少。本研究以人类居住流动性为研究对象,探讨其对反社会行为的影响。三项研究旨在验证高(相对于低)居住流动性的个体倾向于更频繁地从事反社会行为的假设。结果表明,自我报告的居住流动性(研究1)和操纵的居住流动性(研究2和研究3)对个体反社会水平有正向预测作用。此外,我们发现社会监测在调节居住流动与反社会行为之间的联系中发挥了作用(研究3);居住流动性高的个体在使用人工眼观察时反社会行为有所减少,而居住流动性低的个体则相反。综上所述,这项研究表明,一般来说,住宅流动是增加反社会行为的一个社会生态因素,而社会监控可以对这种行为产生多种影响。
Individuals are believed to calibrate their antisocial level in response to the socioecological environment where they live. However, knowledge of the relationship between specific socioecological factors and antisocial behavior remains scant. This research focused on humans' residential mobility and explored its influence on antisocial behavior. Three studies were designed to test the hypothesis that individuals with high (vs. low) residential mobility tend to engage in antisocial behavior more frequently. The results showed that both self-reported residential mobility (Study 1) and manipulated residential mobility (Studies 2 and 3) positively predicted individuals' antisocial level. Furthermore, we found that social monitoring played a role in moderating the linkage between residential mobility and antisocial behavior (Study 3); individuals with high residential mobility decreased their antisocial behavior when they were observed by artificial eyes, while individuals with low residential mobility did the opposite. Taken together, this research suggests that, generally speaking, residential mobility is one socioecological factor that increases antisocial behavior, and that social monitoring can have diverse effects on such behavior.
DOI: 10.1177/1474704915594959
发表时间: 2015-09-01
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
Oda, Ryo;Kato, Yuta;Hiraishi, Kai
通讯作者: Hiraishi, Kai
DOI: 10.11228/pcs1981.1986.8_67
发表时间: 1986-12
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
Shigeru Watanabe
通讯作者: Shigeru Watanabe
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvjf9xvk.10
发表时间: 2009-04
影响因子: 36.8
作者:
Mauro Santos;E. Szathmáry
通讯作者: Mauro Santos;E. Szathmáry
DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000139
发表时间: 2017-08-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Jones, Daniel N.;Paulhus, Delroy L.
通讯作者: Paulhus, Delroy L.
DOI: 10.2307/2392957
发表时间: 1981-07
期刊: Nature
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
Robert M. May
通讯作者: Robert M. May