Juvenile delinquency in political interdiscourse: Interpretations of deviante in the context of a "punitive turn"

对青少年犯罪的处理方式经常变化。目前，“惩罚性转向”的论文被用作重建这种变化的参考，表明自20世纪70年代以来，惩罚（惩罚性）的意愿不断上升。然而，正如广泛的科学辩论所表明的那样，人们需要区分惩罚的特定方面：在某些层面上，职业/机构、政治政策以及大众媒体之间存在相互作用，但人们需要仔细区分它们。目前的项目，“青年犯罪的相互话语”的目的是分析青年福利服务和警察在青少年犯罪的介绍中，在每个专业的实用导向期刊的相互话语。特别是在社会工作领域，调查结果显示出明显的转变;除其他外，这体现在与司法当局的合作日益增加，社会工作越来越愿意相对化其对社会经济制度的立场，对社会机构的批评越来越少。此外，对惩罚性的进一步研究得出了关于机构主导者（主要是公诉部门和少年法庭）的重要结论。此外，大众媒体针对青少年犯罪的话语也得到了充分的研究。然而，（司法）政治政策的系统分析仍然缺乏，虽然这些贡献是高度相关的专业和机构处理少年越轨行为。在这一背景下，随后的项目“政治对话中的青少年犯罪”旨在审查1970年至2009年的议会辩论，再次利用对对话的分析。本分析侧重于联邦议院（联邦议会）、联邦参议院（各组成州理事会）以及巴伐利亚、石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因、汉堡和萨克森-安哈尔特四个州议会的辩论。议会辩论面向公众，与司法和政治改革直接相关。因此，这对处理青少年越轨行为极为重要。未来的研究结果，然后将与已经获得的结果的介绍青年越轨行为提出的每一个行业。在对政治政策的研究之后，未来的项目将因此澄清在社会工作和警务领域中发现的话语的凝聚力及其特定的政治定位。

The treatment of juvenile delinquency is subject to constant change. Currently, the thesis of a 'punitive turn' is used as a reference for reconstructing this alteration, indicating a rising willingness to punish (punitivity) since the 1970s. However, as the broad scientific debate illustrates, one needs to differentiate between particular dimensions of punitivity: There is an interaction between professions/institutions, political policies as well as the mass media on certain levels, but one needs to carefully differentiate between them. The aim of the current project, "youth delinquency in the interdiscourse", is to analyze the interdiscourses of the youth welfare service and the police within the presentation of youth delinquency in the practical orientated periodicals of each profession. In the field of social work, especially, the findings indicate a distinct transformation; inter alia, this is evident in the increasing cooperation with judicial authorities, and the growing willingness of social work to relativize its stance on the socio-economic system, becoming less critical towards social institutions. In addition, further research on punitivity produced significant findings on institutional protagonists (mainly the department of public prosecution and juvenile court). Furthermore, discourses of mass media targeting juvenile delinquency have been studied adequately. However, a systematic analysis of (juridical-) political policies is still lacking, although these contributions are of high relevance for the professional and institutional processing of juvenile deviance. Against this background, the subsequent project, "juvenile delinquency in political interdiscourse", aims at examining the parliamentary debates from 1970 until 2009, utilizing once more the analysis of interdiscourse. This analysis focuses on the debates in the Bundestag (Federal Parliament), the Bundesrat (Council of Constituent States) as well as the four state parliaments of Bavaria, Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg and Saxony-Anhalt. Parliamentary debates are addressed at the public and are of immediate relevance to both juridical and political reforms. Hence, they are of utmost importance for the handling of juvenile deviance. The future findings are then to be correlated with the already acquired results of the presentations of youth deviance put forward by each profession. Next to the investigation of political policies, the future project shall thereby clarify the cohesion of discourses to be found in the field of social work and policing with their specific political positioning.