Investigating the Relationship Between Teacher-Level and Student-Level Factors and NAEP Mathematics Test Performance by American Indian and Alaska Native Students

西sted的研究人员进行了一项探索性研究，研究了教师水平因素（包括教师背景变量和教学实践）和学生水平因素（如自我评估的数学兴趣和熟练程度）以及这些因素之间的相互作用，这些因素与美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民（AI/AN）学生在中学数学方面的学习成绩有关。最终目标是确定可塑因素，如果改变，可以改善教师的实践和AI/AN学生在数学方面的成绩。这项研究主要分为两个阶段。第一阶段是探索2007年全国印度教育研究（NIES）的数据，该研究汇编了学生在NAEP评估中的表现信息，并通过个人问卷从AI/AN学生及其教师的大量样本中收集了信息。NIES信息将NAEP绩效数据和NIES调查数据联系起来，有助于理解特定的教师水平因素和学生水平因素（以及这两个因素之间的相互作用）与学生学习的关系。层次线性模型（HLM）被用于研究学生/教师水平因素与学生成绩之间的关系。研究的第二阶段包括对来自数百个访谈和课堂观察的数据进行定性分析，这些访谈和课堂观察来自阿拉斯加州、亚利桑那州、和新墨西哥州，以加深对AI/AN教学背景的理解，以及为什么特定的教师水平和学生水平因素与学生在NAEP数学评估中的表现有/没有关联。研究数据源和多层次建模技术的应用将揭示特定文化背景下的教师如何应用标准，适应和实施课程。并以促进学生学习和成就的方式评估学生。这项工作的长期回报将是加强对如何提供具有文化响应性的STEM教育的理解，提高AI/AN学生在STEM职业和受STEM影响的社会和个人决策中的表现和参与度。

This exploratory study by researchers at WestEd is examining ways that teacher-level factors (including teacher background variables and instructional practices) and student-level factors (such as self-rated mathematics interest and proficiency), and interactions among these factors, are associated with American Indian/Alaska native (AI/AN) student academic achievement in middle grades mathematics. The ultimate goal is to identify malleable factors that, if changed, could improve teachers' practices and AI/AN student achievement in mathematics.The study has two main phases. Phase I is exploring data from the 2007 National Indian Education Study (NIES), which compiled information on student performance on NAEP assessments and collected information from a large sample of AI/AN students and their teachers through individual questionnaires. The NIES information links NAEP performance data and NIES survey data in ways that will assist understanding of how particular teacher-level factors and student-level factors (and the interactions between these two factors) relate to student learning. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) is being used to study the relationship between student/teacher-level factors and student performance. Phase II of the study involves qualitative analysis of data from several hundred interviews and classroom observations in selected schools at three sites in Alaska, Arizona, and New Mexico to enable deeper understanding of AI/AN contexts of teaching and learning and why particular teacher-level and student-level factors are/are not associated with student performance on the NAEP mathematics assessment as analyzed in Phase I. Study data sources and application of multi-level modeling techniques will shed light on how teachers in particular cultural settings apply standards, adapt and implement curriculum, and assess their students in ways that promote student learning and achievement. The long-term payoff from this work will be enhanced understanding of ways to provide culturally responsive STEM education and increased performance and participation of AI/AN students in STEM careers and STEM-affected social and personal decision-making.