WORKSHOP: Ethics in Experimental Political Science- May 2016

在实验政治学的道德问题的意识正在增长。该研讨会汇集了政治学学者和研究诚信学者，以解决在伦理设计，审查和实施实验研究的关键需求。与以往的政治学讨论不同，本次研讨会邀请了从事实验研究的政治科学家和人类研究伦理方面的专家，旨在制定保护人类研究对象、研究人员、政治学领域、高等教育机构和公众对科学的投资的最佳实践建议。技术总结实验政治学中的伦理问题意识正在增强。该研讨会汇集了政治学学者和研究诚信学者，以解决在伦理设计，审查和实施实验研究的关键需求。与以往的政治学讨论不同，这次研讨会既包括从事实验研究的政治科学家，也包括人类研究伦理学的专家。特邀演讲者和讨论者将以小组和圆桌会议的形式讨论以下问题领域：（1）同意和欺骗性研究中的特殊问题;（2）管理偶然发现以及附带和社区危害;（3）与社区和行业合作伙伴合作开展负责任的研究;（4）提高社区在国际赞助的研究中进行审查和同意的能力;（5）在评估风险、伤害和剥削时确定描述性和规范性基线;（6）量化心理伤害;（7）使用现有数据集时的特殊问题。

General SummaryAwareness of ethical issues in experimental political science is growing. This workshop brings together political science scholars and research integrity scholars to address critical needs in the ethical design, review, and implementation of experimental research. Unlike past discussions within political science, this workshop includes both political scientists engaged in experimental research and experts in the ethics of human-subjects research to develop best practice recommendations that will protect human subjects, researchers, the field of political science, institutions of higher learning, and the public's investment in science.Technical SummaryAwareness of ethical issues in experimental political science is growing. This workshop brings together political science scholars and research integrity scholars to address critical needs in the ethical design, review, and implementation of experimental research. Unlike past discussions within political science, this workshop includes both political scientists engaged in experimental research and experts in the ethics of human-subjects research. Invited speakers and discussants will address in both panel and round table form the following issue areas: (1) special issues in consent and deceptive research; (2) managing incidental findings and collateral and community harms; (3) working with community and industry partners to conduct responsible research; (4) enhancing community capacity for review and consent in internationally sponsored research; (5) identifying descriptive and normative baselines when assessing risk, harm, and exploitation; (6) quantifying psychological harms; and (7) special concerns when using pre-existing data sets.