Science Policy Research Report: Facilitating the Use of Evidence in Science Policy Making

sciip项目的结果为国会和科学资助机构提供了有用的基础科学政策见解，但学术研究人员和政策制定者之间的联系往往还没有建立起来。有用的证据发表在学术文章中，而不是以可访问的形式提供。本项目旨在通过提供关于在政策制定过程中加强学术研究的最有效方法的基于证据的建议，增加科学和创新政策新见解的传播。这份政策报告深入探讨了向决策者传达结果的方法，旨在促进在政府决策中使用科学政策证据。本报告特别侧重于研究整合者的作用，他们旨在为学术研究人员和政策制定者架起桥梁。该报告回顾了早期循证医学运动的经验教训，就在专业实践中应用证据时最大限度地减少已知障碍的过程提出建议。本文分析了四个影响科学政策制定的学术研究案例，以确定增加政策影响的扩散设计要素。吸取的经验教训将被纳入旨在促进在科学决策中使用证据的建议。

Results from the SciSIP program provide fundamental science policy insights useful to Congress and science funding agencies yet often connections between academic researchers and policy makers are under developed. Useful evidence is published in academic articles and is not available in an accessible form. This project aims to increase the diffusion of new insights in science and innovation policy by providing evidence based recommendations about the most effective ways to enhance the use of academic research in the policy making process. This policy report develops insights into the communication of results to policy makers and aims to facilitate the use of science policy evidence in government decision making.  This report focuses particularly on the role of research integrators who aim to bridge academic researchers and policy makers.  The report reviews lessons learned in the earlier evidence based medicine movement to provide recommendations on processes that will minimize known obstacles in application of evidence in professional practice. Four case studies of academic research that had an impact on science policy making are analyzed to ascertain diffusion design elements that increase policy impact. The lessons learned will be integrated into recommendations aimed at facilitating use of evidence in science policy making.