Coordination Funds

我们的媒介参与理论是基于一种过程性的媒介性，这种媒介性使参与的关系集合和异质结构失效。因此，可以通过媒体化进程及其共同构成关系来描述参与。在接下来的阶段，我们将在现代性范围内谈判可能的替代方案的背景下强调历史和政治方面。这不仅允许在关系人类学领域对“关系性”进行批判性观察，而且还允许一种特定的理论化，通过这种理论化，不稳定的主体及其社会文化，政治和经济环境被认为是共同构成的。基于第一阶段的研究，我们确定了理论问题，现在将在案例研究和理论中解决。关于在子项目中进行的研究，我们将进一步发展南希的激进的本体论概念的“社区”在社会政治，技术生态和经济话语的“共同体”。在这样做时，我们将加强实践方面，特别是程序宪法方面。此外，我们将讨论当前关于资本主义经济与生态之间相互联系的话语，这种话语在关于社区和集体的讨论中变得越来越重要。在第一阶段的背景下，我们具体说明了参与过程的三种模式的媒体理论：互连（TP，1，2，3），时间化（TP 3，4）和批评（TP 1，5）。这些模式可以被理解为对指导第一阶段的模式（共存-“Mitsprechen”，承诺-“Versprechen”和异议-“Widersprechen”）的系统扩展。基于这些中央模态，我们将扩大我们的视野，包括非语言操作，如感觉情感的相互联系。此外，我们将不会把承诺的形式作为一种乌托邦式的愿景来处理，而是分析参与过程的即时时间化。异议的形式将被概念化，作为分析参与性批评的具体形式的一种手段，同时考虑到在这种过程中形成的权力关系的关系性。子项目中不同媒体组合的描述和分析将为社会技术相互联系和产生新形式的参与性批评的特定时间性提供基本见解，因此可以作为媒体参与理论的基础。所有子项目的研究都建立在过程中介性的概念和方法论的基础上，将话语史和话语分析与行为学方法相结合。这些子项目将使用文本，图片，访谈和数据作为扩展话语分析（TP 1，2，5）以及数字过程可视化实践研究（TP 3，4）的对象。

Our theory of‘media participation is based on a processual mediality, which en- or disables the relational assemblages and heterogeneous configurations of participation. Participation can thus be described through processes of mediatisation and their co-constitutive relations. In the proceeding phase we will accentuate the historical and political dimensions in the context of negotiating possible alternatives within modernity. This not only allows for a critical observation of ‚relationality‘ in the field of relational anthropology, but also for a specific kind of theorisation, by which precarious subjects and their sociocultural, political and economic enivronmentalities are thought as co-constitutive. Based on the research of the first phase we identified theoretical problems that will now be addressed both in case studies and in theory. With regard to the research conducted in the sub-projects, we will further develop Nancy’s radical ontological concept of ‘community’ in socio-political, techno-ecological and economic discourses of ‘the common’. In doing so, we will strengthen the aspect of practices and especially that of processual constitution. Also, we will address current discourses on the interconnection between capitalist economy and ecology that has become more and more significant in discussions about communities and collectives. Against the background of the first phase, we specify a media theroy of processes of participation following three modalities: interconnecting (TP, 1, 2, 3), temporalising (TP 3,4) and criticising (TP 1,5). These modalities can be understood as systematic extensions to the modalities that guided the first phase (co-existence – ‘Mitsprechen’, promises – ‘Versprechen’ and dissent – ‘Widersprechen’). Based on these central modalities, we will broaden our perspective to include non-verbal operations, such as sensory-affective interconnections. Furthermore, we will not address the modality of promise as a utopian vision, but instead analyse the immanent temporalisation of participation processes. The modality of dissent will be conceptualized as a means of analysing specific forms of a participatory criticism taking into account the relationality of power relations that come into being in the course of such processes. The description and analysis of different media assemblages in the sub-projects will provide fundamental insights into the socio-technical interconnections and the specific temporalities that generate new forms of participatory criticism and can therefore serve as the basis for a theory of media participation. All sub-projects’ research is founded in the concept of processual mediality and a methodological approach combining both discourse history and discourse analysis with praxeological methods. The sub-projects will use texts, pictures, interviews and data as objects to their extended discourse analysis (TP 1, 2, 5) as well as studies of practices visualised by digital processes (TP 3, 4).