Language-based appresentations of material time-experiences. The relationship of object-aesthetic and social meaning in metaphors of time.

德国的停车场里有这样一句格言：“拔草不会长得更快”。它唤起了两种不同的体验：以一种直接的、几乎发自内心的方式，撕裂草叶的准物质的美学体验是存在的，尽管它不包含在句子的命题结构中。与此同时，人们从社会语境的意义上把这句话理解为一种隐喻性的批评：谁赶东西，谁就毁了它。社会学和语言学的跨学科合作项目通过四个相互关联的关键问题来考察这两个时间性层面之间的关系：1）时间隐喻的使用如何实现语用意义上的对象-审美的经验方式，特别是对象-审美&gt;< / >固有时间&lt;，并赋予它们社会意义？2)这种时间隐喻是如何融入当代社会的文化和制度实践的？3)自世纪以来，哪些过程影响了语言和实践的隐喻结构？4)由于时间隐喻具有双重编码（客体-审美和社会意义）的特点，从时间隐喻的质和量中，我们可以获得什么样的启示，以揭示现代社会后期物质、时间和社会关系的变化？为了记录这两种文化的影响和文化独立的&gt;适当的时代< / >Eigenzeiten&lt;的这种关系，相应的动态将分析在比较的角度包括欧洲和印度。

The adage >Grass does not grow more quickly if you pull on it< adorns a German parking garage. It evokes two distinct experiences: In an immediate and almost visceral way, the quasi-material, aesthetic experience of tearing grass leaves is present, although not contained in the propositional structure of the sentence. At the same time, one understands the sentence in its social-contextual sense as a metaphorical criticism: Whoever rushes things will destroy them. The interdisciplinary project of cooperation between sociology and linguistics examines the relationship between these two planes of temporality by means of four interconnected key questions: 1) How does the use of temporal metaphors realize object-aesthetic manners of experience, especially object-aesthetic >Eigenzeiten< / >proper times<, in terms of pragmatics, imbuing them with social meaning? 2) How are temporal metaphors of this kind integrated into the cultural and institutional practices of contemporary societies? 3) Which processes have influenced the metaphorical structure of language and practices since the 18th century? 4) What insights into the change of material, temporal and social relations to the world / Weltbeziehungen in late modern society can be gleaned from quality and quantity of temporal metaphors on account of their characteristic >double-coding< (object-aesthetic and social sense)? In order to register both cultural influences and cultur-independent >proper times< / >Eigenzeiten< of such relationships, the corresponding dynamics will be analysed in a comparative perspective encompassing Europe and India.