权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Autonomy of Action in late Modernity - subjective Claims, institutional Basis and structural Dynamics of a normative guiding Principle

现代性晚期的行动自主性——规范指导原则的主观主张、制度基础和结构动力

基本信息

批准号：
229270944
负责人：
Professor Dr. Hartmut Rosa
金额：
--
依托单位：
Max-Weber-Kolleg für Kultur- und sozialwissenschaftliche Studien
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2012
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2011-12-31 至 2016-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/229270944?language=en
关键词：
Autonomy Action late Modernity subjective

项目摘要

The idea that subjects seek to autonomously live their lives and shall do so, has not only been a social promise but also a manifest imposition since the 18th century. Central institutions, in the course of their modernization, were redesigned in a way so that they are functional only if and when complemented by actors capable of autonomous agency. Contemporary social diagnoses currently converge in the observation that change in the claims of autonomy and in their chances of realization is taking place, but there is divergence on the question whether the scope for autonomy widens or narrows. This question is to be pursued specifically from the perspective of matching relations between the aspirations of subjects and functional conditions of modern institutions. Therefore it is examined (1) which claims to autonomy subjects raise, (2) which specific potentials for autonomy are functional prerequisites of modern institutions and finally (3) whether and how concretely the feasibility of autonomy is currently changing by social dynamics and what consequences for the institutional order follow from that. The processes of change will be reconstructed from the perspective of social relations of time, because temporality structures are inherent conditions of any form of autonomous practice. The aim is to explore synergies between autonomy claims and institutionalization processes as well as tensions and strains between them in a detailed way and to examine whether acceleratory dynamics as well as the flexibility constraints, which come along with them, pose problems of fit between these dimensions..

自 18 世纪以来，主体寻求并应当自主地生活的理念不仅是一种社会承诺，而且也是一种明显的强加。中央机构在现代化过程中进行了重新设计，只有在有能够自主代理的行为体补充时，它们才能发挥作用。目前，当代社会诊断的共识是，自治的主张及其实现的机会正在发生变化，但在自治的范围是扩大还是缩小的问题上存在分歧。这个问题具体要从主体愿望与现代制度功能条件的匹配关系的角度来探讨。因此，我们要考察（1）自治主体提出了哪些要求，（2）自治的哪些具体潜力是现代制度的功能先决条件，最后（3）自治的可行性目前是否以及如何具体地受到社会动态的影响，以及由此产生的制度秩序的后果。变化的过程将从时间社会关系的角度进行重构，因为时间性结构是任何形式的自主实践的内在条件。目的是详细探讨自治主张和制度化进程之间的协同作用以及它们之间的紧张关系，并研究加速动力以及随之而来的灵活性约束是否会造成这些维度之间的契合问题。