Schadensersatz wegen der Verletzung einer internationalen Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung?

国际商事合同的当事人经常就某一国家法院的专属管辖权达成协议。但是，这种国际选择法院协议并不总是得到当事方的尊重，在某些司法管辖区也不具有约束力。补救措施，如反诉讼禁令，并不总是保护依赖协议的一方免受在减损的法院被起诉的后果。本文考察了违反国际法院选择协议是否有可能要求损害赔偿。本文还分析了相关的外国判例法，并从德国法院的角度讨论了该主题的教条和政治方面。然后，本工作继续探讨《海牙选择法院协议公约》和经修订的《布鲁塞尔第一规则》的适用所产生的差异。

Parties to international commercial contracts often agree on the exclusive jurisdiction of a certain state's courts. However, such international choice of court agreements are not always respected by the parties and neither are they binding in some jurisdictions. Remedies, such as anti-suit injunctions, do not always protect the party relying on the agreement from the consequences of being sued in a derogated forum. The dissertation examines if it would be possible to claim damages for the breach of an international choice of court agreement. lt also analyses relevant foreign case law, and discusses the topic's dogmatic and political aspects from the German courts' perspective. The work then goes on to explore the differences arising from the application of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and the revised Brussels I Regulation.