Pastoral care in the shadows of the High-Court. Edition and analysis of the handwritten records from a Lutheran diacon around 1600.

在赖希帝国早期的忏悔辩论中，关怀被判死刑者的灵魂是最突出的辩论领域之一。它的批判性评价，特别是评价的态度，神职人员的所有供词对他们的牧灵工作，还没有在历史研究的中心，迄今为止，除了少数个案研究。在档案馆的日耳曼国家博物馆在纽伦堡谎言的手写记录约翰内斯Hisperorn，从1605年到1620年负责对那些被判死刑的人进行牧师般的照顾的路德教会执事。因此，毫不奇怪，在过去的几十年里，有相当多的尝试编辑《霍伦》的文本。该项目的目标是实现该版本，并使更广泛的科学受众能够访问Johannes Hobeorn的记录。此外，该项目将从比较的角度来看待《鹰》的文本。为此目的，耶稣会牧师关怀的最重要文件之一，佩德罗德莱昂的记录，他是一位耶稣会牧师，在1578年至1616年期间在锡维拉照顾了300名被判处死刑的人，将与霍洛恩的记录一起分析。尽管佩德罗·德·莱昂的日记早在1981年就已被编辑，但迄今为止，它一直被刑法史领域的研究者所忽视。这两种传统在许多方面是相似的，但同时也表明，在对当局的看法和解释以及被判刑的人和提交人自己作为牧师和看护人的角色方面存在明显的教派差异。《赫氏》杂志与前现代历史的许多研究领域高度相关。该项目将侧重于在犯罪历史和刑法的背景下对文本进行评价和分析。他的著作证明了新教教会无条件批准死刑，以及他们只关心那些受到酷刑威胁的人。作为一个牧师，他比任何人都更接近被蔑视的人。除了有关刑罚制度的细节外，《赫索尔斯》的文本还提供了对教育水平、监狱条件、精神状态以及囚犯行为和精神需求的深入了解。他描述了牧师在刑罚系统中的角色，这种角色往往超越了他们的实际职责。 此外，他还对他本人以及司法人员和囚犯亲属参与的酷刑审讯期间的交流过程提出了见解。通过这种方式，约翰内斯·霍伦的日记使我们比当时的任何其他文件都更接近死刑犯的折磨和痛苦。

Caring for the souls of those sentenced to death was one of the most prominent fields of contestation in the early confessional debates in the Reich. Its critical evaluation, especially the evaluation of the attitude of the clergy of all confessions towards their pastoral work, has not been at the centre of historical research so far, apart from a few case studies.In the archives of the Germanic National museum in Nuremberg lie the handwritten records of Johannes Hagendorn, a Lutheran deacon who was responsible for the pastoral care of those sentenced to death from 1605-1620. Therefore, it is not surprising that there were quite a few attempts at editing the text of Hagendorn over the last decades. It is the aim of the envisioned project to realize the edition and make the records of Johannes Hagendorn accessible to a broader scientific audience. Furthermore, the project will look at Hagendorns text in a comparative perspective. For this purpose, one of the most important documents of the Jesuit pastoral care, the records of Pedro de Leon, who was a Jesuit pastor cared for 300 men sentenced to death in Sivilla between 1578 and 1616, will be analysed alongside the records of Hagendorn. Although Pedro de Leons diary has already been edited in 1981, it has so far been ignored by researchers working in the field of the history of criminal law. Both traditions are similar in multiple ways, but at the same time point to evidently confessional differences in the perception and interpretation of the authority as well as the sentenced men and the authors own role as pastors and caretakers. Hagendorns journal is highly relevant for numerous research areas in premodern history. The project will focus on the evaluation and analysis of the text in the context of the history of criminality [delinquency] and criminal law. His writings prove the unconditional approval of the death penalty by the protestant church as well as the fact that they only cared for those threatened with torturesome punishment. As a pastor, he was closer to the contemned than anybody else. Alongside details about the penal system, Hagendorns text offers insight into the level of education, the prison conditions, the mental state as well as the behavior and the spiritual needs of the prisoners. He describes the role of the pastor within the penal system that often surmounted their actual duties. Furthermore, he offers insight into the communicative processes during torturesome interrogations, in which he himself, as a well as the judicial persons and relatives of the prisoners took part. In this way, the journal of Johannes Hagendorn brings us close to the torture and pain of the condemned men than any other document of the time.