Coordination Funds

自2020年3月以来，跨学科研究小组2733一直致力于圣地改造的课题。这种转变是在社会、宗教和教会内部的全面结构变化的背景下进行的，这被证明是相互依存的，这就是为什么对神圣空间转变的研究能够深入了解这些基本的变化过程。该研究小组旨在以两个比较空间(‘亚琛’和‘莱比锡’)为基础，以跨学科的方式分析和思考神圣空间的转变，以便准确地描述与建筑物、社会空间和相关行为者有关的过程，了解身份的谈判和重建，并确定成功的神圣空间转变进程的后果。在最初的应用中，研究小组在该项目72个月中工作的主要目标是发展21世纪与实践相关的神圣空间理论，以及根据亚琛和莱比锡研究地区的物体分析提供控制神圣空间转变过程的标准的坐标，并巩固跨学科的研究结果。在前人研究和共同讨论的基础上，对这一目标进行了修改和调整，以适应项目中的认知过程。不应把重点放在理论的形成上，而应考虑或出于启发式的原因将神圣的实践或空间实践结合在一起。由于语言创造了现实(例如，通过命名)，而不仅仅是描述现实，因此必须在进一步的研究中批判性地发展“神圣”和“空间”的概念。要做到这一点，有必要将对象研究的认知与理论话语联系起来，并对它们进行反思，以期看到谈判过程中的权力关系。“混合神圣性”的概念将成为这部反思性作品的指导原则，而不是由于前人的发现而使用的“世俗神圣性”概念。此外，该研究小组旨在为关于21世纪神圣空间的理论讨论做出贡献，并为参与神圣空间改造的行为者提供支持。与最初应用中引入的成功改造神圣空间的“标准”概念不同，谈到“艺术规则”(采用施莱尔马赫的经典术语)的发展是有意义的，在中等具体化的情况下，它可以为现场的具体过程提供行动指南。

Since March 2020, the interdisciplinary research group 2733 has been working on the topic of the transformation of sacred spaces. The transformation is in the context of a comprehensive structural change within society, religion and church, which proves to be interdependent, which is why the study of sacred space transformations enables insights into these fundamental processes of change. The research group aims to analyse and reflect on sacred space transformations in an interdisciplinary way on the basis of two comparative spaces ('Aachen' and 'Leipzig') in order to precisely describe the processes with regard to buildings, social spaces and the actors involved, to understand the negotiation and reconstruction of identities, and to identify consequences for successful processes of sacred space transformation. In the initial application, the leading goal of the research group's work in the 72 months of the project was stated as the development of a practice-relevant theory of sacred space in the 21st century, as well as the provision of coordinates of a criteriology for the control of sacred space transformation processes on the basis of the object analyses in the study areas of Aachen and Leipzig and the consolidation of the interdisciplinary findings. Based on previous research and joint discussions, this objective was modified and adapted to the cognitive process in the project. Instead of focusing on theory formation, practices of the sacred or practices of space are to be considered or brought together for heuristic reasons. Since language creates reality (e.g. through designations) and does not merely depict it, the concepts of the "sacred" and "space" must be critically developed in further research. To do this, it is necessary to connect the perceptions from the object studies with the theoretical discourse and to reflect on them with a view to the power relations in the negotiation processes. The concept of "hybrid sacrality", which is used instead of the concept of "secular sacrality" due to the previous findings, is to be the guiding principle in this reflective work. In addition, the research group aims to contribute to the theoretical discussion on sacred spaces in the 21st century and to provide support for actors involved in the transformation of sacred spaces. In contrast to the concept of "criteriology" for successful sacred space transformations introduced in the initial application, it makes sense to speak of the development of "rules of art" (taking up Schleiermacher's classical terminology), which in medium concretion can be action-guiding for concrete processes on site.