Model of Global Japan And Globalization

让我在这里概述一下我对全球化建模的设想。五、全球化的一般或普遍理论（如果有的话）四、每个全球化单位的具体全球化理论或模式（例如，三、按类别划分的全球模式（例如：日本流行文化的全球传播）II.特定于日本的全球模式（例如，口袋妖怪的全球传播模型）I.关于全球化单元的全球化的人种学数据（例如，口袋妖怪在印度尼西亚，美国等）我的批评是，大多数全球化理论的构建者都认为他们正在构建一个普遍的或普遍的理论（V），而实际上他们是在（IV）层面上推测西方的全球化。也就是说，他们认为自己提出的是一个普遍的理论，但是仔细观察，你会发现他们的理论充满了西方文化固有的假设，比如平等、人本、进步等等，正如我在波恩的一次关于原教旨主义的会议上提交的一篇论文中所论证的那样（Befu，1998）。西方的全球化是否等同于普遍的全球化？西方在做其他国家随后必然会效仿的事情吗？这听起来不太像19^世纪<th>的文化进化理论吗？我们在世纪前因为种族中心主义而抛弃了它

Let me outline how I am envisioning globalization modelling here. I see it in several tiers.V.General or universal theory of globalization (if there is such)IV.Specific theory or model of globalization of each globalizing unit(e.g., Model of Japan's globalization)III.Category-specific global model(e.g., global spread of Japan's popular culture)II.Feature-specific global model(e.g., Model of global spread of Pokemon)I.Ethnographic data on globalization of a globalizing unit(e.g. Pokemon in Indonesia, US, etc.)My criticism has been that most builders of globalization theory assume that they are engaged in building a general or universal theory (V), when they are actually speculating on Western globalization at level (IV). That is, they think they are proposing a general theory, but in close inspection, you find that their theory is full of assumptions inherent in Western culture, such as equality, humanism, progress, etc., as I argued in a paper I presented at a conference in Bonn on fundamentalism (Befu 1998). Is the West's globalization equivalent to universal globalization? Is the West doing what others will then inevitably follow doing? Doesn't this sound so much like the 19^<th> century theory of cultural evolution, a la Morgan, Tylor et al., that we abandoned for its ethnocentrism a century ago?