History of theology as history of theology as science

启蒙运动以来新教系统神学的历史可以通过构建问题、立场、流派和话语来讲述，并将它们与现代系统神学如何发展成为一门科学的问题联系起来，并意识到自己的科学特征。这是通过两个基本步骤完成的。首先，在转向宗教，这是植根于人的意识，康德的批判形而上学唤起。这样，神学就脱离了其系统化的、护教性的、教育性的、以信仰及其内容为基础的基本形式，而以一种充实和建构的方式将自己置于内容与人类的虔诚之间。然后，通过在世纪初远离宗教哲学。在这里，神学试图自己建立一个信仰的基础，因此没有建立在哲学，心理学，社会学或文化历史知识之上。这样，系统神学就成为了一门独立的科学。这样制定的基本论文的发展系统神学在现代只能证明工作的历史帐户的材料。反之亦然：对启蒙运动以来系统神学发展的叙述只有在它知道并解释为什么和为了什么目的被讲述时才有意义。

The history of protestant systematic theology since the enlightenment can be told by structuring is issues, positions, schools and discourses and relating them to the question of how systematic theology in modern times evolves into a science in its own right and becomes aware of its own scientific character. This is done in two basic steps. First, in the turn to religion, which is rooted in human consciousness, as evoked by Kant's critique of metaphysics. In this way, theology breaks away from its systematizing, apologetic and pedagogical basic form that rests on faith and its contents and places itself between the contents and human piety in a substantiating and constructing way. Then, by turning away from the philosophy of religion at the beginning of the 20th century. Here theology tries to formulate a foundation of faith on its own, thus without building on philosophical, psychological, sociological or cultural-historical knowledge. By this turn, systematic theology becomes an independent science referring to itself. The so formulated basic thesis on the development of systematic theology in the modern age can only be proven by working on a historical account of the material. And vice versa: a narrative of the development of systematic theology since the enlightenment is only meaningful if it knows and explains why and for what purpose it is told.