Research on the criative process of Buchner's works

在我题为“乔治·布希纳在他的第一部戏剧《丹东之死》中的意识形态立场”的论文中，我试图正确地确定这位德国革命剧作家在19世纪欧洲意识形态流动中的地位。到目前为止，双向选择在Buchner的研究中占主导地位：许多研究人员将他定义为唯物主义者和无神论者，因为他对法国百科全书的信念，而其他研究人员则认为他是自卢梭以来理想主义传统的晚生雅各宾。通过对布希纳戏剧与卢梭、费希特以及霍尔巴赫、狄德罗、艾尔维提乌斯等人的各种哲学作品的比较研究，我得出结论，这两种对立的思想路线在他的第一部戏剧中是相互斗争的，但从未取得胜利。本文通过了德国乔治·布赫纳研究所的评审，并将发表在该研究所的下一期《乔治·布赫纳年鉴》上。关于布赫纳唯一的散文作品《伦茨》的文本研究在德国进行了全面的研究，其成果最近出现在马尔堡乔治·布赫纳研究所出版的布赫纳全集第五卷中。但在本卷的文本研究中存在着许多问题。不仅部分文本被随意解读，而且法国精神病学对Buchner的影响也被高估了，以至于这部小说被歪曲为对当代德国精神病学的批判性研究。我的论文《看穿实证主义的布什——如何解读马尔堡机构出版的《伦茨》》发表在日本乔治·布赫纳学会年刊《子午线》的最新一期上，批评了乔治·布赫纳机构的方法和意图。这篇论文现在通过一位意大利Buchner研究员的斡旋开始，由欧洲同事阅读。虽然关于我的专题“布赫纳作品创作过程研究”的资料很少，但参加2004年在美国举行的国际布赫纳研讨会对我很有帮助。我在这次研讨会上读到的关于“日本文学和德国文字学中的布赫纳接受”的论文将出现在范德比尔特大学和布赫纳研究所出版的《2004年纳什维尔的布赫纳国际研讨会》一书中。少

In my paper entitled "Georg Buchner's ideological standpoint in his first drama Danton's Death" I tried to determine properly the position of this german revolutionary dramatist in ideological flows of 19th century Europe. So far two-way choice is dominant in Buchner research : Many researchers define him as materialist and atheist oweing his conviction to french encyclopedists, while other reseachers consider him a late-born jacobin of the idealistic tradition since Rousseau. Through comparative research between Buchner's dramas and various phiolosohic works by Rousseau and Fichte on the one hand and of Holbach, Diderot and Elvetius on the other, I came to the conclusion in this paper that these two opposing lines of thought were struggling with each other especially in his first drama, yet without ever experiencing triumph. This paper passed the review of the Georg Buchner Institution in Germany and will appear in the next number of its annual, "Georg Buchner Jahrbuch".The text resea … More rch on "Lenz", Buchners only prose piece, has been investigated full-dress in Germany and the accomplishments have lately appeared in the fifth volume of the complete works of Buchner published by the Georg Buchner Institution in Marburg. But there are lots of problems in the text research of this volume. Not only are some parts of the text arbitrarily read, but the influences of the french psychiatry on Buchner are also overestimated so that this novel is distorted as ciritical study on the contemporary german psychiatry. My paper titled "Seeing through the positivistic bush - how to read the "Lenz" published by the institution in Marburg" which came out in the latest issue of the "Meridian", the annuals of the Georg Buchner Society of Japan, criticized the method and intention of the Georg Buchner Institution. This paper beginning now through the good offices of an italian Buchner researcher, to be read by European colleagues.Though there is little reference to my proper subject "research on the creative process of Buchner's works", it was very useful for me to have participated in the International Buchner Symposium 2004 in the USA. The paper I have read on this symposium about "the Buchner reception in the literature and German philology in Japan" is to appear in the book "Georg Buchner International Symposium 2004 in Nashiville" published by Vanderbilt University and the Georg Buchner Institution. Less