The Basic Study on the History of the Foundation of the Mongolian Empire

对蒙古帝国建国史的分析和研究，有必要对基础史料进行研究。从这个角度出发，我对《Jami al-tawarikh》等史料进行了深入的研究。同时，通过对相关资料的比较，笔者在此基础上对成吉思汗与《可兰经》的关系进行了研究，认为分析和研究《可兰经》的主持者——天真汗与《可兰经》的关系具有重要意义。特别是我认为，对Ong Khan说他是Temijin的父亲和Temijin说他是Ong Khan的儿子这一关系的研究和分析是很重要的。但是因为这个问题比较复杂，涉及的领域比较多，所以这次我只把研究的重点放在了早期的父子关系上。结论如下：(1)可能是在1180年初，天真嫁给了博特，向他致敬，向他赠送了一件由博特的母亲送给他的貂皮大衣，并说他是博特的父亲。我认为他们的父子关系不是在这个时候正式开始的。我也不认为Temjin像一些学者所说的那样成为了Ong khan的仆人。为了证明(2)，我分析了《蒙古秘史》第94段和第104段的文章，在这两段中，铁木真说王可汗是他的父亲，并进一步分析了他们之间的关系，从1180年初到1190年中期左右，铁木真再次声称王可汗是他的父亲。结果证明，在上述时期，它们之间几乎没有关系；那是一个编造的故事，说被人鱼用武力抓走的波特在战争中被抓了回来；在那个年代，天真象与昂可汗的关系似乎并没有那么密切，人们认为，在那之后，天真象通知了昂可汗他所谓的第一次登基，这并不是天真象要求昂可汗批准他的登基，而只是向他报告。因此，我指出，在这一时期，与翁可汗的关系对Temjin来说并不一定重要。从这个时候开始，我想研究在1190年代中期之后，王可汗和天真王的父子关系，了解天真王和喀列王朝的关系，并试图接近蒙古帝国建立历史上最重要的一部分。少

It is necessary to study basic historical materials for the analysis and study of the history of the foundation of the Mongolian Empire. From this point of view, I made a thorough study on the historical materials such as "Jami al-tawarikh". At the same time, comparing the relevant materials closely, I made a research on the relation between Temjin = Chingis khan and the Kereid on the basis of the said study, I think that the analysis and study of the relation between Temjin and Ong Khan, - the director of the Kereid --, is important. Especially I think that the study and analysis of the r elation in which Ong Khan says that he was Temjin's father and Temijin says that he is Ong khan's son is important. However, because this matter is complicated and covers many fields, this time I focused my study only on the early father and son relation. The conclusion is as follows : (1) It is probably at the beginning of 1180's that Temjin married Borte, greeted Ong Khan by Presenting him with a o … More vercoat made of sable which had been given to Temjin by Borte's mother and said that he was Temjin's father. (2) I don't think that their father and son relation formally started at this time. I don't think also that Temjin became a retainer of Ong khan as some scholors have referred to. In order to prove (2) I analyzed the article on the passages 94 and 104 in "The Secret History of Mongolia" in which Temjin says that Ong khan is his father, and further I analized the relations between them from the beginning of 1180's to around the middle of 1190's which appears in the historical material in which Temjin again claims that Ong khan is his father. As a result I proved that there was little relation between them during the above period ; that it was a make-up story that Borte who had been taken by force by the Merkid was taken back in the war ; that Temjin seemed not so closely related with Ong Khan in those days and that it is considered that after that Temjin informed Ong khan of his so-called first enthronement, which was not Temjin's requirement for Ong khan's approval of his enthronment, but only a report to him. Consequently I stated that the relation to Ong khan was not necessarily important to Temjin in this period. From this time on I would like to study the father and son relation between Ong Khan and Temjin after the middle of 1190's, understand the relation between Temjin and the Kereid and try to approach the most important part of the history of the foundation of the Mongolian Empire. Less