A Fundamental and Empirical Study of the Influence of East Asian Cultures on the Grammaticalization Patterns of East Asian Languages

从社会语言学、语用学、礼貌理论和语言人类学的视角出发，首席研究员（Sachiko Ide）一方面探索了东亚社区特有的语言意识形态与这些社区特有的语法现象(如对人称代词使用的社会语言学限制、语法化的敬语、句末助词和会话话语中常见的反向通道行为)。Ide组织了三次国际研讨会，调查文化价值观之间的关系。“和谐”)和语言使用（如句末助词，反向通道），并在各种国际会议和研讨会（如国际语用学协会）上作为主题演讲或特邀演讲。此外，作为语文使用规划委员会的主任，Ide主要参与提出了一项题为“新时代的语言礼貌”的提案。研究者堀江馨（Kaoru Horie）从语言类型学和认知功能语言学的角度分析了东亚语言的语法化模式。具体来说，堀江发现日语倾向于在形式（结构）和意义之间表现出一对多或多对一的对应关系，而韩语倾向于表现出更严格的一对一形式-意义映射。堀江贵文认为，这种差异与两个语言社区的不同文化交际实践有关。堀江文在国际认知语言学协会、国际韩国语学界等国际会议上发表了研究成果。概念结构、语言与语篇研讨会，日、韩语言学研讨会。

From the perspective incorporating the insights of sociolinguistcs, pragmatics, politeness theory, and linguistic anthropology, Principal Investigator (Sachiko Ide) has explored an intricate interrelationship between linguistic ideologies unique to East Asian communities, on the one hand, and grammatical phenomena characteristically observed in these communities (e.g. sociolinguistic constraints on the use of personal pronouns, grammaticalized honorifics, sentence-final particles and back-channle behavior frequent in conversational discourse). Ide organized three international workshops investigating the relationship between cultural values (e.g. "harmony") and language use (e.g. sentence-final particles, backchannels) at Japan Woman's University and lectured on her theoretical findings at various international conferences and symposiums (e.g. International Pragmatics Association) as a keynote or invited speaker. Furthermore, as the director of the language planning commission on the use of language, Ide was principally involved in submitting a proposal entitled "Linguistic Politeness for the New Age".From the perspective of linguistic typology and cognitive-functional linguistics, Investigator (Kaoru Horie) analyzed the grammaticalization patterns in East Asian languages. Specifically, Horie found that Japanese tends to show one-to-many or many-to-one correspondence between form (structure) and meaning, whereas Korean tends to exhibit one-to-one form-meaning mapping more rigidly. Horie argued that this contrast is correlated with the differential cultural-communicative practices in two linguistic communities. Horie presented the research findings at various international conferences (e.g. International Cognitive Linguistic Association, International Circle of Korean Linguistics. Conference on Conceptual Structure, Language, and Discourse, Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conferene).