Reconsideration on the Cold War history : from European perspective

本研究项目有以下结果。就高桥而言，第一个是岩上1999年出版的《作为历史的德国统一》一书。第二篇是《日本的全球意义》这篇文章，现在正在印刷中，将在2000年的劳特利奇杂志上发表。Nakayama有以下三个成果：(1)《欧盟国家》一书中的“法国：从20世纪的角度看”；(2)《欧洲政治史手册》中的“法国：政治研究指南”；(3) Serge Bernstein和Antoine Prost等人的《La nacissance de La Toisieme Force and La lutte contre La hausse de prix》。Eds。，《抵抗与共和》，索邦大学出版社，2000年。另一个结论是，冷战史研究在美国和欧洲都有很强的研究传统。很粗略地说，美国的研究倾向于将这一主题作为冷战史，而欧洲的研究倾向于将其作为战后历史，这种差异的发现是这个项目的副产品。

This research project has the following outcomes. As Takahashi concerned, the first one is the book, "German Unification as History" published by Iwanami 1999. The second one is the article "Global Meaning of Japan, " which now in printing, will appear in Routledge 2000. Nakayama has the following three outcomes : (1)"France : from the perspective 20^<th> century, " in the book, EU countries : (2)"France : the research guide of politics, " in Handbook of European Political Historyi ; (3) La naissance de la Toisieme Force et la lutte contre la hausse de prix, "in Serge Bernstein and Antoine Prost et al. Eds., La Parti socialiste entre Resistance et Republique, Publications de la Sorbonne, 2000.Another outcome is the conclusion that the study on the Cold War History has each strong research traditions in US and Europe. Very roughly said, while the research in the USA has the tendency to treat this topic as the Cold War history, the European one inclines to treat it as the Post-War history The finding of this difference is the by-product of this project.