The multi-layered diversification of public spheres and the reconstruction of legal system

我们的研究旨在完成以下三个任务：（1）识别当代世界公共领域的多层次多样化对社会秩序形成的新挑战;（2）构建一个更高层次的原则，尊重每个不同公共领域的自主性，并在功能互补的基础上促进它们的合作;（3）以这种更高层次的公共性原则为基础，重构能够塑造法律的体系基本结构的法律的哲学基本范畴。研究结果表明：（1）基于传统公私二分法的政府控制在一系列新的社会现象中失去了有效性：性别歧视和家庭暴力，利用市场提供适合普通人生活需要的“公共物品”，公私在医疗保险中的分工，多元文化，社会主义市场经济 ...更多信息 公共与私人界限的冲突以及数字赋权与个人自由和隐私之间的矛盾关系。(2)我们已经表明，传统的公共模型（球形模型，代理中心模型和程序模型）是不足以满足公共领域的多层次多样化的挑战。作为一个更有前途的替代方案，我们提出了一个理性导向的公共模型，要求我们给予公共理由开放的异质性的角度来看，其他人的基础上的普遍正义的概念相结合的可逆性测试。(3)我们已经表明，法律的哲学的主流学派，如自由主义、社群主义、共和主义和法经济学，都面临着重塑其基本概念和原则的压力，基于正义的公共理性模式使我们能够克服私人领域的歧视和压制。“我们还指出，关注他人和以正义为基础的公共模式有助于我们振兴公共产品的市场供应，并在自由权利和宪政民主原则的框架内重新统一公民美德和对文化多样性的开放态度。少

Our research aimed to carry out the following three tasks : (1) to identify new challenges to sodal order-formation presented by the multi-layered diversification of public spheres in the contemporary world ; (2) to construct a higher-order principle that can respect the autonomy of each of the diverse public spheres and promote their cooperation based on a functional complementarity ; and (3) to reconstruct the basic categories of legal philosophy that can shape the basic structure of legal system on a basis of such higher-order public principle. Our results are the following :(1) We have shown that the governmental control based on the conventional private/public dichotomy has lost its efficacy m the context of a variety of emerging social phenomena : gender-discrimination and domestic violence, the use of market in supplying the kind of "public goods" that fit the ordinary people's needs of life, the division of labor between the public and private in health insurance, the multicult … More ural conflict about the demarcation of the public and private and the ambivalent relationships between the digital empowerment and individual freedom and privacy.(2) We have shown that the conventional models of the public (the spherical model, the agent-centered model and the procedural model) are inadequate to meet the challenges of multi-layered diversification of public spheres. As a more promising alternative, we presented a reason-oriented model of the public that requires us to give public justification open to the heterogenic perspectives of the others on a basis of the universalistic concept of justice as combined with the test of reversibility.(3) We have shown that the dominant schools of legal philosophy such as liberalism, communitarianism, republicanism and law and economics' are all pressed to reshape their basic concepts and principles and that the justice-based reason model of the public enables us to overcome the discrimination and repression in the 'private spheres." We have also pointed out that the other-regarding and justice-based model of the public help us to revitalize the market supply of the public goods and reunite the civic virtue and openness to cultural diversity within the framework of liberal rights and principles of constitutional democracy. Less