Comparison between A. Baeumler and Thomas Mann related to Fascism

日Mann和A.在此基础上，鲍姆勒等人以神话的文化阐释方式批判了欧洲神话主义。然而，他们留下了两个截然不同的政治观点的轨道：A。鲍姆勒是启蒙运动时期的黑格尔派，后来转变为纳粹党人，而保守的犹太人则是纳粹党人。曼恩走上了民主之路。为什么会发生这样的穿越？通过对A.巴霍芬选集的“介绍”，并在Th。Manns的批评，在A.这是由于他在《导言》中的思想逻辑矛盾造成的。

Th. Mann and A. Baeumler stand on the same basis, where they criticized the European Rationalism by their mythological interpretation of culture. They left nevertheless two contrasted tracks of the political view : A. Baeumler, a Hegelian of the Enlightenment, transformed into a Nazi, while conservative Th. Mann went his way to democracy. Why did such a crossing happen? It was confirmed by the analysis of A. Baeumler's "Introduction" to Bachofen-Anthology and with help of Th. Manns criticism of it, that in case of A. Baeumler, it came from the logical contradiction of his thought in his "Introduction".