The basho theoretical inquiry into the metaphysical problems of mind

为什么作为物质的大脑会产生物质中不存在的精神？精神和物质是如何相互作用的？为什么作为主体性核心的“我”会出现？我们的意志是被决定的还是自由的？这些问题在哲学史上一直被认为是形而上学的问题。这一研究试图回顾从一开始就维持这些对立概念的条件，并试图使这些问题本身无效，而不是找出连接这些概念的概念手段。然后，我们将西田的basho理论应用于将现实视为无限而将概念视为现实的局限性的审判中。通过这种方式，我们探讨了我们的概念装置的有用性和应用的局限性。

Why brain as material produces mind whose quality doesn't exist in material? How can mind and material interact each others? Why "I" as a core of subjectivity have come to existence? Is our will determined or is it free? Such questions have been argued as metaphisical problems in the history of philosophy.This reserach has tried to retrospect to the conditions which have sustained those opposite concepts from the beginning and tried to make those probrems themselves invalid, instead of making out conceptual devicies which bridge those concepts. Then, we have applied Nishida's basho theory to that trial which regards reality as the unlimited and regards concepts as limitations of reality, on the contrary. In this way, we have inquired into the usefulness and the limits of applications of our conceptual devices.