Lex-Atlas: Covid-19: A Comparative Study of National Legal Responses to COVID-19.

原始申请：“该项目的核心成果是一份汇编、一个数据库和一份最终报告，由14位国际知名学者撰写，内容涉及全球各地区80个国家对新冠肺炎的法律的应对措施。该汇编包括80份由当地法律的专家撰写的关于相关国家应对新冠肺炎的国家报告，涵盖：（1）宪法/法律的框架;（2）机构的运作（如立法机构、法院）;（3）所采取的核心公共卫生措施;（4）所采取的社会和经济措施;（5）有关公民自由和弱势群体的主要法律的措施。该数据库整理了有关这些主题的确定和可量化的数据，使用户能够进行全面的跨国比较，并与其他已知的社会经济、政治和卫生数据进行关联。对数据进行分析性概述，确定应对趋势以及与主要社会经济和卫生指标的相关性; 2.对各种专题领域（如隐私、公民自由、移徙）进行深入的批判性分析，提出与不同专题有关的最佳和最差做法以及国家的总体表现。这些交付成果为评估英国对新冠肺炎的应对以及未来的大流行准备提供了关键的比较数据，特别是关于UKRI确定为关键的几个主题和问题：经济，性别和种族不平等;安全和正义;国家恢复和转型;接触者追踪;以及国家安全和外交政策。该项目的传播计划包括一个明确和可行的影响途径，进入英国议会和白厅的决策。“来自www.lexatlas-c19.org网站，更友好的媒体：“Lex-Atlas：Covid-19（LAC 19）项目于2020年秋季启动，将提供对世界各地国家法律的应对Covid-19的学术分析。它将在2021年更新，并将由牛津大学出版社开放获取。该项目是来自世界各地的法律的专家广泛合作的产物，由伦敦大学学院、伦敦国王学院、马克斯·普朗克比较公法研究所牵头，并得到英国艺术与人文研究理事会的慷慨支持。该项目的动机是需要全面概述各国对新冠肺炎的法律的应对。这一流行病有许多方面，各国的应对措施差别很大。除了流行病的表现之外，各国使用紧急权力的方式也不同，体制混乱的类型也不同，公共卫生措施也不同，社会政策的覆盖面和对弱势群体人权需求的反应也不同。对这些法律的应对措施进行学术性的概述，对于评估过去的政治选择和为未来的流行病做准备都是必要的。将它们详细编目也将是对这一大流行病历史的重要贡献。然而，该主题的复杂性和流动性本质上需要一种非传统的学术方法。为了使国际比较具有价值，需要各国著名的法律的专家之间进行高度协调，需要有一个采用一致方法的庞大编辑团队，并需要有能力随着法律和政策随着流行病的演变而改变各国的形象，本项目力求通过法律的学者之间的全球合作来满足这一需要。该项目的核心可交付成果包括一份国家报告简编、一个数据库和一份最后报告，其中包括该项目编辑委员会认为的最佳和最差做法。所有可交付成果都将开放获取，数据将保持开源。项目门户网站和进一步详情可在www.lexatlas-c19.org上查阅。"

Original application: 'The project's core deliverables are a Compendium, a Database and a Final Report by fourteen internationally distinguished scholars on the legal responses to Covid-19 in 80 countries across all regions of the world. The Compendium comprises 80 national reports written by local legal experts on the relevant country's response to Covid-19, covering: (1) the constitutional/legal framework; (2) the functioning of institutions (e.g. legislatures, courts); (3) the core public health measures adopted; (4) the social and economic measures adopted; and (5) key legal measures in respect of civil liberties and vulnerable groups. The Database collates determinate and quantifiable data on these themes, allowing users to conduct comprehensive cross-national comparisons and correlations with other known socio-economic, political and health data.The Final Report will comprise: 1. an analytical overview of the data, identifying response trends and correlations to major socio-economic and health indicators; and 2. an in-depth critical analysis of various thematic areas (e.g. privacy, civil liberties, migration), proposing best and worst practices in relation to different themes as well as overall state performance. The deliverables provide critical comparative data for the assessment of the UK's response to Covid-19 as well as for future pandemic preparedness, in general and with particular reference to several topics and questions identified as critical by UKRI: economic, gender and race inequalities; security and justice; national recovery and transformation; contact tracing; and national security and foreign policy. The project's dissemination plans include a clear and viable impact pathway into decision-making in the UK Parliament as well as in Whitehall.' From the www.lexatlas-c19.org website, more media friendly:"The Lex-Atlas: Covid-19 (LAC19) project was launched in the fall 2020 and will provide a scholarly analysis of national legal responses to Covid-19 around the world. Updated across 2021, it will be published open-access by Oxford University Press. It is the product of a vast collaboration of legal experts from across the world, led by University College London, King's College London, the Max Planck Institute of Comparative Public Law and generously supported by the UK's Arts and Humanities Research Council.The project is motivated by the need for a comprehensive overview of national legal responses to Covid-19. The pandemic has many facets, and national responses have varied considerably. Quite apart from epidemiological performance, countries have employed emergency powers differently, have had different kinds of institutional disruption, diverged in public health measures, and have had variable social policy coverage and responses to the human rights needs of vulnerable groups. A scholarly overview of these legal responses is required both to assess past political choices and to prepare for future pandemics. Cataloguing them in detail will also be an important contribution to the history of the pandemic. However, the complexity and fluid nature of the subject-matter essentially requires an unconventional scholarly approach. To make the international comparisons valuable, it requires a high degree of coordination between distinguished national legal experts, a large editorial team applying a consistent methodology, and the capacity to change national portraits as the law and policy shifts in line with the evolution of the pandemic.The project seeks to meet this need through a world-wide collaboration between legal scholars. The project's core deliverables include a Compendium of Country Reports, a Database, and a Final Report covering best and worst practices in the views of the project's Editorial Committee. All deliverables will be open-access and data will be held open-source. The project portal and further details are available at www.lexatlas-c19.org."