Classifying and Understanding Remedies in Comparative Labour Law

CURE通过以多学科的方式研究当代相关的一个关键但被忽视的问题，即补救措施的概念，为比较劳动法设定了一个新的智力议程和方向。该项目促进了对补救措施的重新思考，超越了将补救措施视为与法律科学主义原则相关的技术实践，而是将其视为一种法律结构机制，位于政治和经济进程之间，在资本主义社会中发挥构成作用。为此，该项目为法律制度主义带来了更深层次的维度，研究了作为法律、政治和经济体系内部和之间批判性参与的实践，争议如何导致对补救措施的新理解，并最终塑造了我们对有效补救劳工侵权和错误行为的社会想象。CURE采用了多维、比较和多方法的研究设计，以产生我们如何分析法律概念的范式转变。它考察了跨一组不同的国家制度（即法国、希腊、波兰、瑞典和英国）的一组象征性的劳工权利，代表了雇佣关系的核心维度（即就业地位、平等、工资、解雇和工业行动）。数据收集和分析包括法律和经验（即弹性、计算和定性）方法，专门用于捕捉和解释内部（即法律）和外部（即政治和经济）在不同距离上对补救框架的监管的观点。CURE最终将提供一个解释性地图，该地图将足够强大，以阐明补救措施在校准劳动法有效性方面的关键作用，并具有足够的确定性，根据现有监管框架的评估和方向提供重要指导，并以这种方式为劳动法纪律和劳工政策制定和实践做出贡献。

CURE sets a new intellectual agenda and direction in comparative labour law by examining in a multi-disciplinary way a crucial but neglected issue of contemporary relevance, that is the concept of remedies. The project promotes a provocative rethinking of remedies by going beyond treating remedies as a technical exercise connected to principles of legal scientism to consider them instead as a legally structured mechanism, located between political and economic processes, that play a constitutive role in capitalist societies. To that end, the project brings a deeper dimension to legal institutionalism by examining how contestation as a practice of critical engagement within and across legal, political and economic systems leads to novel understandings about remedies and ultimately shapes our social imaginaries of effective redress against labour violations and wrongs. CURE adopts a multi-dimensional, comparative and multi-method research design to generate a paradigm shift in how we analyse juridical concepts. It examines diachronically a set of emblematic labour rights representing the core dimensions of the employment relationship (i.e. employment status, equality, wage, dismissal and industrial action) across a set of distinct national systems (i.e. France, Greece, Poland, Sweden and the UK). Data collection and analysis includes legal and empirical (i.e. leximetric, computational and qualitative) methods specifically designed to capture and interpret internal (i.e. legal) and external (i.e. political and economic) perspectives on the regulation of the remedial framework at different distances. CURE will ultimately offer an interpretative map that will be robust enough to illuminate the crucial role of remedies in calibrating the effectiveness of labour law and determinative enough to provide significant guidance as per the evaluation and direction of existing regulatory frameworks and contribute in this way to the labour law discipline and labour policy-making and practice.